except TRUMP or any "R"....I'm guessing Democrat or left-wing. And I am guessing, they did it because being critical of government leaders undermines the public's trust in its government.
The VERY SAME argument I've heard used in Communist nations.
If I read it right, the government was trying to sue the paper ---except TRUMP or any "R"....
They can if they can show that there was "actual malice" in what was printed. This was spelled out in New York Times v Sullivan when the NYT was deemed not to be libelous.If I read it right, the government was trying to sue the paper ---
THE VERY THING the first amendment was written to halt. It doesn't matter HOW insulting or even libelous - the government cannot sue a newspaper.
Factual error, content defamatory of official reputation, or both, are insufficient to warrant an award of damages for false statements unless "actual malice" — knowledge that statements are false or in reckless disregard of the truth — is alleged and proved.