A black writer for The New York Times, apparently incensed that other blacks might not support the move toward reparations for American slavery, ripped the black witnesses testifying against reparations, tweeting that the witnesses “have no apparent qualifications other than being black.”
As The College Fix notes, New York Times writer Jamelle Bouie, formerly chief political correspondent for Slate Magazine, was infuriated by the idea of former NFL player Burgess Owens and Columbia University philosophy major Coleman Hughes testifying, writing on Twitter:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/48629/black-nyt-writer-mocks-blacks-testifying-against-hank-berrien
As The College Fix notes, New York Times writer Jamelle Bouie, formerly chief political correspondent for Slate Magazine, was infuriated by the idea of former NFL player Burgess Owens and Columbia University philosophy major Coleman Hughes testifying, writing on Twitter:
so will the republican members of the subcommittee on the constitution, civil rights, and civil liberties have anyone serious speaking against reparations or will they just invite candace owens again to do her thing? according to @emarvelous it looks like they’ll have this guy who wrote an op-ed and a college sophomore up against [checks notes] economists, experts, a US senator, and Ta-Nehisi Coates, who brought this all into the mainstream. it is indicative of the fundamental contempt republicans have for this conversation that their speakers have no apparent qualifications other than being black.
so will the republican members of the subcommittee on the constitution, civil rights, and civil liberties have anyone serious speaking against reparations or will they just invite candace owens again to do her thing?
— b-boy bouiebaisse (@jbouie) June 19, 2019
https://www.dailywire.com/news/48629/black-nyt-writer-mocks-blacks-testifying-against-hank-berrien