Charles County officer murders dog

tom88

Well-Known Member
Moron

dmh said:
No damage can be done by a dog that is chained up. The dog wasn't chained according to Long and the determination of the investigation tard! The only protection he meaning Long needs would be from himself. I don't even know what your last sentence means idiot.
Making his case, whos the Mattias? These were vicious dogs that attacked and mauled and they still were not shot. This lady had obvious markings on her and they still were not shot. They were contained and taken to animal control. To be destroyed. Long did the taxpayers a favor because of this vicious animal!

The case I am helping would be for the CCSO to train their officers better. Long should have been aware of his surroundings number 1 and number 2, if you are going to lie about something, at least make it belivable. The firemen had the dog contained prior to the cops getting there, if what your saying is true, you expect the Charles County Sheriff's Department to train it's officers to expect a dog is going to break away from it's chain? You really are stupid!

POINT IS TWO DOGS MAUL AND DONT GET SHOT -- AND THE POINT IS...THE OWNER WHO DIDN'T SHOOT THE DOGS ENDED UP IN THE HOSPITAL WITH SEVERE INJURIES, AND THE COP WHO DID WALKED AWAY WITH MINOR INJURIES YOU MORON!!!!!!!!
You really are the dumbest woman in North America!
 

dmh

New Member
tom88 said:
You really are the dumbest woman in North America!
Tom, :shutup: I could really give a flippin fart of what you think of me. I dont know you and I can not stand you. Every time I see a post from you it honestly makes me want to :barf:. You have your opinion and I have mine. I think Officer Long was wrong, Max was killed by a coward and you are a moron for thinking he was in the right.
 

tom88

Well-Known Member
dmh said:
Tom, :shutup: I could really give a flippin fart of what you think of me. I dont know you and I can not stand you. Every time I see a post from you it honestly makes me want to :barf:. You have your opinion and I have mine. I think Officer Long was wrong, Max was killed by a coward and you are a moron for thinking he was in the right.
The only thing is, my opinion counts. It is the same opinion of the experts who investigated the case. Your opinion doesn't matter a bit, except to you and the legion of tards who follow you here!
 

dmh

New Member
tom88 said:
The only thing is, my opinion counts. It is the same opinion of the experts who investigated the case. Your opinion doesn't matter a bit, except to you and the legion of tards who follow you here!
Tom, the only people that investigated this -- WAS NONE -- had it been investigated, they would have questioned the lack of evidence. This just sat on someone's desk for a few weeks, waiting until enough time had past to say -- we did something.

My opinion counts to me, and my opinion will count down the road. I have several police friends that think long wasn't in the right either. But cops have to stick together, because they never know when they may need to look out for each other -- and that's ok, but in my honest opinion, I surely would hope that someone that has to shoot a gun six times to kill a dog that is chained to a post never has to have someone else's back in a life or death situation.
 

tom88

Well-Known Member
dmh said:
Tom, the only people that investigated this -- WAS NONE -- had it been investigated, they would have questioned the lack of evidence. This just sat on someone's desk for a few weeks, waiting until enough time had past to say -- we did something.

My opinion counts to me, and my opinion will count down the road. I have several police friends that think long wasn't in the right either. But cops have to stick together, because they never know when they may need to look out for each other -- and that's ok, but in my honest opinion, I surely would hope that someone that has to shoot a gun six times to kill a dog that is chained to a post never has to have someone else's back in a life or death situation.
The dog wasn't chained to a post when it was shot. Your opinion is never going to matter. Long is not getting in any trouble and the only person who is caught in a lie in this whole thing is Mattia, when he told us his dog would never attack anyone, then we learned latter this was the dogs second attack!

So nobody investigated this. Thanks for pointing out that Mattia's story is pure conjecture! You are too stupid to even make up a legitimate argument. Go away!
 

Pandora

New Member
tom88 said:
The only thing is, my opinion counts. It is the same opinion of the experts who investigated the case. Your opinion doesn't matter a bit, except to you and the legion of tards who follow you here!
And your opinion count to "who?"

You are so arrogant that you have the nerve to say those people's opinions that are not the same as yours are "tards."

Such maturity there, you piss ant, what are you 12?
 

ITS ME

New Member
tom88 said:
The dog wasn't chained to a post when it was shot. Your opinion is never going to matter. Long is not getting in any trouble and the only person who is caught in a lie in this whole thing is Mattia, when he told us his dog would never attack anyone, then we learned latter this was the dogs second attack!

So nobody investigated this. Thanks for pointing out that Mattia's story is pure conjecture! You are too stupid to even make up a legitimate argument. Go away!
Tom -- this is quoted from Max's Moms post way back when

Max did grab a man's arm who lived across the road when he came up to our house a few winter's ago. The man APOLOGIZED to us that day, stating he was an ex-cop and should have known better, that Max was doing his job. Again, this man stated "Max was doing his job and he should not have approached him the way he did".


Now my thoughts --

I don't see where she said that Max attacked anyone, are you construing "grab an arm" as attacking? And correct me if I am wrong -- Mr. Know-It-All -- had Max attacked this man, as you so indicate, wouldn't the police have been called along with animal control to take a report???? I believe I am correct on his, and I can say that I believe 98 percent that neither the police nor animal control was called, and why and I so sure of that, well when the CCSO gave their statement and included the fact that this officer had been involved in two prior shooting and killings of dogs, I am 100 percent sure that somehow, someway there would have been a comment made about this was an aggressive dog, that the police had been called out to the property before for his vicious attack, etc. So no Tom, I have to argue against this one with you. I don't think it is the picture you are trying to make it, otherwise the CCSO would have been all over that theory of prior attacks.
 

tom88

Well-Known Member
ITS ME said:
Max did grab a man's arm who lived across the road when he came up to our house a few winter's ago. Are you serious? What do you think that Max came up to the guy, paw to arm and escorted him from the property? The point is, Max grabbed this guy's arm in an aggesive manner, and Mattia later said that Max would never do that. Mattia lied!!!


Now my thoughts --

I don't see where she said that Max attacked anyone, are you construing "grab an arm" as attacking? YES! And correct me if I am wrong -- Mr. Know-It-All -- had Max attacked this man, as you so indicate, wouldn't the police have been called along with animal control to take a report???? No! Animal control or the Police would only be called if someone wanted to call them! I believe I am correct on his, and I can say that I believe 98 percent that neither the police nor animal control was called, and why and I so sure of that, well when the CCSO gave their statement and included the fact that this officer had been involved in two prior shooting and killings of dogs, I am 100 percent sure that somehow, someway there would have been a comment made about this was an aggressive dog, that the police had been called out to the property before for his vicious attack, etc. So no Tom, I have to argue against this one with you. What are you arguing about? Mattia and the neighbor admitted that MAX grabbed the guy's arm, and the guy was injured as a result of it!
DMH. Forget it, you are the second dumbest woman in North America!
 

tom88

Well-Known Member
madMAX said:
I VOTE FOR TOM TO BE THE DUMBEST person in the world, but if we must get gender specific, the dumbest MALE in the world! :yay:
Oh your very clever. Try having an original thought!
 

tom88

Well-Known Member
u gotta love me said:
oh thats funny coming from you, considering you are the biggest :buttkiss: and rumor has it that you are that way with a certain officer.
The truth of the matter is...I have no idea who this Long is, never met him. I just know what is right is right!
 

u gotta love me

New Member
tom88 said:
The truth of the matter is...I have no idea who this Long is, never met him. I just know what is right is right!:nono:
When I was growing up it was right is wrong left is right! :lmao: So everyone that has an opinion about you and a certain officer could be right after all?
 

tom88

Well-Known Member
u gotta love me said:
When I was growing up it was right is wrong left is right! :lmao: So everyone that has an opinion about you and a certain officer could be right after all?
what are you ten? Thats right, you can't beat me on the facts, so throw gay jokes. I'm offended. Oh I should probably go, you have hurt my feelings. Grow up!
 

u gotta love me

New Member
tom88 said:
what are you ten? Thats right, you can't beat me on the facts, so throw gay jokes. I'm offended. Oh I should probably go, you have hurt my feelings. Grow up!

awwwww otter was right your feelings were going to get hurt. I am sorry tommy, me didnt mean to hurt you. YOU FLIPPIN FREAK! ha ha ha ha ha :razz:
 

tom88

Well-Known Member
u gotta love me said:
awwwww otter was right your feelings were going to get hurt. I am sorry tommy, me didnt mean to hurt you. YOU FLIPPIN FREAK! ha ha ha ha ha :razz:
You didn't hurt my feelings. Your not smart enough to hurt my feelings!
 

itsbob

I bowl overhand
dmh said:
Tom, the only people that investigated this -- WAS NONE -- had it been investigated, they would have questioned the lack of evidence. This just sat on someone's desk for a few weeks, waiting until enough time had past to say -- we did something.

.
Provide proof please...

Please tell me who should have investigated this and didn't.. and tell me what their findings were after this non-investigation.
 
Top