CONCERNS OVER INTEGRITY OF mRNA MOLECULES IN SOME COVID19 VACCINES

[3CATSAILOR]

While we are told that the vaccines are "safe" and "effective", there appears to be a growing concern over the "integrity" of mRNA molecules in some of the covid-19 vaccines. Before all of this, there was more trust in those that are pushing the vaccines. I realize more and more people have significantly increased their questions about the vaccines. If there was and perhaps still is concerns over the integrity of the mRNA molecules, I think the questions will continue to accumulate. If they are unanswered or deflected, it simply builds more questions than answers. ​

​

​

Concerns over integrity of mRNA molecules in some covid-19 vaccines​

Findings highlight the fragilities of the manufacturing process, but companies aren't willing to release information

Documents leaked from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) following a cyber attack in December show that some early commercial batches of Pfizer-BioNTech’s covid-19 vaccine had lower than expected levels of intact mRNA molecules.

These molecules instruct our cells to make a harmless piece of coronavirus protein, triggering an immune response and protecting us from infection if the real virus enters our bodies.

The complete, intact mRNA molecule is essential to the potency of the vaccine.

But in a special report for The BMJ today, journalist Serena Tinari shows that the EMA was concerned about the difference in quality between clinical batches and proposed commercial batches of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

Specifically, EMA had major concerns over unexpectedly low quantities (around 55%) of intact mRNA in batches of the vaccine developed for commercial production.

It is an issue relevant not just to Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine but also to those produced by Moderna, CureVac, and others, as well as a “second generation” mRNA vaccine being pursued by Imperial College London.

In an email dated 23 November, a high ranking EMA official outlined a raft of issues. In short, commercial manufacturing was not producing vaccines to the specifications expected, and regulators were unsure of the implications on safety and efficacy.

EMA responded by filing two “major objections” with Pfizer, along with a host of other questions it wanted addressed.

Ultimately, on 21 December, EMA authorised Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine and a report published on its website, noted, “the quality of this medicinal product, submitted in the emergency context of the current (covid-19) pandemic, is considered to be sufficiently consistent and acceptable.”

However, it’s unclear how the agency’s concerns were satisfied, writes Tinari.

The BMJ asked Pfizer, Moderna, and CureVac, as well as several regulators, what percentage mRNA integrity they consider acceptable for vaccines against covid-19.

None offered any specifics, and in subsequent correspondence, EMA, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Canadian medicines regulator Health Canada all stated that specific information related to the acceptability criteria is confidential.

Pfizer also declined to comment on what percentage mRNA integrity it is aiming for, nor would it address questions about the cause of the unexpectedly low percentage mRNA integrity in certain batches, leaving open the question of whether it could happen again.

Moderna declined to respond to any of The BMJ’s questions, while CureVac told The BMJ that “it is too soon to give details.”

The shortage of information may reflect the lack of certainty, even among regulators, about how to assess the evidence fully for this novel technology, suggests Tinari.

Professor of biopharmaceutics, Daan J.A. Crommelin, told The BMJ that, “For small, low molecular weight products, the active pharmaceutical ingredient integrity is typically close to 100%.”

But for mRNA vaccines? “Experience with mRNA integrity is limited.”

[Ends]

10/03/21

Notes for editors

Investigation: The European Medicines Agency covid-19 vaccine leak: what does it tell us about mRNA instability?

Journal: The BMJ

Link to Academy of Medical Sciences press release labelling system: https://press.psprings.co.uk/AMSlabels.pdf

Externally peer reviewed? Yes
Evidence type: Investigation
Subject: mRNA vaccines for covid-19

 

[LightRoasted]

For our consideration ...

There is no such thing as “getting sick”. You don't “catch a cold” or “get covid”. Your body releases toxins, all day, every day. If your body has a lot of toxins it will be a strong release. Various factors can trigger the release. Changes in the atmosphere can be a trigger. This is what happens seasonally. Most people in the USA have a lot of toxicity in their bodies from dead and poison food, poison water, poison air, poison thoughts, fear from too much fear ****.

Electro-magnetic radiation from cell phones, radar, wi-fi, 5G, etc., adds to the problem as it negatively affects the mitochondria of the body’s cells.
Add in all the Big Pharma poison and you get quite a toxic society. Allopathic medicine has its place, of course it does, but ignores the message: that prevention is far more important, as you then don't get ill in the first place.

Trauma injury, of course, is something else, and I'd include getting bitten by a wild animal in that category. Humans, as violent thugs, have learned to be good at trauma medicine. Allopathic medicine profits from illness, not wellness. Often creates emergencies where none exited, only because that's what it handles best. We do not have an immune system, we have a toxin/poison/chemical removal system. Microbes are part of us, they are everywhere, even inside your cells. They do not cause dis-ease and can't. Break the spells, they lie!!!

The most evil thing the liars have done .... and for a loooong time ... is to convince humanity that their own detoxification and cleansing of our own body/tissues/system from toxins/chemicals/poisons etc., is an attack by 'viruses' which do not exist and bacteria which do not cause dis-ease or infect etc. Our bodies heal all by themselves ... and microbes help ... that's why they are always there .... and everywhere .... and always will be. This collection of microbes, includes bacteria, fungi, viruses, and their genes, that naturally live on our bodies and inside us.

Bechamp discovered this by 1860, they have hidden it! 'The Blood and it's Third Element' - Antoine Bechamp and 'Bechamp or Pasteur?' - by ED Hume. There are several other books exposing the fraud and liar Pasteur. Bechamp discovered that bacteria within us come out to do their job when there is material/tissue to break down or when we die. They are within us and they can only ferment and breakdown non living things like tissues and even metals. They do not infect and replicate. They help provide vital minerals and also help get rid of waste/toxins in our bodies.
They have brainwashed the masses that it's not all the poisons/chemicals/toxins/radiation/poor diet/stress that causes dis-ease, but its microbes.
They have deceived humanity to use antibiotics to kill their own flora and poisons to stop things that are not the cause of dis-ease (like the imaginary nonexistent 'virus'). It's obvious now that it's everything but microbes that cause dis-ease, are you still sleeping?

And where do the healing microbes mostly reside? In the gut, in the intestines. If one has good gut flora from a good and natural diet, they are more likely to not get ill at all. Hence why natural unpasteurized fermented foods, (sauerkraut, kimshci, etc.), are some of the most healthiest foods one can eat as they support the gut microbiome flora, which are full of probiotics, high in Vitamin C, and other vitamins and minerals, that will keep a person healthy.

Antibiotics kill off the gut microbiome flora and can take a very very long time to restore.