Ah Yes ... Acceptance of Gays - Next Pedo's or Incest
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
Here’s What’s In The ‘Obscene’ Books Being Removed From Schools Across The Country
“Parents across the country have organically risen to fight the obviously age-inappropriate material that has crept into public schools,” Brooke Stephens, a member of Utah Parents United, a group focused on parental rights in education, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Once they see it, they know it’s wrong and they won’t give up until it’s gone.”
“Gender Queer” the most challenged book in schools, is about a character with “e/em/eir” pronouns navigating being queer. The book contains cartoon images of a boy masturbating and performing oral sex on another man.
“All Boys Aren’t Blue,” a memoir about the experience of a black queer boy growing up, does not contain graphic images but describes graphic sexual encounters.
“He reached his hand down and pulled out my dick,” “All Boys Aren’t Blue” states. “He quickly went to giving me head. I just sat back and enjoyed it as I could tell he was, too.”
New York Times editorial board says right-wing paramilitary groups are showing up at anti-LGBTQ protests
You’d think there’d be two sides to this story: those who think Drag Queen Story Hour teaches tolerance to young children, and those who think Drag Queen Story Hour sexualizes them. But there’s no indication in the New York Times editorial board’s piece that there’s “another side” — Drag Queen Story Hour is as good as all of the people who participate say it is. Why, we should bring together toddlers and drag queens as much as possible.
There’s a reason this editor is doing a post on this tweet that isn’t getting much engagement: a paramilitary group did show up at a “family-friendly” drag show in Texas. That paramilitary group was Antifa, and they were carrying pride flags along with their AR-15s, standing guard over the drag brunch. We’d think that parents bringing small children to a drag show would be wary of people open-carrying right outside, but we didn’t hear any complaints. Look:
So, no, New York Times, this is not a right-wing paramilitary group.
The editorial board’s evidence that right-wing paramilitary groups are joining protesters at anti-LGBTQ events is a pellet shot through the front window of the Brewmaster’s Taproom in Renton, Washington. The only other example is a “shouting match.”
The editorial board writes as part of its series, “The Danger Within”:
We thought “riots” were the language of the unheard.
Federal Judge Says School Hiding Kids’ Gender Transitions Doesn’t ‘Shock The Conscience,’ Throws Out Parent Lawsuit
“While the court is apprehensive about the alleged policy and actions of the Ludlow Public Schools with regard to parental notification, it cannot conclude the decision to withhold information” about the children from their parents meets the conscience-shocking legal standard in Massachusetts, the judge wrote in his December 14 ruling.
Back in April, parents Stephen Foote and Marissa Silvestri filed a lawsuit in Massachusetts federal court against staff members at Paul R. Baird Middle School, as well as the elected school committee, and the town of Ludlow just east of Springfield, Massachusetts.
School officials “impermissibly inserted themselves into the private realm” of their family, violating their “rights to make decisions regarding their children’s upbringing, mental health, and well-being,” the parents wrote in their suit.
A federal judge essentially says parents have no rights over their children
In other words, said a federal judge, for schools to keep a profound secret about a child who has ostensibly made a decision that could alter the child’s entire life—surgeries, hormones, suicide, substance abuse—is no big deal. It’s a little worrisome, sure, but why should anyone get upset about it? As the Kinks once sang, “Girls will be boys and boys will be girls. It’s a mixed up, muddled up, shook up world….” Get with the transgender times, man!
No!
The heck with that. That is not true. Parents love their children; the state does not. The state’s only goal is power, while a parent’s only goal is for his or her child to have the best possible life. It is madness for anyone to give priority to a state that wants to turn children into gender-free widgets who have loyalty only to the government.
And another thing (a phrase I’ve long wanted to write): What kind of 11-year-old expresses herself as that child allegedly did? Anyone with a brain—that is, a parent who knows young people—knows that the letter’s business-like tone is utterly alien to a child. That is the kind of letter that an adult writes, and I’m willing to bet that some social worker, administrator, or teacher not only wrote the letter but was behind the transition.
Ludlow used to be a moderately conservative community.
The seepage of Liberal cess fleeing the expense of eastern Mass. has been eroding that the past few decades.
The seepage of Liberal cess fleeing the expense of eastern Mass. has been eroding that the past few decades.
Sneakers
Just sneakin' around....
That's where I learned to ski. Okemo Mt.
Okemo is Ludlow, VT, above story is Ludlow, MA.
I'm from West Springfield and the Mrs. is from Wilbraham, both near Ludlow, MA.
Sneakers
Just sneakin' around....
My bad. Didn't know there was a Ludlow, MA.
Tis why we have the conversation.
“sex … is an immutable characteristic determined solely by the accident of birth”
First, you’ll be encouraged that at least seven out of twelve judges on the Court found that Drew Adams is a biological girl, period. Her “gender identity” is completely different from whether under the law she is a girl or not. Boys bathrooms are for boys, not for girls who dress like boys:
Next, the Court cited the Frontiero case, in which the U.S. Supreme Court said that “sex … is an immutable characteristic determined solely by the accident of birth:”
In saying sex is immutable, they meant it cannot be changed. The majority seemed intrigued by the concept of “gender fluidity,” which seems to imply something more “mutable” than “immutable.” In saying that sex is determined SOLELY by birth, they meant you can’t change it next Wednesday based on how you are feeling at the moment, or for any other reason. The Court explained, “There is simply no alternative definition of ‘sex’ for transgender persons as compared to non transgender persons.”
The Court wrote that biological differences between the sexes was the fundamental reason for constitutional and Title IX protections, holding “To fail to acknowledge even our most basic biological differences . . . risks making the guarantee of equal protection superficial, and so disserving it.”
In what should be, but isn’t, entirely uncontroversial, the Court also recognized that non-trans kids have protectable privacy rights in the bathroom, explaining that “the protection of individual privacy will occasionally require some segregation between the sexes is beyond doubt.” The majority rejected the lower court’s argument that Drew didn’t violate anyone’s privacy because she just used a private stall and then left the bathroom. But the Court disagreed, explaining the boy’s bathroom also has undivided urinals, and students change clothes in there.
In other words, ALL students’ privacy begins at the bathroom door.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
First, you’ll be encouraged that at least seven out of twelve judges on the Court found that Drew Adams is a biological girl, period. Her “gender identity” is completely different from whether under the law she is a girl or not. Boys bathrooms are for boys, not for girls who dress like boys:
Next, the Court cited the Frontiero case, in which the U.S. Supreme Court said that “sex … is an immutable characteristic determined solely by the accident of birth:”
In saying sex is immutable, they meant it cannot be changed. The majority seemed intrigued by the concept of “gender fluidity,” which seems to imply something more “mutable” than “immutable.” In saying that sex is determined SOLELY by birth, they meant you can’t change it next Wednesday based on how you are feeling at the moment, or for any other reason. The Court explained, “There is simply no alternative definition of ‘sex’ for transgender persons as compared to non transgender persons.”
The Court wrote that biological differences between the sexes was the fundamental reason for constitutional and Title IX protections, holding “To fail to acknowledge even our most basic biological differences . . . risks making the guarantee of equal protection superficial, and so disserving it.”
In what should be, but isn’t, entirely uncontroversial, the Court also recognized that non-trans kids have protectable privacy rights in the bathroom, explaining that “the protection of individual privacy will occasionally require some segregation between the sexes is beyond doubt.” The majority rejected the lower court’s argument that Drew didn’t violate anyone’s privacy because she just used a private stall and then left the bathroom. But the Court disagreed, explaining the boy’s bathroom also has undivided urinals, and students change clothes in there.
In other words, ALL students’ privacy begins at the bathroom door.
☕️ CHEESY JABS ☙ Monday, January 2, 2023 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Huge 11th Circuit win for rational school bathroom policy; drama in the House; WSJ asks whether jabs fuel variants; SADS celebrity & medical deaths; Biden prioritized sandwiches over terrorists; more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
If you are born with a prostate, you are a male, regardless of how you want to dress and/or act.“sex … is an immutable characteristic determined solely by the accident of birth”
First, you’ll be encouraged that at least seven out of twelve judges on the Court found that Drew Adams is a biological girl, period. Her “gender identity” is completely different from whether under the law she is a girl or not. Boys bathrooms are for boys, not for girls who dress like boys:
Next, the Court cited the Frontiero case, in which the U.S. Supreme Court said that “sex … is an immutable characteristic determined solely by the accident of birth:”
In saying sex is immutable, they meant it cannot be changed. The majority seemed intrigued by the concept of “gender fluidity,” which seems to imply something more “mutable” than “immutable.” In saying that sex is determined SOLELY by birth, they meant you can’t change it next Wednesday based on how you are feeling at the moment, or for any other reason. The Court explained, “There is simply no alternative definition of ‘sex’ for transgender persons as compared to non transgender persons.”
The Court wrote that biological differences between the sexes was the fundamental reason for constitutional and Title IX protections, holding “To fail to acknowledge even our most basic biological differences . . . risks making the guarantee of equal protection superficial, and so disserving it.”
In what should be, but isn’t, entirely uncontroversial, the Court also recognized that non-trans kids have protectable privacy rights in the bathroom, explaining that “the protection of individual privacy will occasionally require some segregation between the sexes is beyond doubt.” The majority rejected the lower court’s argument that Drew didn’t violate anyone’s privacy because she just used a private stall and then left the bathroom. But the Court disagreed, explaining the boy’s bathroom also has undivided urinals, and students change clothes in there.
In other words, ALL students’ privacy begins at the bathroom door.
☕️ CHEESY JABS ☙ Monday, January 2, 2023 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Huge 11th Circuit win for rational school bathroom policy; drama in the House; WSJ asks whether jabs fuel variants; SADS celebrity & medical deaths; Biden prioritized sandwiches over terrorists; more.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
Let me say that just because something can be done it doesn't necessarily make it right.
Though out history and previous to the last 20 years or so plastic surgery to shape a decapitated penis into a home made Vagina did not exist . Plastic and chemically made Breasts were around for a while and some freaks installed them, but cutting the actual Johnson off and reshaping it from an exterior organ to an interior organ is a fairly new process.
Now just because the process exists does not mean it should be done, and the fact is that IF it is done it does not change the person's gender. It only mutilates the organ they were born with. It does not install a Uterus or a prostate a Birth canal or a set of balls.
The sick person that has this done and the butcher medical person who does this has only changed their appearance and not their gender.
Though out history and previous to the last 20 years or so plastic surgery to shape a decapitated penis into a home made Vagina did not exist . Plastic and chemically made Breasts were around for a while and some freaks installed them, but cutting the actual Johnson off and reshaping it from an exterior organ to an interior organ is a fairly new process.
Now just because the process exists does not mean it should be done, and the fact is that IF it is done it does not change the person's gender. It only mutilates the organ they were born with. It does not install a Uterus or a prostate a Birth canal or a set of balls.
The sick person that has this done and the butcher medical person who does this has only changed their appearance and not their gender.
'Giggle for Girls' CEO sued by biological male after being prevented from using female-only social media app
An Australian trans-identified male is suing a female-only social media platform for alleged discrimination after being barred from using the service in September 2021.
According to the Guardian, Roxanne Tickle, a male who identifies as a woman, filed the federal court lawsuit on December 22, claiming to have been unlawfully barred from using the Giggle for Girls social media app. A further complaint against Giggle CEO Sall Grover in the lawsuit is that she believes “transgender women, including the Applicant, to be male.”
The trans-identified male is seeking damages, complete access to the female-only online space, and a written apology from Grover.
“I believe that I am being discriminated against by being provided with extremely limited functionality of a smartphone app by the app provider compared to that of other users because I am a transgender woman,” Tickle stated in an earlier complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission filed in 2021.
If Roxanne Tickle wants to be taken seriously, she should have used another last name. Johnson perhaps?
Or go for broke and change it to Tess Tichol.