2024 Election Fallout

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member


1731668715938.png




Massive Shift in Urban Voting Helped Elect Trump


Trump saw gains nearly everywhere, but urban areas stand out because, without massive turnout in the big cities, Democrats can kiss their electoral prospects goodbye.

Big cities are where the elite tend to congregate, and the Democrat coalition has recently been characterized by an odd alliance between wealthy, overeducated and irrationally leftist elites and working-class minorities. Throw in public employee unions and Democrats could count on huge turnout in urban areas.

The turnout, while still large, is not quite so massive anymore as America's cities face a crisis in governance.

Trump most overperformed in large metro counties, according to analyst Jed Kolko. Compared with his run against Joe Biden, Trump ran 9 points closer to Kamala Harris in such areas—a bigger gain than he saw in suburbs, college towns, or military posts.
It wasn’t just a few cities, either. Trump improved on his 2020 performance in cities as diverse as Chicago, Detroit, and Dallas. He won Miami-Dade County outright. He got the closest margin for a Republican in New York City in 30 years. He won a precinct in lower Manhattan; one south Philadelphia neighborhood voted for him by almost three to one.
These swings are partly a byproduct of the surprising diversity of the Trump coalition, which exit polling suggests may have included a fifth of black men and a majority of Latino men. In New York City, Trump ran up votes not just on Staten Island, but in hyper-diverse Queens and South Brooklyn.


 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
The folks over on r/maryland are throwing out all kinds of excuses to show that Trump didn't actually pick up votes in deep blue MD.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Democrats: The Embodiment of 'Stupid Is As Stupid Does'


There was a discernible shift in political discourse in the past decade, and not for the better. There was a time when politicians would focus their attacks on their opponents and only their opponents.

The voters were out of bounds. And rightly so. Any good politician will acknowledge he or she is likely going to need those voters, and their votes, down the road.

I think it's safe to say that rhetoric changed with Barack Obama. The supposed great uniter, Nobel Prize winning figurehead behind Hope and Change.

He was the one who, like all good adherents to Alinsky, 'picked the target, froze it, personalized it, and polarized it.' And that target was half of American voters. We were, as you'll recall, 'bitter clingers' who liked our guns and our Bibles and were just holding America back, gosh darn it.

Ever since Obama made it de rigueur to attack the voters, the gloves were off. Hillary Clinton called us a 'basket of deplorables', Joe Biden called us 'domestic terrorists', and Kamala Harris called us 'Nazis.'

But the Left can only cry wolf so many times before the villagers stop showing up. And last week, the villagers ignored those cries and elected Donald Trump by solid margins in both the Electoral College and the popular vote.

I like to learn from the mistakes I make. I reflect on them, figure out what I did wrong, and strive to not repeat those errors. It helps both professionally and personally and that's where growth happens.

I am also not a Leftist. And if there's one thing I've learned during my time being elbows-deep in politics it's that the Left is incapable of that same introspection, reflection, and growth.

So they keep calling voters stupid, hoping maybe it'll finally browbeat us into compliance:








1731673483990.png
 
Top