Now it will be up to the state attorney general's office to defend the state's "revenge porn" law, which was passed in 2015 and punishes those who post intimate images from previous or current relationships online.
The Tyler-based 12th Court of Appeals said the law is unconstitutional because it's too broad and infringes on free speech, The Texas Tribune reported.
In his findings in the case, Chief Justice James Worthen said the First Amendment usually prohibits "content-based" restrictions.
The court also said that the law was vague and infringed on the rights of third parties who might unwittingly share intimate images, according to the Associated Press.
Sharing nude photos of current or ex-partners protected under First Amendment, court rules
The Tyler-based 12th Court of Appeals said the law is unconstitutional because it's too broad and infringes on free speech, The Texas Tribune reported.
In his findings in the case, Chief Justice James Worthen said the First Amendment usually prohibits "content-based" restrictions.
The court also said that the law was vague and infringed on the rights of third parties who might unwittingly share intimate images, according to the Associated Press.
Sharing nude photos of current or ex-partners protected under First Amendment, court rules