Chesapeake Blue Crab Population Stable, But Low

Lilypad

Well-Known Member
Blue crabs in the Chesapeake Bay are holding steady, but fishing limits still are needed, a three-state commission concluded Tuesday.

The Chesapeake Bay Commission, a study group set up by state lawmakers in Maryland, Virginia and Pennsylvania, estimated the blue crab population last year at about 350 million. That's several million more crabs than a low point in 2001, but well below historical levels. More than 800 million blue crabs were thought to be in the bay in 1990.

Scientists who conducted the survey said it was good news that the blue crab population is stable, but water quality and habitat loss are still a concern. The best news, they said, was that catch limits imposed by the states in 2002 are being followed. Last year was the first in which watermen caught fewer crabs than the limit.

"The take-home message is that the condition of the blue crab population has improved," said Thomas Miller, professor at the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, who worked on the survey.

Watermen last year caught about 60 million pounds of crabs. The catch was about 37 percent of the crab population. Before the limits, watermen took about 72 percent of the bay's crabs in 1999.

The catch is now regulated by the Virginia, Maryland and the Potomac River Fisheries Commission. The survey noted that catch limits are helping preserve the population and should be continued.

"The reason why this is very significant is because several years ago there were some alarming trends with blue crabs," said Ann Swanson, head of the commission.

There were points of worry for scientists, too. Survey authors noted that low-oxygen zones in the bay last year meant less habitat for the crabs. They also pointed out that fewer grass beds on the bay floor may be contributing to high juvenile mortality rates and that population surveys this year pointed to a return to lower numbers.

Swanson said the survey shows that fishing limits are effective and should be maintained. "The blue crab should be able to rebuild its abundance, but we have to keep the fishing pressure" low, she said.

How long has this same conversation being going on??
Are crabs going to have the same fate as oysters?
 
I guess these folks know what they are talking about. Before the start of the season they predicted a great crab catch this year. To tell the truth I havent seen it. The first of the year we had some great crabbing, plenty of large fat crabs, but she's gone a a bit downhill now. I was doing better with my trot line last year. The potters arent bragging either. Right now most everythinn is too small and mostly poor. Maybe it will pick up in September. Plenty of bait eaters out there right now, Not too many keepers.
 

Lilypad

Well-Known Member
Tom Sawyer said:
I guess these folks know what they are talking about. Before the start of the season they predicted a great crab catch this year. To tell the truth I havent seen it. The first of the year we had some great crabbing, plenty of large fat crabs, but she's gone a a bit downhill now. I was doing better with my trot line last year. The potters arent bragging either. Right now most everythinn is too small and mostly poor. Maybe it will pick up in September. Plenty of bait eaters out there right now, Not too many keepers.

Isn't the season from April-December 15?
Dang, when do the critters get a chance to hibernate?
 

willie

Well-Known Member
I just don't get the message of why it is legal to catch and keep any female crab. When I was raised on the Severn River, it was not done and the reasons were so obvious that they didn't have to be explained even to a child.
 

Lilypad

Well-Known Member
willie said:
I just don't get the message of why it is legal to catch and keep any female crab. When I was raised on the Severn River, it was not done and the reasons were so obvious that they didn't have to be explained even to a child.
I agree 100%, that was 1 of the first things my daddy taught me!! :yay:

Here is the link to the report:

http://www.chesbay.state.va.us/home.htm
 
I believe you mean to say you dont understand why female crabs are allowed to be kept at all. Females have to be as large as any other crab to be kept 51/4 inches.

I am no expert just a weekend crabber but as it is explained to me Female crabs over 5 1/4 inches do not breed or lay eggs any more. Whether they do or not I cant say.

As for the season it usually starts when the oyster season is over and ends when the water clears up in the fall around here. When the water gets colder the crabs go into the mud and hybernate til the next year when they come out of the mud and the season starts again.

Now we get into where do the winter crabs come from?
Well some come up from Louissianna and the Carolinas and other are dredged up out of the mud in Virginia. Should they be dredged from the mud where they have gone to hybernate? Well most Marylanders say no. But that hasnt stopped it.
 

dck4shrt

New Member
willie said:
I just don't get the message of why it is legal to catch and keep any female crab. When I was raised on the Severn River, it was not done and the reasons were so obvious that they didn't have to be explained even to a child.

Keeping female crabs isn't necessarily going to affect the population size of the next generation, if the population size of the next generation isn't set by the total number of eggs produced. If it is controlled by the total number of juveniles showing up as a function of the amount of habitat (read: seagrass bed losses) then you don't need all that many females to contribute to the next generation, as each female can produce hundreds of thousands of eggs.
 

willie

Well-Known Member
dck4shrt said:
Keeping female crabs isn't necessarily going to affect the population size of the next generation, if the population size of the next generation isn't set by the total number of eggs produced. If it is controlled by the total number of juveniles showing up as a function of the amount of habitat (read: seagrass bed losses) then you don't need all that many females to contribute to the next generation, as each female can produce hundreds of thousands of eggs.
I'm not sure what you mean with all those "ifs" but seagrass is only part of the problem. Others say the abundance of Rockfish are eating up the young crabs and there is the pollution factor. Common sense will tell you that the more baby crabs (Zoe's??) that are spawned, the more that will survive. Mature females of any size can be harvested (not sponge crabs) and that's dumb. She can spawn several times after being impregnated so the chances of her carrying more eggs is great. Why anyone would want to eat one of those is beyond me, they stink and taste awful. Immature females are caught in large quantities as peelers and this is wrong and it is a huge part of the problem.
 
Last edited:

dck4shrt

New Member
willie said:
I'm not sure what you mean with all those "ifs" but seagrass is only part of the problem. Others say the abundance of Rockfish are eating up the young crabs and there is the pollution factor. Common sense will tell you that the more baby crabs (Zoe's??) that are spawned, the more that will survive. Mature females of any size can be harvested (not sponge crabs) and that's dumb. She can spawn several times after being impregnated so the chances of her carrying more eggs is great. Why anyone would want to eat one of those is beyond me, they stink and taste awful. Immature females are caught in large quantities as peelers and this is wrong and it is a huge part of the problem.

I don't think that common sense will tell you that the more zoea that are spawned, the more that will survive. Especially not if the habitat will support less than the number spawned. If that's the case, then there will be a 'bottleneck' in terms of population size at the zoea or megalopae stage. There will be competition for space/habitat/food/whatever somewhere along the lines, and it's entirely possible that common sense will tell you that the size of the spawning stock might not be the controlling factor. In most of the fisheries throughout the world, the larval or juvenile stage is where you encounter extremely high and variable mortality rates and hence this is when the size of the population is determined (within an order of magnitude). Of course, protecting some of the spawners is always important for maintaining the population, but it's not necessarily the lynch pin to having more crabs in the bay.
 
Last edited:

chernmax

NOT Politically Correct!!
Tom Sawyer said:
I believe you mean to say you dont understand why female crabs are allowed to be kept at all. Females have to be as large as any other crab to be kept 51/4 inches.

Summary of 2006 Recreational Crab Regulations


Minimum Size (No minimum size for mature females): APRIL 1 - JULY 14 JULY 15 - DECEMBER 15
5 " Male Hard 5 1/4" Male Hard
3 1/4" Peeler 3 1/2" Peeler

The minimum size for soft crab is 3 1/2 inches during the entire season.

Source reference: http://www.dnr.state.md.us/fisheries/crab/2004recreationalcrabsummary.html
 
Top