Originally posted by IM4Change
Just another reason I'm glad to be American.
Originally posted by Sparx
Its happening right here in the USA too!
Ken Berman, who oversees the China and Iran Internet projects at IBB, said Anonymizer came up with the list of dirty words. "We did not," Berman said. "Basically, we said, 'Implement a porn filter.' We were looking for serious, hard-core nasty stuff to block...I couldn't come up with a list (of off-limits words) if my life depended on it."
In an e-mail to the OpenNet Initiative on Monday morning, Berman defended the concept of filtering as a way to preserve bandwidth. "Since the U.S. taxpayers are financing this program...there are legitimate limits that may be imposed," his message said. "These limits are hardly restrictive in finding any and all human rights, pro-democracy, dissident and other sites, as well as intellectual, religious, governmental and commercial sites. The porn filtering is a trade-off we feel is a proper balance and that, as noted in your Web release, frees up bandwidth for other uses and users."
The U.S. government "asked us to filter broadly based on keywords to generally restrict" Web sites, says Lance Cottrell, founder and president of San Diego-based Anonymizer. "What they didn't want to get into was something complex, fine-grained filtering which is going to try to remove all the porn. What they wanted was something that would generally remove most of the adult content while not blocking most of the information that these people need."
I don't see anything wrong.Cottrell said Anonymizer would manually unblock non-pornographic Web sites if requested by Chinese or Iranian Net surfers. "Literally, we have never been contacted with a complaint about overbroad blocking," he said.
Hypocrisy? How so?Originally posted by Warron
Isn't this the same issue that was being discussed regarding filtering of computers in libraries a few months ago?
This is nothing more then one more of the many pathetic forms of hypocrisy being practiced every day.
Anyone happen to catch this little ditty?Since the U.S. taxpayers are financing this program
I thought you were against the US interfering in the domestic policies of other nations?Originally posted by jlabsher
Ergo, by puritainizing the information they receive, we have cut off access to many sources of information that could be helpful.