The order has
drawn fire, especially from
conservatives, as an attempt to intimidate or silence parents who express their views to local school boards.
Clarke said her division at the Justice Department, the Civil Rights Division, doesn’t deal with the issue, but that she is aware of Garland’s order.
“I’m aware of the memorandum from the attorney general, which speaks to threats and intimidation that some school officials have experienced in our country. That’s not activity protected by the First Amendment,” Clarke said.
Blackburn followed by asking: “So you are saying that a parent going to a school board and expressing their dismay with CRT [critical race theory] or with a mask mandate is not protected speech?”
Clarke: “I believe the attorney general’s memorandum deals with threats and intimidation and harassment.”
Blackburn: “Did DOJ issue the directive to the FBI to target parents in direct response to this letter from the teachers union? Yes or no?”
Blackburn apparently was referring to a
Sept. 29 letter to President Joe Biden from the National School Boards Association urging him to use federal laws to combat terrorism as tools against outspoken parents at school board meetings.
“Again, this is not a matter that the division handled,” Clarke replied, referring to the Civil Rights Division she heads. “But, what I can tell you is that the attorney general said threats against public servants are not only illegal, they run counter to our nation’s core values.”
“I believe the attorney general’s memorandum deals with threats and intimidation and harassment,” Kristen Clarke says.
www.dailysignal.com