Vote Flaherty said:
Yes I would, but only to bring the funds to the County's general fund. Then to properly discuss how those funds would be used. Such as building more roads to bypass usage on Rt.4. Just like the Prince Frederick loop road.
Becky, CRE already has a beautiful private freshwater lake, access to a Bay beach, twice over, campground facilities, equestrian center and more. What else do you want? What else will you pay for, and the CRE residents.
How do you envision "grant money" to be used within CRE? If something does get built in CRE, how are you with letting people outside of CRE using those facilities.
ROADS...
Without getting into specifics, there are about 100 miles of road in Calvert County that are not classified as County Roads or State Roads. We know that 66 miles are in CRE but that leaves another 34 miles in other communities. These roads use to be private. They are no longer private. They are not driveways, they are maintained by homeowners who can not afford them.
When we go pump gas the gas tax goes to the State. Then the State disperses the money to the County for the roads in the County system based on mileage. If you are buying gas and you live on a county road, the gas tax you paid in was fully returned to you. When someone who lives on one of these other roads buys gas, they get only a portion of the return.
One option that has been held out like a carrot has been the Municipality Route. CRE has been considering the question... and I am sure you realize that this would be a very costly proposition if they were to gather the necessary votes. The cost to the State and the County would be staggering at best.
Another option is to figure out a way to return the fuel tax to the communities for the roads that they maintain without current assistance. That is, if for example the county would recieve $200,000 for these roads if they were in the county system, the $200,000 would be distributed from the state through the county and into the community
for services rendered. [these figures are made up.... but we have studied the process and it is worth the hassle]
This way the County does not have to maintain the roads, the easement and liability issues are still held in the community, and the roads are maintained.
Would you be willing to lobby for that?
Parks & Rec
As for the parks & rec funds....
I didn't have CRE in mind.... yes we have wonderful amenities.... we would not turn down matching grants but I was not referring to CRE in this matter.
All over the county there are vacant lots that, according to the original plan, were to be used as community playgrounds or parks. The problem is ... in these communities platted before 1980, the park was never built and the funding source was never defined. These vacant lots do nothing to enhance the community in the condition they are in.
Last year there were grants available for Parks. DNR had $6 Million dollars that the county could have requested and then distributed.
My plan, actually, was to hand this project over to the Common Ownership Infrastructure Advisory Committee [COIAC] for planning. It's rough but it's a beginning.
Just so you know... about 18% of the county lives in these Common Ownership communities.... so it's a pretty good idea.... in my opinion....
I don't under any circumstances want to take the tax dollars of the 82% and give it to the 18% but I do want to find funds for the 18% that the 18% has already contributed to.
It's time we gave everyone in Calvert County the full use of the tax dollars they paid in. 