Once again, nhboy demonstrates that his/her only skill is eye-poking. This post is probably the clearest indication yet that any sense of moral and/or intellectual discernment is beyond his/her ken. nhboy is like the "Tiger Beat" preteen or bourgeois salon self-important yakker who posts stuff thinking what he/she posts is clever, thought-provoking, and important when it is, in fact, mundane, pseudo-intellectual tripe. All we have here is a great example of "false equivalence."
But I'll take the bait and respond. In both cases we see a tragedy: a child has died because his/her parents couldn't deliver. In the latter case we have a tragedy as a result of the world's chaos, but (we assume) the parents tried to save the child. In the former, we have the tragedy of the parents deciding not to deliver (literally). Also, in the former, we have what is essentially a potential innocent victim of a drive-by: with abortion not only do the parents not try to save the child, THEY MURDER him/her (and do so predominately out of convenience). So while we can't save every child "OUT THERE," we can (must) do our best to save the innocent children HERE.
What nhboy is really saying is that the failure to save the child in the latter case negates our compassion for the former. Such ridiculous fake outage, pseudo-compassion, and virtue signaling! What a troll.