Chris Christie

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
It's embarrassing that I used to like him.

He did a speech thing and when the crowd booed him continuously this is how he responded:

“Your anger, your anger, your anger against the truth is reprehensible," Christie said.

"As people watch today, if your arguments are so strong, if your arguments are so great and mine are so bad, then just keep quiet. Let me make my awful arguments, and then you can just reject them outta hand. But the problem is you fear the truth. The problem is you wanna shout down any voice that says anything different than what you want to hear.”

Bold strategy.....

:roflmao:

 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
The TDS has destroyed the man's mind. He got turned down as Vice President and Chief of Staff and he is holding a grudge against Trump.
It has nothing to do with Trumps eligibility or his record as President, It has everything to do with this fat ass whole getting his feelings hurt when Trump passed him up. As it turned out it was a good move, the hurt little child has shown he was more interested in the job than the country.

Not that , that is any different from most professional politicians.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
It's embarrassing that I used to like him.
You and me both, and it's because he was the first Republican who consistently told people to eff off if they didn't like it. After generations of polite "statesman" like responses from the GOP, it was refreshing to hear one of them say, sit down, you're full of crap. Even Reagan was polite - most of the time - but he was also massively witty and knew how to utterly devastate someone while not being crude.

It's just that his rude approach is old news, now. We now have plenty of Republicans and on air punditry who will tell the Democrats they are full of chit, after decades of them doing it to the right, daily, in public and no reaction from the press. I am STILL kind of pissed at remarks from the likes of Al Gore referring to the right wing as "extra chromosome" as though calling them something like that is still FUNNY these days - but it totally typefies the kind of crap we all received from them.

It felt good that SOMEONE had the brass to give it back. NOW he's turned his guns on REPUBLICANS who don't agree with him, and while his candicacy never stood a chance, he's now persona non grata in Republican circles.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
I was just reading FiveThirtyEight. Christie has not only the highest unfavorability among Republicans, they are off the chain unfavorable.
You know who comes in second? Christie, last week. The guy has like zero appeal.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
I was just reading FiveThirtyEight. Christie has not only the highest unfavorability among Republicans, they are off the chain unfavorable.
You know who comes in second? Christie, last week. The guy has like zero appeal.

Which makes you wonder why he's still there, and I'm betting the answer is: because someone is paying him to do this. There's no other reason I can think of.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Hate and spite. He felt he should have gotten a big time job in the Trump administration and Trump ignored him.
Sl now it's payback time , only instead of getting payback from Trump he is making a fool of himself and destroying any respect he may have had before.
 

BernieP

Resident PIA
He may be getting Campaign funds from some Trump-hater like Soros, or even one of the Representatives like Pelosi.
Democrats are funding the 14th Amendment challenges to Trump being on any ballot. Why pour money into the primary.
I'd look at Romney and Lez Cheney and possibly the Bush family
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Follow the money, a Rich RINO
Why does ANYONE run, who seriously has no chance? Borgum, Hutchinson - Christie? They never had a chance even IF Trump magically disappeared.

I hadn’t thought of being bankrolled by an anti-Trump person. I just figured pols did this for the fun, attention, notoriety - the jazz of it all. And maybe pocketing some.

But nobody DONATES for no reason. Nobody dumps money on a candidate with zero future for NOTHING. I never understand campaign politics - does more go on, at those fundraisers? Who donates tens of thousands - or more - to a loser who can’t even get 1% of the polling?
 

BernieP

Resident PIA
Why does ANYONE run, who seriously has no chance? Borgum, Hutchinson - Christie? They never had a chance even IF Trump magically disappeared.

I hadn’t thought of being bankrolled by an anti-Trump person. I just figured pols did this for the fun, attention, notoriety - the jazz of it all. And maybe pocketing some.

But nobody DONATES for no reason. Nobody dumps money on a candidate with zero future for NOTHING. I never understand campaign politics - does more go on, at those fundraisers? Who donates tens of thousands - or more - to a loser who can’t even get 1% of the polling?
PACs. Nothing more than faceless, nameless lobbyists. Some speculate that most are running for VP or some other office if Trump should win.

Trump isn't going to win because the elites don't want him in office. If you want to know who the elites are, just look at the logs for the Lolita Express. Or look at who shows up in Davos for the World Economic Forum. I see at least two states that will block Trump for the ballot, California and New York. California democrats are more loyal to the CCP than the US because the CCP has bought state bonds, the state pension funds are heavily invested in China and money from the CCP flows into their political campaigns. Albany is now more corrupt than NYC and that says a lot.
Also Illinois may be a good spot to block him from the ballot. All large one party states, with lots of donors (PACS) willing to put up millions to keep Trump off the ballot.
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
Too funny not to post...

S-kkHEtVaZCii-FYckjIq_Vu44EFCAtz8gYwYqqd3Tg.jpg
 
Top