Big improvements.

[VoteJP]

Blog-o-sphere

Okay, lets hear some more of you ideas, you should have a list of them now, and not just make them up as you go along.

Another interesting idea would be to change the Maryland Lottery so that instead of one BIG winner we change it so that many people win in every game.

Like a hundred million dollar ($100,000,000.) jackpot could have ten (10) sets of winning numbers so each set would be eligible to win ten million ($10,000,000.) each, and so it is like ten separate games in-one every week.

It just makes so there would be many more big winners.

 

[bcp]

Another interesting idea would be to change the Maryland Lottery so that instead of one BIG winner we change it so that many people win in every game.

Like a hundred million dollar ($100,000,000.) jackpot could have ten (10) sets of winning numbers so each set would be eligible to win ten million ($10,000,000.) each, and so it is like ten separate games in-one every week.

It just makes so there would be many more big winners.

They already do that.
if more than one picks the number, then the money is split.

 

[VoteJP]

Blog-o-sphere

They already do that.
if more than one picks the number, then the money is split.

Well duh!!!!


I though it was clear but I am referring to the State splitting the Jackpot before anyone wins it, and not the winners slitting the loot after winning the jackpot when there is more than one winner.

 

[bcp]

Well duh!!!!


I though it was clear but I am referring to the State splitting the Jackpot before anyone wins it, and not the winners slitting the loot after winning the jackpot when there is more than one winner.

so are you saying more than one drawing per night?

Im not following exactly.

 

[VoteJP]

Blog-o-sphere

so are you saying more than one drawing per night?

Im not following exactly.

Okay, I had not figured out the mechanics of it.


So yes that sounds right - maybe at least 10 or even 20 drawings per game night which I believe is twice (2 nights) per week.

If the jackpot were $200,000,000. then have 20 drawings with $10,000,000. for each drawing and spread the money around to many more winners every time.

And even if the jackpot were lower like 10,000,000 then do ten (10) drawings with at least ten winners of 1,000,000 each.

That would make the lottery more pro-player, IMO.

 

[This_person]

Okay, I had not figured out the mechanics of it.


So yes that sounds right - maybe at least 10 or even 20 drawings per game night which I believe is twice (2 nights) per week.

If the jackpot were $200,000,000. then have 20 drawings with $10,000,000. for each drawing and spread the money around to many more winners every time.

And even if the jackpot were lower like 10,000,000 then do ten (10) drawings with at least ten winners of 1,000,000 each.

That would make the lottery more pro-player, IMO.

They could always divide it up by the number of people playing, and give everybody their money back. Then they'd ALL be "winners".

 

[VoteJP]

Blog-o-sphere

They could always divide it up by the number of people playing, and give everybody their money back. Then they'd ALL be "winners".

That is really funny.


Well done T_p.


And I must submit that I never did like the idea of the State having and profiting from a lottery.

Some aspects of Socialism does have merit, but the Lottery is the worst aspect of Socialism in the State having control of an industry that feeds off of the population while providing nothing of value in return.

So T_p is so funny because of that ironic truth in his comment.

 

[This_person]

That is really funny.


Well done T_p.


And I must submit that I never did like the idea of the State having and profiting from a lottery.

Some aspects of Socialism does have merit, but the Lottery is the worst aspect of Socialism in the State having control of an industry that feeds off of the population while providing nothing of value in return.

So T_p is so funny because of that ironic truth in his comment.

At the risk of engaging you directly in conversation.........

The lottery is actually the only fair tax - it taxes people based on their willingness to give up their money voluntarily. It may be a tax against stupidity, but there's no law against stupidity, so it's okay.

 

[VoteJP]

Blog-o-sphere

The lottery is actually the only fair tax - it taxes people based on their willingness to give up their money voluntarily. It may be a tax against stupidity, but there's no law against stupidity, so it's okay.

That might be okay for some, but I object to the State feeding off of the stupidity of the population.

It is different when there is a Gambling Casino ripping off the public - then the State will tax the winners and tax the Casino, and then the State can intervene when the Casino goes too far or to give some rehab or welfare to the families that lose to the gambling.

This goes back to the ignorance of child support where it is the State that promotes divorce and empowers adultery and breaks up families, instead of helping the population to improve.

 

[kwillia]

Happy Mental Illness Week... have you hugged a delusional today...

 

[MMDad]

Wirelessly posted (Change we can believe in!: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.7) 320x240; VZW; Motorola-Q9c; Windows Mobile 6.0 Standard)

Happy Mental Illness Week... have you hugged a delusional today...

(((((Kwillia))))) Yes, I have.

 

[VoteJP]

Blog-o-sphere

Happy Mental Illness Week... have you hugged a delusional today...

I would hug one if one would let me.

 

[MMDad]

I would hug one if one would let me.

Not even your fellow inmates will have you? Priceless!

 

[Bay_Kat]

I would hug one if one would let me.

Perv

 

[VoteJP]

Blog-o-sphere

Change the Maryland Lottery so that instead of one BIG winner we change it so that many people win in every game.

Like a hundred million dollar ($100,000,000.) jackpot could have ten (10) sets of winning numbers so each set would be eligible to win ten million ($10,000,000.) each, and so it is like ten separate games in-one every week.

It just makes so there would be many more big winners.

Maybe have at least 10 or even 20 drawings per game night which I believe is twice (2 nights) per week.

If the jackpot were $200,000,000. then have 20 drawings with $10,000,000. for each drawing and spread the money around to many more winners every time.

And even if the jackpot were lower like 10,000,000 then do ten (10) drawings with at least ten winners of 1,000,000 each.

That would make the lottery more pro-player, IMO.

 

[Bay_Kat]

Change the Maryland Lottery so that instead of one BIG winner we change it so that many people win in every game.

Like a hundred million dollar ($100,000,000.) jackpot could have ten (10) sets of winning numbers so each set would be eligible to win ten million ($10,000,000.) each, and so it is like ten separate games in-one every week.

It just makes so there would be many more big winners.

Maybe have at least 10 or even 20 drawings per game night which I believe is twice (2 nights) per week.

If the jackpot were $200,000,000. then have 20 drawings with $10,000,000. for each drawing and spread the money around to many more winners every time.

And even if the jackpot were lower like 10,000,000 then do ten (10) drawings with at least ten winners of 1,000,000 each.

That would make the lottery more pro-player, IMO.

Must be the Alzheimers, but I think you already said that and it's just as stupid this time.

 

[VoteJP]

Blog-o-sphere

Must be the Alzheimers, but I think you already said that and it's just as stupid this time.

I am beginning to see that calling-names and criticizing might be your one dominant characteristic.

So are you related to T_p?

 

[kwillia]

Pssst... Casinos and the govts that run the lottery don't want more payouts. That defeats the whole purpose.

When you become governor, you will have to change your way of thinking so that you could afford to pay for all the children that aren't going to be getting child support from their deadbeat parents because of your new laws letting them off the hook.

 

[This_person]

I am beginning to see that calling-names and criticizing might be your one dominant characteristic.

So are you related to T_p?

I call you names? Huh, didn't realize. Sorry if I did. Not sorry if they were accurate.

Criticizing, I do that a lot to you. It's sad you ask for it, and then can't take honest criticism.

 

[VoteJP]

Blog-o-sphere

Pssst... Casinos and the govts that run the lottery don't want more payouts. That defeats the whole purpose.

When you become governor, you will have to change your way of thinking ...

I am not going there as a subordinate - no, I am going as Governor to take command and "defeat" their purposes.

It is my intention to change their way of thinking and not my own.

I am not campaigning nor running as a sheep but as the new leader.