Biden is a GLOBAL Embarrassment
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
Chopticon64
Well-Known Member
Top economy says what?
Weeks ago I posted stories of how media wants trump, you keep posting pro trump media.
All media wants trump to win
Weeks ago I posted stories of how media wants trump, you keep posting pro trump media.
All media wants trump to win
Smell the Desperation ......
Why Would Left Wing Media want Trump ?
Oh Right you are claiming the Media is Supporting Trump for the MONEY ..... that is Pure COPIUM .... and your Only Reasoning for the reports on Biden's Decline.
Yes CNN Is Circling the Drain.
NO Liberal Media is NOT In the Tank for Trump, the simple matter is YOU CANNOT COVER UP BIDEN'S COGNITIVE DECLINE AN
Last edited:
CPUSA
Well-Known Member
IT'S ALL A COMPLETE LIE!!!
DON'T BELIEVE IT FOR A MINUTE!!!
BRING BACK PRESIDENT TRUMP FOR A REAL TOP ECONOMY....AGAIN!!!!
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
Do people have no pride, no self-respect? This woman, Stephanie Wolkoff either has no self-respect or is a lunatic herself.
People watched this debacle. It wasn't a behind the door meeting it was on television before millions of people and this moron expects us to believe that Joe Biden was made to look bad by CNN? The only way CNN could have made Joe Biden look good was to turn the light off completely and have him there in the dark. Look at the man's face when he wasn't speaking. He had no idea where in the hell he was.
People watched this debacle. It wasn't a behind the door meeting it was on television before millions of people and this moron expects us to believe that Joe Biden was made to look bad by CNN? The only way CNN could have made Joe Biden look good was to turn the light off completely and have him there in the dark. Look at the man's face when he wasn't speaking. He had no idea where in the hell he was.
SamSpade
Well-Known Member
Predictions - one has pretty much already come true -
1. He's gonna stay in the race. To my knowledge, the 25th Amendment can be dismissed if the President contests it. And his family has way too much to lose - much less suffer disgrace historically - for him to just leave at this point. You don't bounce back from leaving a race because you're mentally incompetent to proceed.
2. The Dems will 100% deny they EVER wanted him out. Yep. They'll say it was ALL MADE UP by Republicans. Joe was always their guy.
And he just had a bad night. You'll see.
1. He's gonna stay in the race. To my knowledge, the 25th Amendment can be dismissed if the President contests it. And his family has way too much to lose - much less suffer disgrace historically - for him to just leave at this point. You don't bounce back from leaving a race because you're mentally incompetent to proceed.
2. The Dems will 100% deny they EVER wanted him out. Yep. They'll say it was ALL MADE UP by Republicans. Joe was always their guy.
And he just had a bad night. You'll see.
Tech
Well-Known Member
Yep, if he contests it, it then goes to congress. That requires two thirds affirmation by both houses to keep the VP as acting president.
Yep, pretty much so, but you left out one step, that being should the President deny an inability exits the VP and majority of the cabinet have 4 days to again deem that the President is unable to serve and again notify the President pro-tempore and Speaker of the House that an inability does exist.
Thinking about this some, doesn't it sound like an insurrection?
SamSpade
Well-Known Member
It does seem to be that removing a President via 25th Amendment is a LOT harder than is suggested in movies (e.g. "Air Force One", where it is implied it just requires the cabinet and a sign-off from the VP) or in the press.
It also seems to be true that it can only happen if it's extremely well supported across the board or at least, agreed upon by the President himself.
SamSpade
Well-Known Member
A coup, a mutiny, treason.
I'm just astonished there are SO MANY roadblocks to removing someone, it seems that an actual tyrant could circumvent it indefinitely.
Actually, it isn't a removal as that can only be via impeachment. The 25th, if employed, only makes the VP the acting President.
Tech
Well-Known Member
I was trying to keep it simple. Insurrection? No, since it is following the law. Coup? Maybe, but it doesn't remove the president from office, just they don't obey him. You know Tuesday.
Tech
Well-Known Member
AF 1 would be the perfect case, the President is not in control and the situation would be over before congress could act, another would be after Reagan was shot if he didn't regain conciseness soon enough.
TPD
the poor dad
Oh like the dems tried to make us believe Trump was - a tyrant who was never going to leave office.
European Officials Have Noticed Deterioration of the President’s Faculties For Months
Biden's deterioration didn't just emerge on Thursday night. It's been covered up for a long time, thanks to a complicit staff around him and the desire of Democrats to retain power. European leaders are shocked.
The Wall Street Journal published a piece on what European leaders have witnessed during summits and meetings, like the G7 conferences, and Biden isn't doing well. The debate last week confirmed their suspicions.
Biden skipped the peace summit for Ukraine in Switzerland at the end of the G7. Instead, he flew to Los Angeles to attend a star-studded fundraiser.
During an EU-US summit last October in Washington, officials said Biden's performance and focus fluctuated between meetings, sometimes during a meeting. European senior officials said he "stumbled over his talking points at several moments, requiring Secretary of State Antony Blinken to intervene and point out the lines he should use."
Yikes. Blinken had to manage Biden's talking points during meetings.
TPD
the poor dad
Biden's staff has got to be breathing a sigh of relief now, knowing that the world knows the gig is over and they know longer have to hide it. I'm sure it's been like watching a toddler - trying to anticipate the next move and doing everything to prevent disaster and destruction, along with keeping that toddler from opening their mouth a blabbing about stuff they know nothing about.
Yeah, I dumped insurrection as a thought when I reread the 25th and it isn't a removal.
Yep, in both those instances the President had an inability to perform his duty and neither would fall under Section 3 is when, like they are hoping, Ol' Joe does it himself, if he can even recognize what is going on.
The nature of section 4 of 25th is when the VP makes the declaration that a lack of ability exists and 1/2+1 of the cabinet heads agree. I could see that being a big jump for them if the President immediately says he is able and follows up with some "your fired" notes.
Tech
Well-Known Member
[QUOTE="Ken King, post: 6586666, member:
The nature of section 4 of 25th is when the VP makes the declaration that a lack of ability exists and 1/2+1 of the cabinet heads agree. I could see that being a big jump for them if the President immediately says he is able and follows up with some "your fired" notes.
[/QUOTE]
Keeping with the you're fired, could the acting president do any firing?
The nature of section 4 of 25th is when the VP makes the declaration that a lack of ability exists and 1/2+1 of the cabinet heads agree. I could see that being a big jump for them if the President immediately says he is able and follows up with some "your fired" notes.
[/QUOTE]
Keeping with the you're fired, could the acting president do any firing?