Trump wrong? Say it isn't so!!

[transporter]

This really shouldn't come as news. Trump doesn't know what facts are. He can't even bother to take the time to learn the facts when he is sitting in a meeting with another head of state.

https://www.apnews.com/4e79e03ed543...ECK:-Trump-wrong-on-Russia-collusion-question

 

[Hijinx]

This really shouldn't come as news. Trump doesn't know what facts are. He can't even bother to take the time to learn the facts when he is sitting in a meeting with another head of state.

https://www.apnews.com/4e79e03ed543...ECK:-Trump-wrong-on-Russia-collusion-question

Pure BS, the head of the Committee said there was no collusion and Schiff has nothing but his dick to play with in his accusations otherwise.

 

[Monello]

It isn't so.

 

[littlelady]

It isn't so.

 

[PsyOps]

From the article:

TRUMP: “As the House Intelligence Committee has concluded, there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump Campaign. As many are now finding out, however, there was tremendous leaking, lying and corruption at the highest levels of the FBI, Justice & State.” — tweet.

THE FACTS: He’s wrong. That conclusion came from Republicans on the committee; it was not a committee finding. Democrats on the committee sharply dispute the Republican conclusions and will issue their own.

I said this at the time... if the dems on the committee have anything to show collusion come out with it; otherwise I have no reason to no believe the republicans take on this. They say they found no evidence and the dems come up empty. What other conclusion can ordinary folks like me come to than there is no evidence.

You people on the left wanting there to be doesn't somehow transform into "there is".

 

[Merlin99]

From the article:

TRUMP: “As the House Intelligence Committee has concluded, there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump Campaign. As many are now finding out, however, there was tremendous leaking, lying and corruption at the highest levels of the FBI, Justice & State.” — tweet.

THE FACTS: He’s wrong. That conclusion came from Republicans on the committee; it was not a committee finding. Democrats on the committee sharply dispute the Republican conclusions and will issue their own.

I said this at the time... if the dems on the committee have anything to show collusion come out with it; otherwise I have no reason to no believe the republicans take on this. They say they found no evidence and the dems come up empty. What other conclusion can ordinary folks like me come to than there is no evidence.

You people on the left wanting there to be doesn't somehow transform into "there is".

The house intelligence committee has similar rules to the SC, majority rules. Therefore if the majority of the committee are R's and they say the there is no collusion, ipso facto there is no collusion.

 

[PsyOps]

The house intelligence committee has similar rules to the SC, majority rules. Therefore if the majority of the committee are R's and they say the there is no collusion, ipso facto there is no collusion.

Sure enough. But, if dems are crying they have evidence, then let's call their bluff and demand they produce it.

 

[Hijinx]

Sure enough. But, if dems are crying they have evidence, then let's call their bluff and demand they produce it.

Sh1t or get off the pot time for Schiff.
Put up or shut up.

 

[awpitt]

The house intelligence committee has similar rules to the SC, majority rules. Therefore if the majority of the committee are R's and they say the there is no collusion, ipso facto there is no collusion.

If the majority of the committee are R's and they say the Moon is a planet, then I guess the Moon is a planet. Legislative committees don't make final determinations. They make recommendations to be acted upon by the full chamber.

 

[This_person]

If the majority of the committee are R's and they say the Moon is a planet, then I guess the Moon is a planet. Legislative committees don't make final determinations. They make recommendations to be acted upon by the full chamber.

You’re going way beyond the point. Trump said, “the committee concluded...” and the article said, “nuh uh, ‘cuz it wasn’t unanimous.”

The full chamber is not a part of the issue being discussed

 

[SamSpade]

You’re going way beyond the point. Trump said, “the committee concluded...” and the article said, “nuh uh, ‘cuz it wasn’t unanimous.”

The full chamber is not a part of the issue being discussed

That was precisely my take away from it. The committee is done.
That the Dems on it disagreed is irrelevant.

 

[PsyOps]

If the majority of the committee are R's and they say the Moon is a planet, then I guess the Moon is a planet. Legislative committees don't make final determinations. They make recommendations to be acted upon by the full chamber.

Then what are they waiting for? Where's the evidence of collusion?

 

[Lurk]

Then what are they waiting for? Where's the evidence of collusion?

That too isn't so.

 

[Hijinx]

That too isn't so.

If the Committee says it's done they should vote to fire Mueller and his Government tit sucking Democrat shysters.

 

[black dog]

This really shouldn't come as news. Trump doesn't know what facts are. He can't even bother to take the time to learn the facts when he is sitting in a meeting with another head of state.

https://www.apnews.com/4e79e03ed543...ECK:-Trump-wrong-on-Russia-collusion-question

Maybe he will get Impeached this week and all of your life's problems will be solved.