Black Lives Matter Pens Letter To Joe Biden And Kamala Harris: ‘We Want Something For Our Vote’

WingsOfGold

Well-Known Member
We have Affirmative Action, Integration, and have spent a sh1t ton of money trying to improve the status of blacks and bring them up to a standard where they no longer need help to attain the America Dream.

Many have attained that dream. Many have not.

There will always be the have nots of every race.
It is the have not's screaming for a free dream, but he dream is not free. It requires hard work and study.
I do not know how we can get the dream for the have nots when all we have already done has never achieved it.
Hell, lets add this bunch of ugly bastards as well. Coloreds invented water, ask em.

 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
What are white people superior at?


Being fathers?---------------I mean real fathers, not just sperm fathers.
 

RoseRed

American Beauty
PREMO Member

luvmygdaughters

Well-Known Member
I guess they should've voted for Trump. He did more for the black communities as far as creating jobs go. Or...is it...they dont want to work for it...they want it given to them.
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
I guess they should've voted for Trump. He did more for the black communities as far as creating jobs go. Or...is it...they dont want to work for it...they want it given to them.
153219
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
It's tough fighting a race that denigrates it's own people who rise above the group.
I guess they should've voted for Trump. He did more for the black communities as far as creating jobs go. Or...is it...they dont want to work for it...they want it given to them.

Like every race there are at least two classes. Those that work hard to get ahead and those that think the world owes them a living.
Trump got a lot of black votes this time, Unfortunately not enough, but some of them did wake up. But the democrats still get the majority of their votes because them thinking they are helping them, when in actuality they are merely using them.
 

glhs837

Power with Control

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
So skin color is a job qualifier and we've been lied to all these years?

Well sir: Look around.
Skin color has been a job qualifier and promotion qualifier for many years.
Ever since Affirmative Action and Quota's came into being.
It's certainly nothing new.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
Well sir: Look around.
Skin color has been a job qualifier and promotion qualifier for many years.
Ever since Affirmative Action and Quota's came into being.
It's certainly nothing new.

I suppose the new piece is "requirement" rather than qualifier.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
BLM Founders Demand Joe Biden Support A ‘Roadmap’ To Abolition Of Police, Prisons



But, Fox News reports that BLM’s founders, including self-identified Marxist Patrisse Cullors, and their “Squad” allies in Congress — notably Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) — are pressing for the BREATHE Act to pass Congress and receive a rubber stamp from any Biden White House.

“Black Lives Matter activists are pressuring Democrats to embrace the BREATHE Act, which includes a section requiring a ‘roadmap for prison abolition.'” the outlet reports Sunday.

“Cullors, who has written a letter to President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris requesting a meeting, told The Hollywood Reporter she is requesting that the new administration work to pass the BREATHE Act within the first 100 days,” Fox notes.


Although the report only notes a “summary” of the BREATHE Act’s, the Act’s campaign website notes that it includes a full divestment of “federal resources” from law enforcement — defunding the police and immigration enforcement on a federal level — and ending incarceration, a priority that also includes the “full decarceration of federal detention facilities within 10 years and enacts a moratorium on all new federal prison, jail, immigrant and youth detention construction.”
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
Everyone must realize that this is central to some of the problem with the way we elect our leaders - when any group ESPECIALLY well-heeled donors contribute to the election of an individual - it's impossible and ridiculous to believe that they don't want anything in return.

We have seen over years where donors with deep pockets have switched or withheld funds from someone who didn't give them what they wanted - or who DID do what they wanted and were rewarded for it. It stands to reason that they effectively OWN them. You have a bloc of voters or piles of money chasing a person whose continued employment depends on keeping them happy.

Is it any wonder that they do exactly that?

But it doesn't work quite as well if the individual in question is only in office for a short time.

If we combine term limits with strict campaign controls - we could put a dent in the whole pay for play thing.
 

Kinnakeet

Well-Known Member
We have Affirmative Action, Integration, and have spent a sh1t ton of money trying to improve the status of blacks and bring them up to a standard where they no longer need help to attain the America Dream.

Many have attained that dream. Many have not.

There will always be the have nots of every race.
It is the have not's screaming for a free dream, but he dream is not free. It requires hard work and study.
I do not know how we can get the dream for the have nots when all we have already done has never achieved it.
We have Affirmative Action, Integration, and have spent a sh1t ton of money trying to improve the status of blacks and bring them up to a standard where they no longer need help to attain the America Dream.
Just like the rich guys trying to make gentlemen out of the Three Stooges
 

Kinnakeet

Well-Known Member
Everyone must realize that this is central to some of the problem with the way we elect our leaders - when any group ESPECIALLY well-heeled donors contribute to the election of an individual - it's impossible and ridiculous to believe that they don't want anything in return.

We have seen over years where donors with deep pockets have switched or withheld funds from someone who didn't give them what they wanted - or who DID do what they wanted and were rewarded for it. It stands to reason that they effectively OWN them. You have a bloc of voters or piles of money chasing a person whose continued employment depends on keeping them happy.

Is it any wonder that they do exactly that?

But it doesn't work quite as well if the individual in question is only in office for a short time.

If we combine term limits with strict campaign controls - we could put a dent in the whole pay for play thing.
Like sleepy Joe and china they have him in their front pocket
 
Top