Biden's clearance was revoked

WingsOfGold

Well-Known Member
Ok. So not the price of eggs or things that impacted any of us.

Great win, 7,000 women’s sports and there were 20 trans women, and the only reason they got notoriety is because they excelled. They always had separate bathrooms
Couldn't care less about eggs, bacon another matter. 🖕They aren't meat yet!
 

WingsOfGold

Well-Known Member
Why does Trump want the role if there is no influence?

Biden was the king of delegating, but you folks said the president needs to be involved with everything.

I think Trump will be a good Chairman of the Kennedy center, but I’d think he’s pretty busy, and the Kennedy center isn’t some off broadway theater, it’s one of the busiest theaters on the east coast.
Lololol Dementia Joe is a total retard you idiot. Been for years, why do you think he would never engage the press?
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
Lololol Dementia Joe is a total retard you idiot. Been for years, why do you think he would never engage the press?
In all fairness to Joe, it could be a complete coincidence that the press conferences just happened to coincide with an urgent need to have his Depends changed.
 

Ramp Guy

Well-Known Member
Ok. So not the price of eggs or things that impacted any of us.

Great win, 7,000 women’s sports and there were 20 trans women, and the only reason they got notoriety is because they excelled. They always had separate bathrooms
You are clueless........

Lia Thomas exposed 'male genitalia' in women's locker room at swim meet, ex-swimmer says​


"We did not give our consent, they did not ask for our consent, but in that locker room, we turn around and there's a 6'4" biological man dropping his pants and watching us undress, and we're exposed to male genitalia," Gaines said.


Ex-swimmer demands transgender locker rooms after Lia Thomas allegedly exposed ‘male genitalia’​



Trans student exposed girls to male genitalia in school locker room, legal group claims​





Transgender woman arrested accused of sexually assaulting teen in Walmart bathroom​



Trans student exposed girls to male genitalia in school locker room ...

 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
IMG_2045.jpeg
 

WingsOfGold

Well-Known Member
You are clueless........

Lia Thomas exposed 'male genitalia' in women's locker room at swim meet, ex-swimmer says​


"We did not give our consent, they did not ask for our consent, but in that locker room, we turn around and there's a 6'4" biological man dropping his pants and watching us undress, and we're exposed to male genitalia," Gaines said.


Ex-swimmer demands transgender locker rooms after Lia Thomas allegedly exposed ‘male genitalia’​



Trans student exposed girls to male genitalia in school locker room, legal group claims​





Transgender woman arrested accused of sexually assaulting teen in Walmart bathroom​



Trans student exposed girls to male genitalia in school locker room ...

Minor detail, they didn't take a dump together according to the imbecile.
 

Bann

Doris Day meets Lady Gaga
PREMO Member
Ok. So not the price of eggs or things that impacted any of us.

Great win, 7,000 women’s sports and there were 20 trans women, and the only reason they got notoriety is because they excelled. They always had separate bathrooms
When the birds get over their Avian Flu - the price of eggs will come down. BOOM. Daddy DJT solved another problem.

:rolleyes:
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
I’m really curious as to why they have to be stripped.

As far as I know when a contractor leaves a job, if the clearance is not picked up and sponsored by another company, it expires.

So if they left the government at the end of Joe’s term, and didn’t get a job somewhere immediately that required a clearance, it should’ve expired.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
I’m really curious as to why they have to be stripped.

As far as I know when a contractor leaves a job, if the clearance is not picked up and sponsored by another company, it expires.

So if they left the government at the end of Joe’s term, and didn’t get a job somewhere immediately that required a clearance, it should’ve expired.

According to my very well informed source (full disclosure, I sleep with her) a clearance can remain active in the system for up to to two years, just waiting for a new org to "claim it". Been changes recently but that's not been done away with.
 

BOP

Well-Known Member
This is disgusting in so many ways!! I always thought it was Jill. this is so much worse!!!
I suspected as much a while back when I heard that Hunter was attending high-level meetings without a security clearance. And of course the Demonicrats poo-pooed it 6 ways to Sunday, and the complicit, compliant collective Pravda swept it under the rugs with cries of "But Trump!"
 

WingsOfGold

Well-Known Member
I suspected as much a while back when I heard that Hunter was attending high-level meetings without a security clearance. And of course the Demonicrats poo-pooed it 6 ways to Sunday, and the complicit, compliant collective Pravda swept it under the rugs with cries of "But Trump!"
A little revenge, FBI raids crackhead humble abode 0600 looking for classified material and illegal firearms.
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
According to my very well informed source (full disclosure, I sleep with her) a clearance can remain active in the system for up to to two years, just waiting for a new org to "claim it". Been changes recently but that's not been done away with.
That should be changed immediately.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
That should be changed immediately.

Generally isn't a problem, since a clearance without need to know and access isn't much good for espionage. And the ponderous process for getting a new clearance is insane. You either wouldn't hire that person, or you need to hire them and literally pay them nothing for six months to a year while you wait if they are unique and the only one you really need.

The real question is why did Leticia have one at all. For prosecuting Trump? Cant imagine what classified she would have needed to prosecute that case.
 

LightRoasted

If I may ...
For your consideration ...


Someone help us out and explain somethings. It is my understanding that just having a security clearance, does not permit access to information via computers, (which would require a different type of authorization). But that one can be in certain classified areas such as where classified materials or equipment are, or say a meeting, where classified information can be seen, read in paper form, or shared verbally? And doesn't "being read in" to whatever classified discussion include this as well?

Also, that having, say, a Top Secret clearance, only applies to the organization that a person is employed, or work product being worked on? And doesn't apply to driving over from, say an Army munitions research lab, to a research hanger working on the F35 at PAX, to check out the advancements over there?

Is this correct?
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Also, that having, say, a Top Secret clearance, only applies to the organization that a person is employed, or work product being worked on? And doesn't apply to driving over from, say an Army munitions research lab, to a research hanger working on the F35 at PAX, to check out the advancements over there?


I would say that depends on the level of the person Sec Hegseth has access to EVERYTHING Private Snuffy Crewing a M1 Abrams or Airman Jones working on an A-10 not so much
 

DaSDGuy

Well-Known Member
For your consideration ...


Someone help us out and explain somethings. It is my understanding that just having a security clearance, does not permit access to information via computers, (which would require a different type of authorization). But that one can be in certain classified areas such as where classified materials or equipment are, or say a meeting, where classified information can be seen, read in paper form, or shared verbally? And doesn't "being read in" to whatever classified discussion include this as well?

Also, that having, say, a Top Secret clearance, only applies to the organization that a person is employed, or work product being worked on? And doesn't apply to driving over from, say an Army munitions research lab, to a research hanger working on the F35 at PAX, to check out the advancements over there?

Is this correct?
It always falls back on their need to know. That engineer could be involved in researching munitions that will hang on that F35.
 
Top