2020 election voting analysis

[Monello]

This doesn't prove fraud. It shows the likelihood that irregularities occurred. This paper should be getting more media scrutiny.

Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times reported on a new peer-reviewed paper that analyzes the results of the 2020 election and found Biden received 255,000 excess votes. It has been accepted for publication by the journal Public Choice and was written by Dr. John R. Lott of the Crime Prevention Research Center.

1. Georgia, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin did not match signatures on the outer mail-in envelopes to the official registration records. Some states, like Pennsylvania accepted ballots that were not enclosed in outer envelopes. These acts are in violations of the laws in many states and make it impossible to verify a vote’s legitimacy.
2. Lott compares votes in adjacent voting precincts, where one of the precincts is accused of voter fraud, as with Georgia’s Fulton County, and finds statistically significant evidence of abnormal mail-in and absentee ballot results. In short, Trump’s absentee ballot share in the Fulton County precincts was depressed, compared to adjoining precincts. The largest estimate of depressed Trump votes was more than Biden’s margin in Georgia.
3. In Pennsylvania and other states, numerous voters trying to vote in person were told they had already voted absentee, suggesting that someone else had voted using their name. The differences found to be statistically significant in Georgia were not significant in Pennsylvania, but Pennsylvania was missing some essential data for the study, which was a problem.
4. In Nevada, 42,000 people voted more than once, 1,500 dead people voted, and 19,000 did not have a Nevada residence.
5. In Wisconsin 28,395 people voted without identification.
6. In Georgia, Nevada, and Pennsylvania, the rejection of improper absentee ballots in 2020 were a fraction of those rejected in 2016.

1. Lott concludes that his study underestimates the extent of voter fraud because it assumes that no voter fraud occurred with in-person voting. He also concludes that there were 142,000 to 368,000 total excess Biden votes, enough to swing the election.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/03/30/a-peer-reviewed-statistical-analysis-of-the-2020-election/

 

[Monello]

A link to the entire paper.

Simple tests for the extent of vote fraud with absentee and provisional ballots in the 2020 US presidential election

This study reports three tests measuring vote fraud in the 2020 US presidential election, although they provide inconsistent evidence. To isolate the impact of

papers.ssrn.com

 

[Grumpy]

This doesn't prove fraud. It shows the likelihood that irregularities occurred. This paper should be getting more media scrutiny.

There was fraud, no doubt in my mind. There's been umpteen reasonable studies done that show legitimate concerns but no one with any power is pushing it(both sides of the aisle) because TRUMP. This cabal in the White House is bent on destroying this country...WHY? Are they so compromised that they are merely puppets to some greater power?

 

[Kinnakeet]

There was fraud, no doubt in my mind. There's been umpteen reasonable studies done that show legitimate concerns but no one with any power is pushing it(both sides of the aisle) because TRUMP. This cabal in the White House is bent on destroying this country...WHY? Are they so compromised that they are merely puppets to some greater power?

Puppets to some greater power....Is correct

 

[Hijinx]

Oh! There was fraud all right.
And it wasn't just a few Democrat cheats who decided to do this on their own.

It was a planned operation, well thought out and done in States that had the electoral votes to place this joke we have for President in the White house.
I don't perceive to know where and who planned the coup, but that is exactly what happened and it was accepted by the media and the SCOTUS of this country. It was a large scale operation that involved the political party that won in this criminal manner.

 

[SamSpade]

Some of this is like observations that there isn't bias in the media, because there's no way to prove intent, and because clear verifiable issues of bias are scattered across them all. There's bias everywhere, so - it's nothing to be concerned about.

In Ukraine, those defending Russia would try to justify hitting civilian targets like homes, schools, theaters and hospitals as accidental or collateral. It's just that when you can send a cruise misslle across hundreds of miles and hit a fuel depot between the eyes, it's not an accident or mistaken intel. It's on purpose.

Here's the thing - if cases of voting irregularity by and large ALWAYS favor one party over another, it's not an irregularity - an irregularity would tend to fall on both sides proportionally or at least corrolating to historical data.

What's disturbing to me is that the Dems favor voting conditions which are increasingly less and less secure - and bristle and get enraged when Republcians want them MORE secure, insisting that it disenfranchises people.

A voting system that is not secure DISENFRANCHISES EVERY SINGLE VOTER. When you have things like drop boxes for ballots that can EASILY be stuffed with fraudulent ballots, you allow EVERYONE'S vote to be invalidated.