Well, I guess that's better than supporting your Catholic schools through gambling.
Well, I guess that's better than supporting your Catholic schools through gambling.
I wasn't talking about bingo, I was talking about casino night for Mother Catherine or the church down the street from San Souci plaza.Number one, the cost for these talks is nothing. Number two, Christ didn't take his word just to the temples and holiest of places...Number three, still can't find the commandments of thou shall not play bingo or drink......The biggest mockery of the Eucharist to me is grape juice. I'd rather Protestant churches not offer "communion" at all--if wine was good enough for Christ why is it so taboo to you all? Christ's first public miracle was at the wedding.....I still don't know how one can take the Bible literally as so many say they do and ignore John 6 for what it commands us to do. I actually think kool aid in church pokes fingers in the eyes of Christ![]()
I wasn't talking about bingo, I was talking about casino night for Mother Catherine or the church down the street from San Souci plaza.
I find no taboo with wine personally. But then again, I also think fundamentally that communion is symbolic "in memory of me" and that Christ's proclamation that his body is bread from heaven is clearly symbolic of embracing radical discipleship through true faith and thus having life imparted. Do you believe Christ is also literally the day of Saturday? I mean afterall, the scripture also says the Sabbath is a foreshadow of Christ.
Actually I was pulling from Paul in Colossians 2.I guess that i differentiate what was said about Christ (in your example lord of the sabbath form mark i think) and what we are told Christ himself said....Not sure the church would agree with me though......Ive seen bumper stickers saying "christ said, I believe it......" He was clear in John 6 about the bread of life in my opinion....
I see what you mean, but don't agree though. Same Holy Spirit through and through.I'm not talking about the epistles. I understand and for the most part agree with you assertion of ot foreshadowing of nt events. I was simply stating, right or wrong, church's consent or not, I tend to differentiate between Paul's writings, etc., and the gospels stating, and then Jesus said.....I place these quotes if you will higher in the hierarchy of scripture (again, right or wrong)
Fair enough, and I may be teetering on heresy, but I know most Christians are a little less confident if you will in some books of the Bible than others; and I'm not talking about the apocrypha. If you are honest, you'd agree....I see what you mean, but don't agree though. Same Holy Spirit through and through.![]()
All faiths and ages invited!!
Some are, especially liberal members amongst some "mainline" Protestant churches. A lot would probably side with Bart Erhman or the Jesus Seminar (Fair enough, and I may be teetering on heresy, but I know most Christians are a little less confident if you will in some books of the Bible than others; and I'm not talking about the apocrypha. If you are honest, you'd agree....
Just to clarify, I don't take Jesus's reference to bread to mean His physical presence in the wafer AKA Transubstantiation. I believe He literally is the "bread that came down from heaven" that gives eternal life. But "bread" is used by Him as a play on the Manna narrative, to demonstrate mainly the all consuming nature of discipleship (as if He is our very food). I think of it similar to how we say a rabid fan "eats, drinks, and breathes football". Except that it doesn't even come close...in fact its quite crude, but it makes the point I think. Being a disciple of Christ is a similar mindset taken to the nth degree and total dependence of what Christ did on the cross where He sacrificed His FLESH. The fan doesn't literally eat the game, just as we don't literally eat Jesus actual flesh (isn't that cannibalism of some degree?). We "eat" of the sacrifice. Its our only true sustenance. Jesus also uses similar imagery and symbolism in the beatitudes. Do we also literally eat and drink righteousness in solid or liquid form?That being said, since you say John 6 is not to be taken literally, I'd love to hear what you do with Revelation..
How cool! Hang out, eat and drink, and get a service and fellowship with other Christians. I think it's a great idea!
some are, especially liberal members amongst some "mainline" protestant churches. A lot would probably side with bart erhman or the jesus seminar ()before they would christian scholars who believe in inerrancy and inspiration. Notable would be 2 peter or the aforementioned gospel of john. I don't think you would find much doubt though amongst me or my evangelical brethren such as southern baptists and presbyterians (pca or opc). Just to clarify, i don't take jesus's reference to bread to mean his physical presence in the wafer aka transubstantiation. I believe he literally is the "bread that came down from heaven" that gives eternal life. But "bread" is used by him as a play on the manna narrative, to demonstrate mainly the all consuming nature of discipleship (as if he is our very food). I think of it similar to how we say a rabid fan "eats, drinks, and breathes football". Except that it doesn't even come close...in fact its quite crude, but it makes the point i think. Being a disciple of christ is a similar mindset taken to the nth degree and total dependence of what christ did on the cross where he sacrificed his flesh. The fan doesn't literally eat the game, just as we don't literally eat jesus actual flesh (isn't that cannibalism of some degree?). We "eat" of the sacrifice. Its our only true sustenance. Jesus also uses similar imagery and symbolism in the beatitudes. Do we also literally eat and drink righteousness in solid or liquid form? It also demonstrates the superiority of the new covenant over the old. The new in christ give everlasting life and sufficiency, while the old was only temporary and israel became hungry again and was not satisfied. As for revelation, let's just say that i am not into "left behind" or any of that other related pop eschatology and am probably closer to what your views probably are than you thought.
![]()
Or maybe Jesus preferred metaphors over similes?