Boogerman said:
I agree that you shouldn't be dishonorably discharged, but I think there should be some form of punishment for soliciting sex. The military is all about appearances, and nothing about hiring a hooker is classy, or honorable. It cheapens the people who participate in it, would you want someone defending you who is so hung up on sex he has to buy it? Service members are supposed to be representatives of our country, and that's not how a lot of people want to be represented. JMO....itsbob said:THAT is ridiculous.. I'd laugh if it wasn't so incredibly stupid for someone in the governemnt to even suggest it..
But then again, in the Army any sex act other then "missionary" is illegal.. adultery is illegal, to include pre-marital sex.. you can get into trouble (the way the rules are written) for with your SPOUSE!!
itsbob said:THAT is ridiculous.. I'd laugh if it wasn't so incredibly stupid for someone in the governemnt to even suggest it..
But then again, in the Army any sex act other then "missionary" is illegal.. adultery is illegal, to include pre-marital sex.. you can get into trouble (the way the rules are written) for with your SPOUSE!!
Yeah, I've never understood why guys pay directly for sex when there are so many willing participants who are into the payment plan. :shrug:Nickel said:I agree that you shouldn't be dishonorably discharged, but I think there should be some form of punishment for soliciting sex. The military is all about appearances, and nothing about hiring a hooker is classy, or honorable. It cheapens the people who participate in it, would you want someone defending you who is so hung up on sex he has to buy it? Service members are supposed to be representatives of our country, and that's not how a lot of people want to be represented. JMO....
Why do you think mental cheating is any better than physical cheating?Boogerman said:I wonder if a punishment for having cybersex with someone other than your spouse is being worked on in the books. I actually wouldn't be surprised if it is being worked on.
justhangn said:Why do you think mental cheating is any better than physical cheating?
You made the statement of "cybersex", that implies a written dialog between two people.Boogerman said:as long as it's not written down in a chat session or a diary... there's no proof. That is until someone invents a machine that reads people's thoughts
Nickel said:I agree that you shouldn't be dishonorably discharged, but I think there should be some form of punishment for soliciting sex. The military is all about appearances, and nothing about hiring a hooker is classy, or honorable. It cheapens the people who participate in it, would you want someone defending you who is so hung up on sex he has to buy it? Service members are supposed to be representatives of our country, and that's not how a lot of people want to be represented. JMO....
What is they use a Platinum Visa to pay? Thats classy.Nickel said:The military is all about appearances, and nothing about hiring a hooker is classy, or honorable.
Nickel said:I agree that you shouldn't be dishonorably discharged, but I think there should be some form of punishment for soliciting sex. The military is all about appearances, and nothing about hiring a hooker is classy, or honorable. It cheapens the people who participate in it, would you want someone defending you who is so hung up on sex he has to buy it? Service members are supposed to be representatives of our country, and that's not how a lot of people want to be represented. JMO....
Christy said:Personally, I think the hiring of hookers for any service member who wants it should be part of the benefits package. It's the least we can do. :shrug:
You're kidding, right? "It's KP for you, soldier! The woman-on-top position makes you less of a man!" (I think that's BS, by the way.) Can you imagine if the soldier's bunkmates found out that the guy and his wife did it canine-style? "Hey, Private! Woof woof woof!"itsbob said:But then again, in the Army any sex act other then "missionary" is illegal