Climate Change Will Have Dire Health Consequences

Salmon

Member
Climate change deniers are dangerous people..
A new report from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warns of dire consequences if governments don't make "rapid, far-reaching, and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society" to stem global warming. But the planet isn't the only thing at risk as temperatures rise; your health might be in danger, too.
Here are six ways that climate change might affect you, whether it's insect-borne disease or Type 2 diabetes:

1. Contaminated water sources and dangerous bacterial infections

2. An increase in mental health issues

3. An increase in Type 2 diabetes

4. Respiratory problems and stroke

5. More car crashes and fewer food inspections

6. An increase in disease-carrying mosquitoes and ticks

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/10/12/health/climate-change-health-effects/index.html
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Climate change deniers are dangerous people..

Here are six ways that climate change might affect you, whether it's insect-borne disease or Type 2 diabetes:

Be Specific What Scientific Proof is there of Man Made Global Climate Warming Change



might1
mīt/Submit
verb
modal verb: might
1.
past of may1, used especially.
in reported speech, expressing possibility or permission.
"he said he might be late"
expressing a possibility based on a condition not fulfilled.
"we might have won if we'd played better"
expressing annoyance about something that someone has not done.
"you might have told me!"
expressing purpose.
"he avoided social engagements so that he might work"
2.
used in questions and requests.
tentatively asking permission.
"might I ask one question?"
expressing a polite request.
"you might just call me Jane, if you don't mind"
asking for information, especially condescendingly.
"and who might you be?"
3.
used to express possibility or make a suggestion.
 
Last edited:

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2015/02/09/top-10-global-warming-lies-that-may-shock-you/#2c9649b053a5


Alarmist Assertion #2

“Lyme Disease Spreads” – Warmer temperatures are contributing to the range expansion and severity of tick-borne Lyme disease.”

The Facts

Lyme Disease is much more common in northern, cooler regions of the United States than in southern, warmer regions. Asserting, without any supporting data or evidence, that a disease that prospers in cool climates will become more prevalent as a result of global warming defies objective data and common sense. Moreover, a team of scientists extensively researched Lyme Disease climate and habitat and reported in the peer-reviewed science journal EcoHealth, “the only environmental variable consistently association with increased [Lyme Disease] risk and incidence was the presence of forests.”

Granted, alarmists can argue that forests are thriving under global warming, with the result that forest-dwelling ticks will also benefit. However, expanding forests are universally – and properly – viewed as environmentally beneficial. Alarmist attempts to frame thriving forests as harmful perfectly illustrate the alarmists’ proclivity to claim anything and everything – no matter how beneficial – is severely harmful and caused by global warming.



In Their Own Words: Climate Alarmists Debunk Their 'Science'

How Climate Alarmism Advances International Political Agendas:

The term “climate” is typically associated with annual world-wide average temperature records measured over at least three decades. Yet global warming observed less than two decades after many scientists had predicted a global cooling crisis prompted the United Nations to organize an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and to convene a continuing series of international conferences purportedly aimed at preventing an impending catastrophe. Virtually from the beginning, they had already attributed the “crisis” to human fossil-fuel carbon emissions.

A remark from Maurice Strong, who organized the first U.N. Earth Climate Summit (1992) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil revealed the real goal: “We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse.”
 

Salmon

Member
Is misinformation about the climate criminally negligent?

We have good reason to consider the funding of climate denial to be criminally and morally negligent. The charge of criminal and moral negligence ought to extend to all activities of the climate deniers who receive funding as part of a sustained campaign to undermine the public’s understanding of scientific consensus.
^^^^ I agree

http://theconversation.com/is-misinformation-about-the-climate-criminally-negligent-23111
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
there NO Proof of man made climate change

environmentalists keep getting caught LYING and Cooking the NUMBERS



https://insideclimatenews.org/news/04052017/global-warming-hiatus-debunked-climate-science


Is it time to finally stop talking about the so-called global warming hiatus?

For years, the idea of a hiatus, or a "pause" in global warming between 1998 and 2012, was used by climate change skeptics as evidence that the earth wasn't actually getting that much hotter. This was despite a significant body of science showing that the data underpinning the doubters' argument was flawed and that it was unlikely that any meaningful hiatus had occurred.

A new analysis in the journal Nature took a comprehensive look at what had been published on both sides of the issue. It found that a number of inconsistencies among studies proposing a hiatus—including variations in how the term "hiatus" was defined—led to cascading confusion. The study also pointed to some lessons for communicating climate science in the future.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Climate change lies are exposed

A high-level inquiry into the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found there was “little evidence” for its claims about global warming.

It also said the panel had emphasised the negative impacts of climate change and made “substantive findings” based on little proof.

The review by the InterAcademy Council (IAC) was launched after the IPCC’s hugely embarrassing 2007 benchmark climate change report, which contained exaggerated and false claims that Himalayan glaciers could melt by 2035.

The panel was forced to admit its key claim in support of global warming was lifted from a 1999 magazine article. The report was based on an interview with a little-known Indian scientist who has since said his views were “speculation” and not backed by research.
 

PeoplesElbow

Active Member
Numbers 1 & 6 maybe, we don't really know.

Numbers 2-5 complete horse ####, we might as well add some other things like better video games, a change in the play style of the NFL, and a trend in kitchen appliances to the pastel colors of the late 50's and early 60's.

Also one thing never spoken about are the possible positives that come out of climate change, nothing ever only has negative consequences.

This is all predicated on if climate change is actually something real or not, which it might not be.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
The only desperation the UN is responding to is their dismay that the US isn't falling for the massive wealth transfer scheme that the Magic Negro had previously tried to sign us up for.
 
Top