Charles County officer murders dog
- Thread starter allan1058
- Start date
Tomahawk202
It'll make ya feel good..
Man this post is still here....wowsers......
88stringslouie
New Member
*** (and public information proves the dog had a history of attacking) so why is a picture necessary?***
What an asinine comment! To say that the dog attacked Long (with no evidence that he was attacked), because the dog had a "history" of attacking people sounds like a second-grader building a legal case.
If you go out and murder someone, that doesn't mean that you murdered another person tomorrow.
If you are dumb enough to think that this was an unbiased investigation, that's your prerogative. If Joe Blow, the police officer comes onto my property to serve a summons, he sure as hell better not shoot my dog.
I'm telling you, you've got a whole bunch of PISSED-OFF people over this atrocity. Look at the Michael Vick case. This bozo lost 139 million dollar contract with all the trimmings of endorsements.
People take the abuse of animals seriously in this country. They are damned lucky that the courthouse wasn't trampled down over this by animal lovers.
I say let Long shoot another animal. He'll be gone and Coffey will be right behind him.
What an asinine comment! To say that the dog attacked Long (with no evidence that he was attacked), because the dog had a "history" of attacking people sounds like a second-grader building a legal case.
If you go out and murder someone, that doesn't mean that you murdered another person tomorrow.
If you are dumb enough to think that this was an unbiased investigation, that's your prerogative. If Joe Blow, the police officer comes onto my property to serve a summons, he sure as hell better not shoot my dog.
I'm telling you, you've got a whole bunch of PISSED-OFF people over this atrocity. Look at the Michael Vick case. This bozo lost 139 million dollar contract with all the trimmings of endorsements.
People take the abuse of animals seriously in this country. They are damned lucky that the courthouse wasn't trampled down over this by animal lovers.
I say let Long shoot another animal. He'll be gone and Coffey will be right behind him.
Vick and Long are two different stories. Just because someone kills a dog doesn't mean they did it illegally. What you would have people believe is that this dog, who Mattia said was docile and people believed that, until it was learned the dog attacked before, didnt attack the officer. We have evidence the officer was attacked. He was treated by the ambulance crew at the scene.88stringslouie said:*** (and public information proves the dog had a history of attacking) so why is a picture necessary?***
What an asinine comment! To say that the dog attacked Long (with no evidence that he was attacked), because the dog had a "history" of attacking people sounds like a second-grader building a legal case.
If you go out and murder someone, that doesn't mean that you murdered another person tomorrow.
If you are dumb enough to think that this was an unbiased investigation, that's your prerogative. If Joe Blow, the police officer comes onto my property to serve a summons, he sure as hell better not shoot my dog.
I'm telling you, you've got a whole bunch of PISSED-OFF people over this atrocity. Look at the Michael Vick case. This bozo lost 139 million dollar contract with all the trimmings of endorsements.
People take the abuse of animals seriously in this country. They are damned lucky that the courthouse wasn't trampled down over this by animal lovers.
I say let Long shoot another animal. He'll be gone and Coffey will be right behind him.
Now what you would have people believe is that not only is the Sheriff's Office, who has disciplined many of it's own members, to the extent they have fired police officers for misconduct, would for some reason try to cover up this one instance. Why? Why would they do that? If they were going to do that, why wouldn't they cover up every instance of misconduct? They don't! They have suspended police officers for misconduct. They have fined police officers for misconduct. They have demoted police officers for misconduct. THEY HAVE TERMINATED POLICE OFFICERS FOR MISCONDUCT! But you would have people believe they somehow covered this up. Not only would you have people belive that, but you also want us to believe that the States Attorney's Office is in on the cover up, because they certainly have declined to prosecute the officer! Then, every attorney in Waldorf is in on the cover up because none of them will take the civil case! Wow...this is an extrodinary cover up for a dead dog and an officer who is seemingly not important enough in the agency to be promoted beyond the ranks every officer is entitled to because of longevity.
Give me factual information as to why they would cover this up?
I figured you wouldn't reply because you have nothing to add except sensless dribble!88stringslouie said:*** (and public information proves the dog had a history of attacking) so why is a picture necessary?***
What an asinine comment! To say that the dog attacked Long (with no evidence that he was attacked), because the dog had a "history" of attacking people sounds like a second-grader building a legal case.
If you go out and murder someone, that doesn't mean that you murdered another person tomorrow.
If you are dumb enough to think that this was an unbiased investigation, that's your prerogative. If Joe Blow, the police officer comes onto my property to serve a summons, he sure as hell better not shoot my dog.
I'm telling you, you've got a whole bunch of PISSED-OFF people over this atrocity. Look at the Michael Vick case. This bozo lost 139 million dollar contract with all the trimmings of endorsements.
People take the abuse of animals seriously in this country. They are damned lucky that the courthouse wasn't trampled down over this by animal lovers.
I say let Long shoot another animal. He'll be gone and Coffey will be right behind him.
MiMiMi
Active Member
No matter what side you are on the comparisons you make in your post are lame. First, by virtue of the fact that the dog is an "animal" the odds of it acting in a similar manner when put in a similar situation are very good. Animals do not have the same reasoning or self control that a person has. From my experience, if a dog bites once he will bite again. As for the comparison to Michael Vick, there is no comparison between the EVIL acts of true terror that the dogs he housed were subjected to. He either participated in or allowed others to participate in torturing caged animals that in no way threatened anyones wellbeing. He TORTURED animals. He maintained a setup solely for the purpose of TORTURING animals. He made money TORTURING animals. That is why people are mad as hell at him. So whatever side you are on is your right, but lets be real about any more comparisons.88stringslouie said:*** (and public information proves the dog had a history of attacking) so why is a picture necessary?***
What an asinine comment! To say that the dog attacked Long (with no evidence that he was attacked), because the dog had a "history" of attacking people sounds like a second-grader building a legal case.
If you go out and murder someone, that doesn't mean that you murdered another person tomorrow.
If you are dumb enough to think that this was an unbiased investigation, that's your prerogative. If Joe Blow, the police officer comes onto my property to serve a summons, he sure as hell better not shoot my dog.
I'm telling you, you've got a whole bunch of PISSED-OFF people over this atrocity. Look at the Michael Vick case. This bozo lost 139 million dollar contract with all the trimmings of endorsements.
People take the abuse of animals seriously in this country. They are damned lucky that the courthouse wasn't trampled down over this by animal lovers.
I say let Long shoot another animal. He'll be gone and Coffey will be right behind him.
Last edited:
tom88 said:
I heard from a very reliable Reliable source at the CCSO that this officer is deathly afraid of dogs. Seems he is very allergic to them.
From what I understand that this officer was chasing a bad guy at one time, they let k-9 out to chase the bad guy, this officer and the dog intersected, he was bitten and IMMEDIATELY swelled up like crazy. Hummmmmm………………
Last edited:
Chasey_Lane
Salt Life
Another bump...for jetmonkey. 
Thank you very much for pointing that out. That gives the officer more than sufficient reason to shoot the dog when the dog was attacking him. If the dog was allowed to bite him, then the officer may have had a horrible reaction to being bitten. I am happy the officer was able to stop that threat before he was injured in the manner which you described.dmh said:
heavenly was
New Member
heavenly was
New Member
1500!!!!!
