https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4343661-CH-to-M-Wolff-H-Holt-Co-Legal-Demand-Re-DJT.html
It's odd that the letter cites federal cases but implicates state law to be interpreted. Amateurish would be a better word. Since Trump is known not to pay his legal bills, I'm guessing this is the best he could do.
Nonetheless, it's difficult to see how the president will be able to prove damages, and the burden of proof will be on Trump to prove these things are false. He'll also have to prove malice to collect any punitive damages. I doubt this will go far, as Trump will not want a case in which he's the sitting president to go to trial. This of course lends significant authenticity to the statements in the book.
Trump gets played.
Again.
It's odd that the letter cites federal cases but implicates state law to be interpreted. Amateurish would be a better word. Since Trump is known not to pay his legal bills, I'm guessing this is the best he could do.
Nonetheless, it's difficult to see how the president will be able to prove damages, and the burden of proof will be on Trump to prove these things are false. He'll also have to prove malice to collect any punitive damages. I doubt this will go far, as Trump will not want a case in which he's the sitting president to go to trial. This of course lends significant authenticity to the statements in the book.
Trump gets played.
Again.