California Man Charged with Murder in Fentanyl Overdose

Editor

somd.com Editor
Staff member
PREMO Member
Patron
Andrew Duncanson, 25. Booking photo.

By Guy Leonard, The County Times

A St. Mary's County Grand Jury has indicted a California man with second-degree depraved heart murder after a person he allegedly sold fentanyl to died of an overdose in May of last year.

Andrew Duncanson, 25, also faces drug possession and distribution charges stemming from his recent indictment.

Duncanson was arrested and charged with drug possession around the same time last year as the death of Christian Scott Ellis but served just 30 days in jail after a one-year sentence was suspended in county District Court, on-line court records show.

Sources close to the investigation told The County Times that a lengthy investigation had determined that Duncanson had provided the fentanyl Ellis used that resulted in his overdose and death; the fentanyl was illicitly manufactured on the street, according to sources.

The depraved heart murder charge means that the prosecution will attempt to prove that Duncanson knew of the potentially lethal effects that fentanyl can have and still sold the substance to Ellis.

Last year the State's Attorney's office proceeded with eight indictments of murder and other related charges against individuals they alleged had sold opioids that resulted in fatal overdoses.

Juries did not return any murder convictions against defendants but did convict on several other serious charges including manslaughter and reckless endangerment.

State's Attorney Richard Fritz's office regarded the convictions as significant, despite no murder verdicts, because such cases were often not prosecuted; rather they were treated as tragic fatalities.

Sources close to the investigation said more indictments could be coming in subsequent months as the State's Attorney's office is seeking to continue its attack on the opioid epidemic.

Duncanson's trial is set for December in St. Mary's County Circuit Court.

For more local stories from the County Times newspapers, visit https://countytimes.somd.com or find a copy on local news stands.
 

DannyMotorcycle

Active Member
wait so this guy sold someone some drugs that killed him, got 30 days and 1 year suspended, then went and sold some more and another dumb ass bought some drugs from him and also died? did he have an expensive lawyer?
 

LightRoasted

If I may ...
If I may ...

So why are no liquor store owners brought up on charges when a customer dies from alcohol related cirrhosis of the liver? Or when a customer kills another in a vehicle crash?
 

BernieP

Resident PIA
wait so this guy sold someone some drugs that killed him, got 30 days and 1 year suspended, then went and sold some more and another dumb ass bought some drugs from him and also died? did he have an expensive lawyer?
No need, more sympathy for him than the drug addicts he killed. He merely sold them the poison, they shot it into their veins.
Isn't that the general opinion? In a way he's doing the community a favor, exterminating one addict at a time, like killing rats.
 

gary_webb

Damned glad to meet you
Ellis was terminally ill with addiction and Duncanson prescribed him a suicide pill. Easy Peasy!
 

BernieP

Resident PIA
If I may ...

So why are no liquor store owners brought up on charges when a customer dies from alcohol related cirrhosis of the liver? Or when a customer kills another in a vehicle crash?
  1. What he is selling is illegal, sales of liquor are licensed and there are health and safety inspections on the producer. The FDA does provide for warning labels, therefore it is assumed the consumer is informed - to a degree.
  2. In both situations, the car or the alcohol, if the product was sold knowing it contained a deadly defect they would likely be charged.
Heroin replaced pills because it was cheaper, but then mass quantities of fentanoyl were dumped on the market, a million times more potent than heroin and even cheaper. So the dealers cut the heroin with fentanoyl, the consumer (addict) doesn't know if or how much the heroin has been cut.
If I sold you a bottle of aresnic and labeled it as gin, should I be held liable for your death?

But you proved my point, this is why he walked. It's also hard to get convictions on dealer because the law now directs the judge to inform the jury that quantity alone does not equate to distribution. A good (public defender) can convince a jury that those bags were for his lunch, the drugs were for his personal use, .... and you will have more than enough jurors to argue reasonable doubt - because their misinformed belief is that the burden of proof has to be "beyond a reasonable doubt". Some jurors will buy any "what if" strawman crock of crap as raising a doubt.
It;s supposed to be, what would a reasonable man, a fair minded individual, see.
 
Top