Pelosi's comments to reporter Jim Rosen about her being Catholic and therefore he was wrong to ask a question about her hating Trump will backfire down the road (as will her comments about prayerfully considering impeachment).
Wrt Rosen, one could (in this environment of reflexive victimhood) claim Pelosi was being anti-Semitic (Rosen being Jewish). But more importantly, how does Pelosi get away with claiming religious things that her side of the aisle has been so energized in trying to get rid of in "public life"? All she did was undercut her side - in general.
Specifically, though, this will come back to bite the Dems if/when Amy Barrett comes up for a spot on SCOTUS. Remember Feinstein's comment that Barrett's Catholic dogma ran deep and as such disqualified her from being confirmed for the position she now holds? Aside from the fact that there is a specific prohibition against this line of questioning Pelosi's "Catholic" remarks (other than being factually false - she is no Catholic in anything other than appellation) undercuts any objection the Dems might want to play wrt Barrett's supposed Catholic, pro-life outlook on her judicial work.
Can't have it both ways, Nan/Dems. Your rules.
As far as impeachment goes, buy stock in popcorn. This should be interesting.
--- End of line (MCP)
