All you karma cryers...

cwo_ghwebb

No Use for Donk Twits
Now I know where the Liberals

have been cutting and pasting their karma giving posts from!

PSA from Vrai! Thank you!
 

sux2b44

I heart CLeValley
I agree. The information had to obtainable first by either public records or by the person whom they are posting about. Here is the def. from American Law dictionary regarding defamation. (I have taken several law courses, so I get use some of the space taken up by this in my head)

defamation
n. the act of making untrue statements about another which damages his/her reputation. If the defamatory statement is printed or broadcast over the media it is libel and, if only oral, it is slander. Public figures, including officeholders and candidates, have to show that the defamation was made with malicious intent and was not just fair comment. Damages for slander may be limited to actual (special) damages unless there is malice. Some statements such as an accusation of having committed a crime, having a feared disease or being unable to perform one's occupation are called libel per se or slander per se and can more easily lead to large money awards in court and even punitive damage recovery by the person harmed. Most states provide for a demand for a printed retraction of defamation and only allow a lawsuit if there is no such admission of error.
 
Last edited:

cwo_ghwebb

No Use for Donk Twits
Cool! Thanks for the definition. Can posts here be used as evidence of defamation if it can be proven the incident never happened?


:lmao:



I think it was something about me and sheep.


I lost my job and can't get my old job back as a shepherd.
 
Top