Chuckie Schumer - Misinformation and Hyperbole
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
Democrats on the side of terrorists.....shocker.
WingsOfGold
Well-Known Member
Jooo Lite
WingsOfGold
Well-Known Member
Screwmers favorite book. Ever see the skank he's married to?
Stupid phuck, went ugly early.
Stupid phuck, went ugly early.
Popcorn Alert: The Schumer Shutdown Fight Leaves Democrats in a No-Win Situation
These people have painted themselves into a heck of a corner.
Erick Erickson wrote on Thursday morning:
No matter what the Democrats do, they’re doing it while holding the rope that Trump will hang them with. Either way, the Trump administration wins — not only in terms of policy but also in the realm of public relations.
Get that popcorn ready. This ought to be fun to watch.
Ain't it fun to watch the Democrats sabotage themselves at every turn? I know I'm enjoying it, and our PJ Media VIPs are in on all the fun, too.
Schumer’s attempted shutdown will backfire bigly
By Thomas LifsonRepublicans, accustomed to being blamed by the media for federal government shutdowns, should not worry about Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s plan to oppose cloture on the “clean” funding bill Speaker Johnson’s House just passed. There are multiple good reasons why they can relax on this one:
Schumer is the perfect opponent for Trump
Schumer is widely understood to be a phony. His infamous “cheeseburger picture” purporting to demonstrate what an ordinary guy he is establishes that perspective indelibly. Its piece of cheese sitting atop a raw patty of beef is gag-inducing.
If, in an alternative universe, your family had been invited over to your neighbors, the Schumers, for a backyard barbecue and your kids saw that, you’d hastily pull them aside and urgently tell them never, ever to serve raw beef under a piece of melted cheese. (If you happened to be observant Jews, you’d also tell them to stick to the hot dogs because the burgers ain’t kosher.)
Schumer’s phony grin seals the deal.
Trump and DOGE can use the shutdown to accelerate their agenda of slimming down the federal bureaucracy
Ben Domenech provided a priceless TV moment earlier this week on Fox News as he responded to Jessica Tarlov, who pushed the standard Dem talking point that layoffs of federal bureaucrats are a human tragedy (“How many people are enough for you?”):
Remember that “essential” services continue. No Social Security or Medicare payments will stop. But “non-essential bureaucrats” are furloughed. Permanently. Best of all, Trump will not engage in the stupid game of putting up barriers to prevent the public from entering national parks.
I can hardly wait for Schumer and the Dems to start telling voters that protecting the jobs of non-essential bureaucrats is critical to the health of the Republic.
Oh please, Br’er Schumer, don’t throw Trump in that briar patch!
Schumer Caves on CR, Blames Trump for His Own Surrender!
“For sure, the Republican bill is a terrible option. It is not a clean CR,” he complained. “It doesn’t address far too many of this country’s needs. But I believe allowing Donald Trump to take even more, even much more power via a government shutdown is a far worse option.”
Schumer, who spent weeks attacking Republicans for allegedly following Trump’s lead, said the situation was a “Hobson’s choice,” meaning that there was no real alternative. “Either proceed with the bill before us or… risk Donald Trump throwing America into the chaos of a shutdown,” he declared. “This, in my view, is no choice at all.”
That’s cute. Something tells me that Democrat polling showed that the public was going to blame the Democrats for the shutdown, and that’s what this is really about.
Just days ago, Schumer insisted that Democrats had put forward “a sensible way [to] fund the government for another month,” only for Republicans to reject it “outright.” He accused the GOP of bowing to Trump and claimed, “Donald Trump doesn’t want the appropriators to do their job. He wants full control over government spending.” Blah, blah, blah.
The same Schumer who just called Trump a “nihilist” who “wielded chaos like a weapon” is now falling in line to support a Republican bill he despises. After spending weeks accusing Republicans of being “sycophants and MAGA radicals who want to burn everything to the ground,” Schumer is now voting for their CR — an admission that he lost this fight.
Isn't that always the answer when someone has you by the short hairs, blame that someone? ... eek"Blames Trump for his own surrender"....
omg....
What is a "clean" CR? Seems everyone has a different definition.
Jerry Nadler didn't touch it.
Clem72
Well-Known Member
Common sense would say a clean CR would have no authorization for NEW efforts/expenses. It would continue to fund agencies at the same "level" with same authorizations as the last approved budget. This might not be the same exact funding, some projects will complete (like finishing a MILCON building), others will increase in costs (like moving from design to prototype of a ship or aircraft), but most of the big guys (the entitlements) would remain the same since they are authorized year to year rather than 3/5/7 year cycles.