I don't think I will be a believer in technological truth detectors anytime some.
Pushers of such technology conveniently forget to mention that considerable subjective interpretation is need before any results can be produced. And over time the technology tends to move from an investigative aid to become the investigation itself.
Just look at the polygraph. Despite lack of support from any accredited scientific institution, its become a primary investigative aid in many law enforcement agencies and is used as a prerequisite for employment in many federal agencies. The result being thousands of people deigned employment and the expenditure of millions of dollars for multi year investigations based on nothing more then a blip on a chart.
The only real success current lie detector tests have had is scaring people into confessing.
Until/Unless this "brain fingerprinting" can show repeatable and verifiable results by independent accredited scientific institutions, I won't think any more of it then I do the polygraph.