A Day That Ends in Y Democrats Lying
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
WingsOfGold
Well-Known Member
If he were shotn and killed we might have heard about it
Latest Epstein Emails About Trump Appear To Be Just Another Misleading Democrat Info Op
Democrats are essentially asking you to give Epstein credibility he does not deserve. After he was publicly outed for his behavior, who knows what Epstein’s motives might have been to smear Trump? He’s clearly thinking about ways to protect himself in these emails, and not entirely reliable.
All of these obvious issues should make these emails a nonstory, especially given the sources and their demonstrable willingness to obscure exculpatory information for Trump.
Another basic fact that must be addressed is that the supposedly incriminating emails in this story have been knocking around for many years, and the “dog that hasn’t barked” email is 14 years old. We’re supposed to believe that after all the illegal leaks against Trump, his tax returns being leaked, and the massive coordination across all levels of government during his first term to lie about his involvement in Russia collusion and feed the press damaging stories, that they’re just now discovering damning emails tying him to Jeffrey Epstein?
That the Biden information had full access to the Epstein files for the previous four years, and despite raiding Trump’s home, launching abusive criminal investigations against anyone in his orbit, and coordinating lawfare efforts against him across multiple jurisdictions — they just didn’t bother combing through all the Epstein files and releasing all the damning information Democrats suddenly assure us is being hidden now that Trump is president again?
In this case, it’s much more likely that Democrats in Congress squinted at the Epstein docs long enough that they realized that if they selectively released certain emails and blacked out a key name, they could probably get away with saying they were trying to protect one of Epstein’s victims, instead of hiding exonerating information for Trump.
The left is pushing another desperate anti-Trump hoax – a false Epstein smear campaign
On Wednesday, House Oversight Committee Democrats selectively released three emails among 23,000 handed over by the estate of the late pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein to try to implicate Donald Trump, yet again, in Epstein’s sexual abuse of underage girls.
Of course, the Oversight Dems, who include such adornments to Congress as Jasmine Crockett, Ayanna Pressley and Rashida Tlaib, left out crucial information that exonerated the president, instead claiming the emails “raise serious questions about Donald Trump and his knowledge of Epstein’s horrific crimes.”
Cleared Don already
In the first email, Epstein writes to his now-jailed pimp Ghislaine Maxwell on April 2, 2011: “i want you to realize that that dog that hasn’t barked is trump. [Redacted name of victim] spent hours at my house with him , he has never once been mentioned. police chief. etc. im 75 % there.”The Epstein victim whose name the Democrats gratuitously left out was Virginia Giuffre.
But we have already heard from her repeatedly, both under oath and in her posthumously released memoir, and she consistently states that Donald Trump was not involved in her abuse by Epstein, Maxwell, the British royal formerly known as Prince Andrew and others.
Giuffre never wavered in her statements that she knew nothing to implicate Trump in Epstein’s sordid crimes with girls mainly aged 14 to 17.
She committed suicide earlier this year, and now the Democrats are cynically using her tragedy as a weapon against Trump who she has explicitly absolved, over and over.
In a 2016 deposition, Giuffre said Trump “didn’t partake in any sex with us [and] never flirted with me.”
In her memoir “Nobody’s Girl,” she said Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing and “couldn’t have been friendlier” when she worked at his Palm Beach, Fla., resort Mar-a-Lago as a teenager before Maxwell recruited her.
Furious White House reveals Jeffrey Epstein victim who ‘spent hours’ with Trump — and always said he never did anything wrong
House Democrats pulled a bait-and-switch on a new trove of Jeffrey Epstein documents Wednesday when they released just three select emails in which the pedophile financier mentioned President Trump, including one claiming, “Victim 1 spent many hours at my house with him.”
[clip]
“The Democrats selectively leaked emails to the liberal media to create a fake narrative to smear President Trump,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told The Post in a statement.
“The ‘unnamed victim’ referenced in these emails is the late Virginia Giuffre, who repeatedly said President Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing whatsoever and ‘couldn’t have been friendlier’ to her in their limited interactions.
“These stories are nothing more than bad-faith efforts to distract from President Trump’s historic accomplishments, and any American with common sense sees right through this hoax and clear distraction from the government opening back up again.”
Among the 21 Dems on the House Oversight committee are Ranking Member Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), Vice Ranking Member Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas), and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Republicans on the Oversight Committee released the full trove of 20,000 documents.
Democrats Released Three Cherrypicked Epstein Emails... So the GOP Released 20,000
Democrats thought they had a winning hand when they released three carefully selected Jeffrey Epstein emails on Wednesday morning. The timing was no accident. With their caucus still reeling from their base turning on them for caving on the government shutdown, they needed a distraction, and they believed these emails would deliver one. They were wrong.
[clip]
Leavitt went further, reminding everyone of what actually happened between Trump and Epstein. "The fact remains that President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club decades ago for being a creep to his female employees, including Giuffre," she explained. "These stories are nothing more than bad-faith efforts to distract from President Trump's historic accomplishments, and any American with common sense sees right through this hoax and clear distraction from the government opening back up again."
The emails were quickly revealed to be exactly what they appeared to be: a nothingburger. Even the media couldn't deny it. But here's where it gets interesting. Republicans on the House Oversight Committee decided to respond by releasing the entire trove of 20,000 documents they obtained from the estate of Jeffrey Epstein. All of them. Every single page.
And according to the New York Times, Democrats were livid:
Someone was talking about the BBC fake news thing on...I think it was Laura Ingraham? One of them. Anyway, he very earnestly said it's unprecedented that a trusted news outlet would blatantly falsify a news story like that.
So apparently he is unaware of CNN/MSNBC/ABC/CBS/NBC? Has never heard of Dan Rather? Or Michael Isikoff? Or the Washington Post? New York Times?
It's pretty amazing he'd say something like that right on global TV.
So apparently he is unaware of CNN/MSNBC/ABC/CBS/NBC? Has never heard of Dan Rather? Or Michael Isikoff? Or the Washington Post? New York Times?
It's pretty amazing he'd say something like that right on global TV.
Yesterday morning, I mentioned the Democrats’ Trump-Epstein hoax, and what do you know? It flared up again, uglier than stink on a monkey, only to be squashed by the banana tree of reality. (I know. Sorry.) That was just the sideshow. The bigger news was that Representative Thomas Massie’s long-pending Epstein petition gained the final vote it needed. CNN reported the result in a story headlined, “Johnson says House will vote next week on push to compel DOJ to release all of its Epstein files.”
Brave Thomas Massie will finally get his vote! On the record. And I’ll bet it passes overwhelmingly. In fact, key Trump allies and MAGA stalwarts have already signed Massie’s petition, including Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), and Lauren Boebert (R-Co.).
But let’s reel in our enthusiastic expectations. First of all, James Comer and the House Oversight Committee have already subpoenaed the DOJ’s Epstein file. So that is already ongoing. In fact, yesterday, Oversight released 20,000 new pages of documents obtained from the late sex offender’s estate. I think they’re closing in on having released 100,000 pages in total.
Second, the history of Congress “compelling” the DOJ to disclose stuff is, well, inconclusive. In 2011, Congress tried to compel the DOJ to turn over “Fast and Furious” files. The DOJ resisted, citing privilege and separation of powers. In 2019, Congress tried to compel the DOJ to turn over “Russiagate” documents related to the Mueller investigation. Same thing happened.
So … while Congress can vote for the DOJ to release stuff, it can’t really make the DOJ do anything. If they do, there will be a lot of political pressure, but don’t expect bankers’ boxes to start rolling up to the curb or anything.
Still. There’s a whiff of something different in the air this time. CNN’s article expressed surprise at Johnson’s agreement to hold the vote next week. He could have waited till next year, or at least for seven full days, depending on whose rule interpretation you prefer. But Speaker Johnson said let’s just get on with it: “It’s a totally pointless exercise. We might as well just do it. I mean, they have 218 signatures, that’s fine, we’ll do it.”
Which brings us to the Democrat’s latest Epstein misfire.
Before she unalived herself this year, Epstein victim Virginia Guiffre was extremely public about her experience. She sued Epstein’s estate, wrote a book, and her deposition transcript has been widely circulated. Virginia’s lawyer once praised Trump as the only involved party who cooperated voluntarily, without even requiring subpoenas.
In her deposition, Virginia repeatedly said Trump never did anything inappropriate that she knew of. “It’s true that he didn’t partake in any sex with us,” she testified, “and it’s not true that he flirted with me. Donald Trump never flirted with me.”
Critically, Virginia had worked for both men. She started at Mar-a-Lago, working for Trump. Then Epstein “stole” her, hiring her away from Trump, starting a sordid trend that appears to have eventually led to Trump throwing Epstein out of his club.
Yesterday, Democrats released an email they claimed “proved” Trump was part of Epstein’s intimates group:
Democrats added the redaction, “VICTIM.” The original email —released unredacted by the GOP-controlled House Oversight Committee— did not conceal the name of the “VICTIM.” It was “Virginia.”
In other words, Epstein was talking about the girl who already exculpated the President. The girl who, postmortem, took down Prince Andrew.
The Democrats’ smear attempt spectacularly backfired. When Epstein said, “the dog that hasn’t barked is trump … im 75% there,” he was speculating about being almost fully convinced Trump was cooperating against him with the Palm Beach County Sheriff. As it turned out, Epstein was right. It was Trump.
Virginia was the link. Epstein concluded that Trump was capitalizing on his previous relationship with Virginia— from when they knew each other at Mar-a-Lago. Epstein was suspicious because Trump had visited Virginia, but she failed to “mention” it. Epstein appears to have thought Trump was wearing a wire. (And maybe he was.)
Early in the day, running with the Democrats’ redacted version, corporate media tried to launch a political scud missile at Trump, but it prematurely exploded into infertile embarrassment when the House Oversight Committee promptly published the unredacted email, which provided the missing context.
Much more interesting were other newly disclosed emails showing anti-Trump reporters, like Michael Wolff (USA Today, Vanity Fair), coordinating Trump attacks with Epstein. Years after Epstein’s first conviction.
Or, just before Epstein’s second arrest in 2017, we see New York Times reporter Landon Thomas prompting the pedophile with a heads-up that a new investigation was underway:
In other words, here we have liberal reporters secretly conspiring with a notorious pedophile and sex-trafficker like close comrades. It’s almost like they never met a well-connected pedophile they didn’t instantly fall in love with.
Now let’s stitch yesterday’s Epstein news together and see what sort of mittens it makes.When the House inevitably votes next week to compel the DOJ to release the full Epstein files, and assuming the DOJ fully or even partly complies (why not?) … then what?
Democrats are convinced the files are packed with dirt on President Trump. If so, Trump’s resistance to their release will have been the biggest political miscalculation of all time, since it made the interest in the Epstein materials swell to a fever pitch. If the documents were coming out anyway, he could have released the files on day one, back when Democrats couldn’t care less about Epstein.
Or there isn’t any dirt on Trump … but the files will still be ugly, for a lot of folks other than Trump, including some Republicans. But this way, with Democrats and Republicans voting together to compel the release of the files, Trump can’t be blamed, and Republicans can’t be blamed.
If some billionaire donor or Republican politician gets exposed for island-hopping, it won’t have been Trump’s fault.
We shall see. I’ll update you after next week’s vote.
☕️ SWAMP CRITTERS ☙ Thursday, November 13, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Open season in the swamp: DOJ nets top Dem operatives; Arizona’s Katie Hobbs probed for bribery tied to a grim orphanage; Epstein disclosures loom; DNC staff revolt; another Ivy caves and dumps DEI.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
Dem Tells People to Ignore Epstein Victim's Testimony Clearing Trump, Takes It a VILE Step Further (Vid)
Dem Rep. Melanie Stansbury makes shocking comments about Trump and an Epstein victim's testimony.
Rep. Tim Burchett Put House Dems' Demand to Release Epstein Files to the Test (Guess What Happened Next)
Rep. Burchett challenges Democrats on Epstein files amid political tensions.
tldr;
"Wah, we lost the shutdown war so we need to start hammering Epstein to distract!"
"Wah, we lost the shutdown war so we need to start hammering Epstein to distract!"
There's just one problem with Casten's conspiracy theory: Trump was president at the time and spent Thanksgiving at Mar-a-Lago, as White House records and countless news reports confirm. Apparently, Casten expects Americans to believe that a sitting president somehow managed to spend the holiday with a known sexual predator without anyone noticing. The claim is so ridiculous it barely deserves a response, yet here we are. Countless people have shared the same screenshot and treated it as gospel truth, elevating an easy disproven falsehood, knowing that as long as enough people see it, enough will go to their graves believing it to be true.
The truly ironic part of this whole mess is that Epstein’s claim about spending Thanksgiving with Trump actually undermines his own credibility. Why? Well, if Epstein was telling people he was meeting with Trump while president, it raises serious questions about everything else he ever said regarding his relationship with Trump. Was he exaggerating to make himself seem more important? Was he trying to inflate his influence or ego by claiming connections that didn’t exist? The more you examine it, the clearer it becomes that anything Epstein said about his relationship with Trump has to be taken with an enormous grain of salt.
Casten's wild accusation came after House Oversight Democrats released three emails they insisted "raise serious questions about Donald Trump and his knowledge of Epstein's horrific crimes." The emails, obtained from Epstein's estate, turned out to be nothing but innuendo, and the story was easily debunked by PJ Media and other outlets who simply read the emails in question.
Meanwhile, another email is also gaining traction on the left. In it, Epstein wrote "I have met some very bad people. None as bad as Trump. Not one decent cell in his body." Democrats seem to think this is some kind of gotcha moment. Stop the presses! Epstein didn’t like Donald Trump! The horror!
If you’re having trouble following their logic, you’re not alone. They're literally trying to destroy Trump by linking him to Epstein while simultaneously using Epstein's own words as character evidence against Trump.
The Democratic Party even joined the pile-on with a post on X.
Democrats Humiliate Themselves With Claim That Trump Spent Thanksgiving 2017 With Epstein
Democrats' absurd claims linking Trump to Epstein fail as facts debunk their conspiracy theories.
Humiliated Dems Forced to Delete Latest False Claim About Epstein and Trump
Democrats were left with a heaping helping of egg on their face after another attempt to link President Trump to Jeffrey Epstein failed, forcing them to scramble to delete the flimsy "evidence" involving their latest baseless claim.
The Democratic National Committee's official X account on Thursday posted and then quickly deleted a claim alleging the President spent Thanksgiving 2017 with Jeffrey Epstein.
Using incredibly out-of-context emails, the DNC made it clear that they were offering evidence that "documents show Donald Trump spent Thanksgiving with Jeffrey Epstein in 2017."
Whoever pushed out that message clearly struggles with reading comprehension and didn't for a moment wonder about the plausibility of the leader of the free world sneaking out of Turkey Day celebrations to pal around with a convicted sex offender for a few hours ... without anybody noticing.
The email exchange posted by @TheDemocrats, whose X bio links to the official DNC website, which states, "We are the Democratic party," shows Epstein discussing Thanksgiving Day plans with Faith Kates, founder of NEXT Model Management. Amid the exchange, Kates asks, "Who else is down there?"
Epstein mentions Trump's name, but there is zero indication he is speaking specifically, and not simply pointing out that the President is in the South Florida area. There's also one minor issue with the drivel the Democrats were trying to push here: Public records show Trump hosted family at Mar-a-Lago and joined a video call with U.S. troops on Thanksgiving in 2017.
There is no evidence of Epstein's attendance at his place, or vice versa. Additionally, CNN reported that Trump had visited the nearby Coast Guard Quarters that day. All in all, a pretty busy, well-documented day.
Thus far, the bombshell story they are putting out to their friends in the media has backfired spectacularly:
- The initial email release listed a "victim" of Epstein's who "spent hours" with Trump. Democrats redacted the name intentionally because it was Virginia Giuffre, a woman who had stated under oath that the President never acted inappropriately with her and that she never saw him with Epstein.
- One of the emails literally states that Trump directed Ghislaine Maxwell to "stop" what they were doing regarding "the girls," coinciding with the fact that the President, according to White House communications director Steven Cheung, had kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago for “being a creep.”
- Democrats were given the opportunity to expedite the release of all remaining Epstein files, but opted not to do so. They're not interested in the truth; they only want selective release. It's the Russia hoax playbook all over again.
- They released emails purported to show that Trump and Epstein were extremely close, then immediately released others that thoroughly contradict the narrative of their alleged closeness.
- And now, they had to pull down libelous claims that the pair hung out on Thanksgiving.