Buzzfeeed is fake news....

TCROW

Well-Known Member
Well that tends to happen when a known liar writes stories. We generally call them "fiction authors".

Maybe this chap will add to his already impressive C.V. that's he's been fired from "Buzzfeed" as well as Salon.
 

Bird Dog

Bird Dog
PREMO Member
Well that tends to happen when a known liar writes stories. We generally call them "fiction authors".

Maybe this chap will add to his already impressive C.V. that's he's been fired from "Buzzfeed" as well as Salon.

His next job will be WAPO or NYT......he has street cred now........
 

TCROW

Well-Known Member
The truth should always be told, at any and all costs. Depending on what side one falls, you’ll either be disappointed or gleeful given this new wrinkle. However, if you’re not interested in the Truth, you probably don’t deserve a spot a the table.

But word is Mueller is getting closer and closer to wrapping up his work. If something like this were true, he’d be right to be pissed off. Why? Because if this were true (and we now know it is not), the Demonrat Party would draft Articles of Impeachment in the House. This would completely undercut Mueller’s work, as the House would have “gotten him” first. Legally I’m not sure how that would work out.

But-I’m wondering if this was an engineered leak to ferret out some loose lips or test some loyalty. It certainly smells like it.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
The truth should always be told, at any and all costs. Depending on what side one falls, you’ll either be disappointed or gleeful given this new wrinkle. However, if you’re not interested in the Truth, you probably don’t deserve a spot a the table.

But word is Mueller is getting closer and closer to wrapping up his work. If something like this were true, he’d be right to be pissed off. Why? Because if this were true (and we now know it is not), the Demonrat Party would draft Articles of Impeachment in the House. This would completely undercut Mueller’s work, as the House would have “gotten him” first. Legally I’m not sure how that would work out.

But-I’m wondering if this was an engineered leak to ferret out some loose lips or test some loyalty. It certainly smells like it.

Well it sure smells.
 

TCROW

Well-Known Member
Of course Mueller could be putting the pow-pow on this specifically because he doesn’t want House Demonrats to jump the gun. This clearly takes the wind out of their sails.
 

Bird Dog

Bird Dog
PREMO Member
Of course Mueller could be putting the pow-pow on this specifically because he doesn’t want House Demonrats to jump the gun. This clearly takes the wind out of their sails.

Wishful thinking......the Dems are all puking in their toilets this morning. Like a bunch of drunks.
 

transporter

Well-Known Member
So...none of you read the actual statement from the Special Counsel's office???

“BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the Special Counsel’s Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s Congressional testimony are not accurate,”

That's all it said.

The statement is very vague. It most certainly does not say the basic premise of the article, that Trump told Cohen to lie is false...doesn't say it's true either. They don't state which "specific statements" or which "characterizations of documents" are inaccurate. It does muddy the waters and call the report into question...but it also doesn't "debunk all".

Bird Dog's OP is definitely "not accurate"...
 

Bird Dog

Bird Dog
PREMO Member
So...none of you read the actual statement from the Special Counsel's office???



That's all it said.

The statement is very vague. It most certainly does not say the basic premise of the article, that Trump told Cohen to lie is false...doesn't say it's true either. They don't state which "specific statements" or which "characterizations of documents" are inaccurate. It does muddy the waters and call the report into question...but it also doesn't "debunk all".

Bird Dog's OP is definitely "not accurate"...

You’ve obviously not read any news articles this morning.......read a few and get back to me.
 

BOP

Well-Known Member
So...none of you read the actual statement from the Special Counsel's office???



That's all it said.

The statement is very vague. It most certainly does not say the basic premise of the article, that Trump told Cohen to lie is false...doesn't say it's true either. They don't state which "specific statements" or which "characterizations of documents" are inaccurate. It does muddy the waters and call the report into question...but it also doesn't "debunk all".

Bird Dog's OP is definitely "not accurate"...

You're drunk. What did you expect them to say? "Michael Cohen is a lying liar who lied out of his lying liar hole"?
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Poor little sappypuss....I heard his head explode all the way over here.

Stupidus won't know a thing about it unless he reads it on here. And then they'll zap his memory and he'll start yet another thread crowing that Cohen says Trump told him to lie.

On another note...Buzzfeed? Seriously? The "who'd you rather" and "we can guess what dog you are" website? Is there a reason why they are considered a news source?
 

TCROW

Well-Known Member
'Bout time, dontcha think?

Not really sweating it either way, the entertainment value is great. It will likely be a nothing burger, and much ado will be made about unpaid lemonade stand tax from 65 years ago.
 
Top