Why else would you take the time to look up all those sources and post them? What other possible reason could there be that you want to get pissy and go to the mat over a freaking pillow company? I'd say who cares about a damn pillow company, but you clearly care very much.
Now, I know damn well you're smart enough to understand what I'm saying. And you know damn well I'm smart enough to not fall for your doublespeak and feigned innocence. Can we PLEASE dispense with the dishonesty?
You can start by acknowledging the fact that;
1). I didn't start a thread about a pillow company.
2). A single google search results in plenty of information. In particular, one Consumer Reports article links to all three BBB and tax issues My Pillow has endured that I posted.
I'm incredibly sorry that you feel that taking the time to provide research (albeit a very short Google search and copy-paste job) is a big enough deal that YOU felt the need to jump in and paint me as being a part of this "boycott" for pointing out the ####ty-ness of My Pillow (in a thread about it, that I didn't start, yet am being chastised for providing info about), but that doesn't make your posts any more correct.
And no, I don't know what you're saying because you start off by posting false information about me based on a made-up assumption in your head. You've now moved on past that when pointed out how idiotic it was, and we're at the point where you feel the need to insert your superiority complex by acting like any of my posts in this thread have been dishonest.
In the future, in order to prevent making incorrect assumptions and making incredibly ridiculous (yet funny) statements like "Can we PLEASE dispense with the dishonesty?", try ASKING what I mean. Try asking what my stance is on a subject. And most of all, try reading my posts without that little voice in your head saying "I don't want to read what he types, but I just KNOW it's something I don't like".
I know, I know, crazy right? Enough people on the forum make assumptions about each other that it's just second nature.
That's right out of the Leftist playbook. A complete and perfect strawman. Good job! Your handlers must be so proud.
PS, you already know that when you start your posts that way I'm not going to read any further. I can only presume that was your goal.
What strawman? Do you know that definition?
Libertarians do not believe in government intervening in businesses. You're mad that I, as a libertarian/Libertarian, am not more upset that the govt. didn't step in? What universe does that make sense in?
You won't read it anyway, so what's the problem?
I'm not saying youre not correct, just asking... Such as?