Is The Second Amendment Worth Dying For?

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Here it must be said that the Second Amendment was not meant to safeguard the right to hunt deer or shoot clay pigeons, or even protect your home and family from an intruder. The right to bear arms stems from the right of revolution, which is asserted in the Declaration of Independence and forms the basis of America’s social compact. Our republic was forged in revolution, and the American people have always retained the right to overthrow their government if it becomes tyrannical. That doesn’t mean that private militias should have tanks and missile launchers, but it does mean that revolution—the right of first principles—undergirds our entire political system.

That might sound academic or outlandish next to the real-life horror of a school shooting, but the fact remains that we can’t simply wave off the Second Amendment any more than we can wave off the First, or the Fourth, or any of them. They are constitutive elements of the American idea, without which the entire constitutional system would eventually collapse.

In this, America is unlike the European nations that gun control advocates like to compare it with. Germany can restrict the right to bear arms as easily as it can—and does—restrict free speech. Not so in America. If we want to change that, it will involve a substantial diminishment of our constitutional rights as we have known them up until now. After last week’s school shooting, some Americans are okay with that, especially those families who are grieving. But I suspect most Americans are not willing to make that trade-off, and might never be—unless they suffer the same of kind personal loss.

Returning to Wallace’s thought experiment, we might rephrase it like this: is the Second Amendment worth dying for? That’s another way of asking what the American idea is worth. It’s not an easy question, and I don’t pose it lightly, as I’m sure Wallace didn’t.


Is The Second Amendment Worth Dying For?
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
yeah but in the context of today mass shootings ....

Progressives are saying is it still worth it, why do people need semi automatic firearms with hi cap mags RE: Sappy and Trans / TJ
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
yeah but in the context of today mass shootings ....

Progressives are saying is it still worth it, why do people need semi automatic firearms with hi cap mags RE: Sappy and Trans / TJ

If you still believe our constitution is the governing law of the land, and that it is in place to protect us from tyranny and an intrusive, liberty destroying government, then it is most certainly worth dying for. Repeal the 2nd (liberty's teeth) and all other rights are gone. We have no means to protect ourselves from tyranny.

Progressives believe that it's the 2nd amendment that is the reason for the school shootings. The reality is, it's the destruction of 2A that has allowed these shootings to happen. We, the people, according to our founders, were to be well-armed at all times. We have allowed our government to strip this away from us, leaving us helpless to people that will abuse our liberties. Progressives have it completely backwards.

The only places these people attack are soft targets; places they know guns don't exist. Then they call in people with guns to save them; when it's too late.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
The real question is:
Is the United States of America worth dying for.

Without the First and Second Amendments we no longer will have a United States as we know it.

So Yes, It's worth dying for. As those pushing for it's abolishment may find out one day.
 
Top