Comments please....

Roberta

OLD WISE ONE
The women put an AD on Craig's list. It's in the story.

I know, but the AD is no longer available. I read about this story when it happened. I don't think they quoted the AD then either. I guess the news paper story is not enough for some peoples childern.
 

Lenny

Lovin' being Texican
I know, but the AD is no longer available. I read about this story when it happened. I don't think they quoted the AD then either. I guess the news paper story is not enough for some peoples childern.


But then you're too stupid to notice that nhboy posted the link 12 minutes before you did. Damn but you are the most stupid person on forms (second only to JPC Sr.)
 

awpitt

Main Streeter
Here it is.Woman Pleads Guilty for 'Free' Phony Ad

I'd have to read the full ad before voting and there may be may more to the story.
The article says she claimed the ad was for stuff that was sitting outside. She wanted people to take it before it went to the dump. I'd have to see the wording on the ad before passing judgement. Regardless of what the ad said, if she posted the ad without the aunt's permission, she should have spent at least some time in jail.
 

greyhound

New Member
I know, but the AD is no longer available. I read about this story when it happened. I don't think they quoted the AD then either. I guess the news paper story is not enough for some peoples childern.

Quote from news story:
"Her attorney, Ted Rogge, said the ad was for items that were outside the house."

:coffee:
 

virgovictoria

Tight Pants and Lipstick
PREMO Member
'Tis our judicial system. :shrug: Blackwell was offered a plea. IMO, this usually means that there wasn't enough evidence to support a solid guilty verdict, OR it wasn't worth the time. In most cases, if this was Blackwell's first offense, she would have been offered some kind of deal anyway.
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
The article says she claimed the ad was for stuff that was sitting outside. She wanted people to take it before it went to the dump. I'd have to see the wording on the ad before passing judgement. Regardless of what the ad said, if she posted the ad without the aunt's permission, she should have spent at least some time in jail.

Quote from news story:
"Her attorney, Ted Rogge, said the ad was for items that were outside the house."

:coffee:
From the story:
Investigators said Blackwell told them she posted the ad to get back at her aunt, who had been feuding with Blackwell's mother.
She said one thing to investigators, then changed her story when her lawyer told her to.

Guilty. Deserved more time than she got.


But then you're too stupid to notice that nhboy posted the link 12 minutes before you did. Damn but you are the most stupid person on forms (second only to JPC Sr.)
:yay:
 
Top