The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Now as I read this it’s not defining arms as anything except the generic, “Arms are any implement or device that is used to deter, threaten, and inflict physical damage, harm, or kill”. So technically arms are also knives. Now knives have a longer and more thorough history of usage back to the days of the constitution and never was there a restriction on the length of the blade. Presently most states and courts accept a folding blade up to three inches the constitutional test is arms (weapons) that are in common use (1) by law-abiding citizens, (2) for lawful purposes, get second amendment protection.
Would this say that a 6” belt knife is legal by this criteria?
Now as I read this it’s not defining arms as anything except the generic, “Arms are any implement or device that is used to deter, threaten, and inflict physical damage, harm, or kill”. So technically arms are also knives. Now knives have a longer and more thorough history of usage back to the days of the constitution and never was there a restriction on the length of the blade. Presently most states and courts accept a folding blade up to three inches the constitutional test is arms (weapons) that are in common use (1) by law-abiding citizens, (2) for lawful purposes, get second amendment protection.
Would this say that a 6” belt knife is legal by this criteria?