3rd SEAL Not Guilty!

twinoaks207

twinoaks207

Having Fun!
Well, halleluyah and praise Jesus! FINALLY! Someone shows some common sense along with a set of balls.


There is still HOPE!

( we haven't changed too much yet!)
 
smdavis65

smdavis65

...
AWESOME! :yahoo:

It sucks that we put our military servicemen through this BS so the terrorists can feel better about themselves. :tantrum

#### you terrorist! :middlefinger:
 
Penn

Penn

Dancing Up A Storm
smdavis65 said:
AWESOME! :yahoo:

It sucks that we put our military servicemen through this BS so the terrorists can feel better about themselves. :tantrum

#### you terrorist! :middlefinger:
Click to expand...

I don't know if this qualifies for "Post Of The Day", but it's gotta be damned close to the top of the list! :patriot:
 
R

royhobie

hobieflyer
Too bad we can't take the idiots to court that started this mess. Charge them with wasting our tax dollars with their far left stupidity.
 
Monello

Monello

Smarter than the average bear
PREMO Member
smdavis65 said:
AWESOME! :yahoo:

It sucks that we put our military servicemen through this BS so the terrorists can feel better about themselves. :tantrum

#### you terrorist! :middlefinger:
Click to expand...
Now to get a pardon for Charles Graner and the rest of the lower ranking enlisted guards that got jail time for the Abu Ghraib prisoner mistreatment.

Anyone who thinks an Army Specialist was running the prison, raise your hand. But he's the highest ranking service member to do jail time, while others like his boss Colonel Steven L. Jordan gets a reprimand. Imagine that.

Steven L. Jordan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The UCMJ is neither Uniform nor Just.
 
Larry Gude

Larry Gude

Strung Out
ImnoMensa said:
Only good news I have heard today.

Thank God somebody in the Navy had some common sense.
Click to expand...

Like who? Like the any number of people along the way who could have put and end to this farce LONG before it ever came to a goddamn trial for punching an unruly POW?

We lost this case the day formal charges were accepted. That we closed the garage door, stuck the pipe in the exhaust, into the car and rolled the windows up tight and started her up, sleeping pills and bottle of whiskey at out side and that some one, finally, came along and opened the door is small solace. We mean to kill ourselves and will just try again.

The only way this is good news is if those who pursued this are thrown out of the NAVY with dishonorable discharge so they can go chase ambulances full time, including the senior people who thought it was a good idea to go through this exercise in insanity. Then, there will be really good news.

We have lost our way and lost out minds.
 
Matthew

Matthew

New Member
As happened in My Lai. The heat of battle is never comparable to classroom theory. How many of us could say we would have acted differently, particularly in a case like this, where it was the word of a proven terrorist [or in the case of the two border agents]a drug dealing illegal thug.
 
ImnoMensa

ImnoMensa

New Member
Dixie said:
On the contrary I think this was one of the Navy's finer hours.

All three Seals were assigned the duty of guarding the prisoner. I have no objections that ONE of them punched him, if in fact that really happened, BUT I doubt seriously if that was a part of their duty that night. The Seal that was charged with assault was charged correctly - it's part of the package when you take the oath - there are certain rules and regulations that we must uphold - that's what helps maintain order and discipline.

The other two were charged with dereliction, impeding an investigation, and false statements. Anyone who's ever served knows you don't lie to a superior officer.

The military gave them an option in accordance with their regs - the Seals said not interested - the military proceeded with what they should have done. The Seals went to trial because they felt they were innocent and the correct verdict (in my opinion) was rendered. Everyone did exactly what they were supposed to do and the outcome was exactly what it should have been. The system worked.
Click to expand...

It was brought up in the trial that these terrorists are taught to bring such charges up when they are arrested. That when they bring up such charges they are treated better ,because no one else wants to be in the situation these three men were.

The military knew that when these charges appeared, they should have ignored those charges. These three men went through a boatload of horse crap because some idiot decide to charge them and put them through it.

The military members of the court used common sense and a knowledge of the terrorists Modus Operandi to come to a sensical judgement of not guilty.
It wasnt the Navy's finest hour , the Navy's finest hour was when these men captured this dipstick, and used great restraint and didnt shoot and kill the socksucker like he deserved.
 
Matthew

Matthew

New Member
ImnoMensa said:
It was brought up in the trial that these terrorists are taught to bring such charges up when they are arrested. That when they bring up such charges they are treated better ,because no one else wants to be in the situation these three men were.

The military knew that when these charges appeared, they should have ignored those charges. These three men went through a boatload of horse crap because some idiot decide to charge them and put them through it.

The military members of the court used common sense and a knowledge of the terrorists Modus Operandi to come to a sensical judgement of not guilty.
It wasnt the Navy's finest hour , the Navy's finest hour was when these men captured this dipstick, and used great restraint and didnt shoot and kill the socksucker like he deserved.
Click to expand...
Affirmative. I personally thought they showed remarkable restraint. I would have had no problem if the little S""t accidently fell from a chopper.
 
Baja28

Baja28

Obama destroyed America
Dixie said:
On the contrary I think this was one of the Navy's finer hours.

All three Seals were assigned the duty of guarding the prisoner. I have no objections that ONE of them punched him, if in fact that really happened, BUT I doubt seriously if that was a part of their duty that night. The Seal that was charged with assault was charged correctly - it's part of the package when you take the oath - there are certain rules and regulations that we must uphold - that's what helps maintain order and discipline.

The other two were charged with dereliction, impeding an investigation, and false statements. Anyone who's ever served knows you don't lie to a superior officer.

The military gave them an option in accordance with their regs - the Seals said not interested - the military proceeded with what they should have done. The Seals went to trial because they felt they were innocent and the correct verdict (in my opinion) was rendered. Everyone did exactly what they were supposed to do and the outcome was exactly what it should have been. The system worked.
Click to expand...
You are really out there. Move to Yemen.
 
TurboK9

TurboK9

New Member
Dixie said:
On the contrary I think this was one of the Navy's finer hours.
Click to expand...

Yeah. Right up there with the sinking of the BB Arizona and the bombing of the USS Cole.

These are soldiers. Have you ever been in combat? Do you know what these guys go through on a day to day basis? They did nothing more than I've done in bars to fellow troopies who got mouthy.

These aren't cops. They have a different way of doing... business. Don't expect them to hold to YOUR moral standards... you're lucky they can hold onto any given what they deal with. That sucker is lucky they didn't skin him alive for what he'd played a part in. Personally, I think they showed remarkable restraint given the situation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top