CNN.com's use of Octoshape puts readers on edge

R

RadioPatrol

Guest
whom do you really trust when you install an app from a Legit site ....


CNN.com's use of Octoshape puts readers on edge
By Dennis O'Reilly

Last week's Top Story on CNN.com prompting visitors to install an application named Octoshape application hit home with many readers who had been stung by the program.

The backlash is directed at the sneaky nature of the Octoshape installation rather than against P2P technology, which can benefit users and providers alike when correctly implemented.

When it comes to applying new technology, there's a right way and a wrong way. People who inadvertently installed the Octoshape peer-to-peer application prior to watching CNN.com's live video stream of President Obama's inauguration on Jan. 20 bumped head-first into the wrong way.

Among the victims of CNN.com's drive-by download was a reader named Ron:

* "Thanks for the great article on Octoshape. I became aware that something was running but was not able to discover what app was the culprit 'til your article on CNN's adding of Octoshape for the live stream on Jan 20.

"I watch CNN for a number of reasons and never felt the need to be concerned about what they might add to my system. You have opened my eyes to the methods that can be used to compromise an individual PC. Great article. This is the type of article I keep an eye out for when I get your newsletter."

As the story by WS editorial director Brian Livingston pointed out, there's nothing new about P2P. As with so many technologies, the key to winning customers over to the idea of sharing their bandwidth is being up-front about how P2P will be implemented and — most importantly — how to turn it off.

Reader Tim Monk provides a U.K. perspective on a service that is much more considerate in its use of P2P:

* "I read [last week's Top Story] with some interest. Over this side of the pond, I've been using the British Broadcasting Corporation's iPlayer (making much of their extensive produced-for-TV content across all their channels) since mid-2007. As one would tend to expect, their approach was from the beginning peer-to-peer based using Kontiki, but this was relatively clearly explained before signing up and could be easily opted out of at setup or any time later.

"The opportunity of swift availability of the latest episodes and the openness about the P2P nature meant that I often felt happy to be a good citizen and help other users, as they helped me — I could see all the connected machines in the TCP list supplying me on [Sysinternals'] Process Explorer. (Thanks, Windows Secrets!)

"Interestingly, although many U.K. ISPs run capacity-restricted packages, the main backlash was not about P2P, but from the ISPs about capacity and from users about DRM [digital rights management]. So the latest versions of the BBC iPlayer turn their back on P2P and also offer multiple platforms for on-demand or for download. Over here, we think the BBC has responded creatively as a public service provider in the face of sniping from the Rupert Murdoch–owned media channels.

"This [BBC] blog entry provides some background on the new changes, avoiding Octoshape-type issues experienced with Kontiki."

Big media companies such as CNN don't always get technology right the first time, but we trust that with a little forethought and a lot of listening to customers, they'll get it right eventually.


and with ISP's capping bandwidth usage and charging you for going over .... now who is paying for CNN to redistribute news .......... :yikes:
 
Top