“Do you believe that gay sex is a perversion?”

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Booker’s line of questioning is simply astounding—and inappropriate.

He presumes, almost out of thin air, to set a new non-negotiable standard for anyone who wants to hold executive office: You must be completely on board with same-sex marriage, you must affirm gay sex, and you must espouse these convictions openly.

This kind of thought policing is becoming a trend for politicians on the left.

[clip]

Just as LGBT activists now seek to punish religious Americans in courts of law, liberal politicians like Booker seek to purge the remaining dissenters from polite society. In the world of Cory Booker, there is no place for Mike Pompeo—except perhaps, in a re-education class. Certainly not in the Cabinet.

This sort of social ostracization and occupational discrimination was coming, but liberals long denied it. They assured us that same-sex marriage would make the world more tolerant, that conservative holdouts would have nothing to fear, and that the progressive future would have a place for everyone.

Indeed, some liberals of yesteryear would have flinched hard at Booker’s rigid questioning of Pompeo over something as seemingly peripheral as gay sex. These liberals either failed to see just how coercive their movement would become, or they knew better and were just placating America while cultural changes gained steam—and then jumped on board the train.

Justice Samuel Alito was very prescient in his 2015 dissent to the Obergefell decision: “I assume that those who cling to old beliefs will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes, but if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and treated as such by governments, employers, and schools.” And, we should now add, senators.


https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/04...o-marriage-views-is-about-keeping-you-silent/
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
I think liberals are all perverts, obsessed with not only sex but the sex lives of complete strangers.

Cory Booker should be told to mind his own business and not worry about what other people are doing for sex.
 

MiddleGround

Well-Known Member
Nope. Gay sex is merely a "byproduct."

Being gay in the first place is the perversion. According to the definition of the word "perversion."
 

black dog

Free America
Most likely in the next few years, Cory Booker with be arrested for kiddie porn, perverted sexual acts in the parks restroom, wacking in the car while driving next to a school bus full of girls, getting caught wacking off another man in a adult movie theater, kid porn on his laptop.....
And so on..
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
If some misguided fools want to fornicate or do fellation with other males.
or women want to have oral or penetration sex with toys and other things that is their right to do so.

Is it perversion?? Yes. Maybe that is the exciting part for them.
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
Or Pompeo could have answered like a reasonable adult and said

"While I am not a homosexual in the role i am seeking I will be responsible for the national safety and some of the nation is homosexual. I promise my views on homosexuality won't taint my ability to do my job one way or another"


Just like many people have said about their view on abortion when seeking a role in the government..
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
I think if someone asks a completely inappropriate question in a setting such as this, it's perfectly acceptable to answer with an insulting answer.
Because unless you embarrass these guys with such language they'll keep doing it.
I've maintained for years my saying "when there are no consequences for a behavior, there's no reason to ever stop it".
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
Or Pompeo could have answered like a reasonable adult and said

"While I am not a homosexual in the role i am seeking I will be responsible for the national safety and some of the nation is homosexual. I promise my views on homosexuality won't taint my ability to do my job one way or another"


Just like many people have said about their view on abortion when seeking a role in the government..

Or, Booker could have said (with respect to homosexual sexual relations and their impact on Pompeo's role) " ". Because, that's all that needed to be said.
 

black dog

Free America
If some misguided fools want to fornicate or do fellation with other males.
or women want to have oral or penetration sex with toys and other things that is their right to do so.

Is it perversion?? Yes. Maybe that is the exciting part for them.

That's pretty vanilla in the world of sex. The Greeks rolled better than that.
 

black dog

Free America
I think if someone asks a completely inappropriate question in a setting such as this, it's perfectly acceptable to answer with an insulting answer.
Because unless you embarrass these guys with such language they'll keep doing it.
I've maintained for years my saying "when there are no consequences for a behavior, there's no reason to ever stop it".

I've never been embarrassed with my poor language usage. When someone tries to embarrass me, I just point at his stupid man bun or her lack of breasts and mock them back.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
"While I am not a homosexual in the role i am seeking I will be responsible for the national safety and some of the nation is homosexual. I promise my views on homosexuality won't taint my ability to do my job one way or another"

And then Booker would go, "Heh. You said 'taint'."
 

Monello

Smarter than the average bear
PREMO Member
Cory reminds me of this guy.

bae63073b178d444de9f105944058d9c--grown-man-airplane-humor.jpg
 

b23hqb

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Well, at least some of the replies in this thread are using the appropriate word - homosexual - instead of that three letter word used today to try and soften what they really are - homosexuals. That's a start, I guess.

"are you seeking a date, Senator?":lmao: That was funny, This person.
 
Last edited:

black dog

Free America
Well, at least the replies in this thread are using the appropriate word - homosexual - instead of that three letter word used today to try and soften what they really are - homosexuals. Tht's a start, I guess.

F@g is a soft word?
 
Top