See.
These sorts of things are USELESS absent conversation and debate.
For instance;
I would argue, strongly, that trans national corporations serve the interests of humanity. Medicine. Food. Building materials. Energy. Clothing. Good lord.
Yet, there is no answer for that so, presumably, if you strongly agree you get a totally opposite 'score' if you strongly disagree. :shrug:
Further, I would argue, strongly, that institutions and policy that claim TO serve humanity do, in fact HARM humanity as most, if not all, 'humanitarian' interests promote and codify dependence which, to me, while certainly human, just as slavery is 'human', also just as certainly, to me, is not in the interests of humanity.
Real world; 'humanitarians' can well be said to be opposed to the interests of corporations that, say, make a particularly toxic chemical and make much money off of it, yes? Those same 'humanitarians' signed the death sentences for untold millions of human beings who have died from malaria the last 40 year or so, well after some evil corporation found, for profit, a very effective solution, DDT.
So, who is serving the interests of humanity? :shrug:
