First of all, thank you for your kind words....
Let me see if I can make this easier to understand. Sometimes I get going and forget that people haven't been working on these projects with me.
I do not under any circumstances want to clog up the back roads with traffic. If the people who live on the back roads wanted to deal with traffic they would have moved to a busy street. I have been behind someone who was obviously lost on a back road and it's no picnic. I want to have the signage on these routes for two reasons.
The first reason is the one stated several posts ago... Most counties maintain the roads better if they are main roads or evacuation routes. Also, grant funds may be available from the state for maintenance of county owned evacuation routes. [please note I said county roads so yes that leaves CRE roads out of this funding source].
The second reason is the one everyone is dogging me about. I would hope that we would never have to do a speedy "right now" type of evacuation but in the event you need to bypass an accident or other incident, a clearly marked route would be of great assistance. Not long ago there was a horrific incident at Sixes Road and Rt 2/4. Traffic was tied up for hours. At $3.00 a gallon or more... do you want to be wandering around in Calvert County back roads?
Now about the CRE evacuation routes. We are in the process of designing an evacuation plan. This would include working with the County to have the reverse 911 calls occur in a pattern and having our security posted at some intersections to direct traffic. If CRE put up evacuation route signs it would be helpful for some. We would also pay for our own signs. LNG has an evacuation route that goes right through CRE. They claim that the LNG is very safe but they still have a plan. With 13,000 people in one location, I feel it's important.
I also know that people don't notice evacuation route signage on a normal day to day basis. In the event they are needed, however, I feel they should be there.