Has anyone else heard...........?

Penn

Dancing Up A Storm
:confused: That 13 democratic congressmen and women are advocating the United Nations oversee the national election for President of our United States?

They want to have the U.N. monitor the election results to ensure an accurate outcome of the final choice.

I saw it on the Abrams Report on MSNBC about 10 minutes ago.

The U. N.???
 

SmallTown

Football season!
I like the notion that was put forth that if the terrorists strike before the election, we should postpone the elections. This was the basis for my new sig.
 

Sharon

* * * * * * * * *
Staff member
PREMO Member
Originally posted by penncam
That 13 democratic congressmen and women haven't taken their medications and are advocating the United Nations oversee the national election for President of our United States?

Oh puhleeze! :silly: :drama: :flush:

Thirteen is such and unlucky number. :twitch:
 

Penn

Dancing Up A Storm
Re: Re: Has anyone else heard...........?

Originally posted by Sharon
Oh puhleeze! :silly: :drama: :flush:

Thirteen is such and unlucky number. :twitch:

:crazy: Yeah, and add to that they are liberal lefties who STILL think George W. Bush stole the last election.

Even after 4 separate news organizations reviewed the results and said it wasn't so!
 

Toxick

Splat
Originally posted by penncam
:confused: That 13 democratic congressmen and women are advocating the United Nations oversee the national election for President of our United States?


Maybe we should just up and totally cede our soveriegnty to the U.N.


Disband the congress and the supreme court. We can have the presidency turned into the Primary Ambassador, and Kofi Annan will be the actual leader of the Former US.




Idiots.
 

Penn

Dancing Up A Storm
:crazy:
Dear Mr. Secretary-General:

We, the undersigned Members of Congress, hereby request the Electoral Assistance Division of the United Nations Department of Political Affairs to send election observers to monitor the presidential election in the United States scheduled for November 2, 2004. We are deeply concerned that the right of U.S. citizens to vote in free and fair elections is again in jeopardy.


Sincerely,

Members of Congress,

Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)
Joseph Crowley (NY-07)
Raul Grijalva (AZ-07)
Danny K. Davis (IL-07)
Corrine Brown (FL-03)
Carolyn B. Maloney (NY-14)
Jerrold Nadler (NY-08)
Michael M. Honda
Elijah E. Cummings (MD-07)
Julia Carson (IN-07)
Edolphus Towns (NY- 10)

These people are seriously bonkers!

The Abrams Report I saw did not mention the fact that they'd drafted a letter to the Secretary General of the U.N.

OMG! :rolleyes:

Somewhere in the Book of Revelations, there is mention to the fact that the United States of America will cease to be a world power at the time of His Coming!


:cool: :confused: :frown:
 

Toxick

Splat
Originally posted by penncam
Somewhere in the Book of Revelations, there is mention to the fact that the United States of America will cease to be a world power at the time of His Coming!

Sort of.

There is a lot of symbolism which is most often interpreted to mean that the Antichrist leads a single entity global government which is branched into ten "kingdoms". Most people focus on the UN here because they're currently the closest thing we have to a one world government.

But there's no mention of specific countries rising or falling.



And a whole butt-load of other things have to happen before this global government is established.

Sleep easy.
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
Originally posted by penncam
:confused: That 13 democratic congressmen and women are advocating the United Nations oversee the national election for President of our United States?

They want to have the U.N. monitor the election results to ensure an accurate outcome of the final choice.

I saw it on the Abrams Report on MSNBC about 10 minutes ago.

The U. N.???
Yep, heard about it close to three weeks ago here on SOMD when Steve brought it to our attention. http://forums.somd.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=29547
 

jlabsher

Sorry about that chief.
Question. How can we complain about other countries not following "correct" election procedure and demanding that they allow UN AND US inspectors in their country during elections if we don't play by the same set of rules?

How better to prove to the world that we do things the correct way than letting them check us out? What are you guys afraid of, another Florida?
 
K

Kain99

Guest
Originally posted by jlabsher
How better to prove to the world that we do things the correct way than letting them check us out? What are you guys afraid of, another Florida?
I fear the U.S. looking like it is unable to regulate itself. We are not Zimbabwe for crying out loud. :frown:
 

SurfaceTension

New Member
Originally posted by jlabsher
What are you guys afraid of, another Florida?
If by "you guys" you mean us on the board, many believe that the US Supreme Court handled things well....They prevented the Florida court from re-writing the rules to suit them.

Of course, we all know what an honest, trustworthy organization the UN is, that would never put its interest before the American people's.

So what are you afraid of....Another Florida?
 

ylexot

Super Genius
Originally posted by jlabsher
Question. How can we complain about other countries not following "correct" election procedure and demanding that they allow UN AND US inspectors in their country during elections if we don't play by the same set of rules?
Simple. Those elections you speak of are very well known to be full of corruption. We want elections in other coutries to be elections by the people (that's what democracy is about). That doesn't happen when the election system is corrupt. The US is the model that many other countries have based their election systems on. Do you have any proof whatsoever of corruption in the US election system?
 

Frank

Chairman of the Board
Originally posted by jlabsher
Question. How can we complain about other countries not following "correct" election procedure and demanding that they allow UN AND US inspectors in their country during elections if we don't play by the same set of rules?


Most of the nations that get these monitors REQUEST them and usually for good reason. "We" (the US) do not 'force' election monitors on anyone.

It's one thing for a nation to want accurate elections because they've never had a free and fair election in their history. It's quite another for some disgruntled members of Congress, all Democrats, to make an appeal to a somewhat corrupt organization that does not answer to the American people, or anyone else, to validate the fairness of the election.

These people are still p*ssed at the last election, which, despite its outcome, WAS fair. The entire disenfranchisement myth is entirely without merit or anything.

Frankly, I'm disgusted by these guys.
 

ylexot

Super Genius
Originally posted by jlabsher
Actually an International Catholic group will oversee FL elections:

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0309-13.htm
Funny, nobody said they were invited. I don't think they will be allowed to "monitor" without an invitation to do so.
Originally posted by jlabsher
In 2002, a county in FL VOTED to have international observers at its elections:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2332315.stm

And the US government has "expressed disapproval" with elections in several countries in the past. (Like we have authority in other nations.)
But a spokesman for Miami-Dade's mayor has warned that the plan, approved after appeals from former US Attorney General Janet Reno and many in the county's black community, could be vetoed.
It was a 6-5 county commissioner vote.
 

Frank

Chairman of the Board
Apparently they're not as crooked as people want to believe. They had the election and won high praise. I wonder why they wasted all that money in the first place.

http://www.miami.com/mld/miami/4459148.htm?1c

Anyway, the question is still why on earth do we need it? The disenfranchisement baloney is ridiculous.
 
Top