Context...destroys Barr's narrative...Trump's tweets....

[transporter]

...and the hopes and dreams of the ignorati:

pg 2 of Volume 2:

Fourth,

if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

That says it all right there. Comrade GURPS, spitbubble HIjinx, et. al. You can produce all the propaganda you want...it won't change the text of the report. And that report states loudly and clearly that the Special Prosecutor believes the evidence shows the sitting President of the United States took actions that amount to obstruction of justice.

Which then also means Barr misled the American public in his 4 page letter which stated:

After making a “thorough factual investigation” into these matters, the Special Counsel considered whether to evaluate the conduct under Department standards governing prosecution and declination decisions but ultimately determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion - one way or the other – as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction. Instead, for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the Special Counsel views as “difficult issues” of law and fact concerning whether the President's actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction. The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

The bolded text is clearly incomplete and out of context at best...at worst it is a bald faced lie.

The underlined text is also clearly a misrepresentation of Item 4 which clearly states that the evidence exists to pursue an obstruction charge against Donald Trump (Items 1-3 lay out why the Special Prosecutor declined to make the charge against a sitting President).

The italicized text is clearly intended to misrepresent the findings included in the Fourth item on page 2 of Volume 2 of the Mueller report. Barr cherry picked a portion of the last sentence in an effort to defend the President...a President who is ethically, morally and intellectually bankrupt.

Now for those who can't follow along, the job of the Attorney General is NOT as defense attorney for the President. The AG is the people's prosecutor.

 

[littlelady]

 

[transporter]

Huh....wasn't it spitbubble who recently claimed how stupid people must be to just post that emoji???

 

[littlelady]

...and the hopes and dreams of the ignorati:

pg 2 of Volume 2:



That says it all right there. Comrade GURPS, spitbubble HIjinx, et. al. You can produce all the propaganda you want...it won't change the text of the report. And that report states loudly and clearly that the Special Prosecutor believes the evidence shows the sitting President of the United States took actions that amount to obstruction of justice.

Which then also means Barr misled the American public in his 4 page letter which stated:



The bolded text is clearly incomplete and out of context at best...at worst it is a bald faced lie.

The underlined text is also clearly a misrepresentation of Item 4 which clearly states that the evidence exists to pursue an obstruction charge against Donald Trump (Items 1-3 lay out why the Special Prosecutor declined to make the charge against a sitting President).

The italicized text is clearly intended to misrepresent the findings included in the Fourth item on page 2 of Volume 2 of the Mueller report. Barr cherry picked a portion of the last sentence in an effort to defend the President...a President who is ethically, morally and intellectually bankrupt.

Now for those who can't follow along, the job of the Attorney General is NOT as defense attorney for the President. The AG is the people's prosecutor.

What about Holder and Lynch under Obama? Your thoughts would be appreciated. Not holding my breath. That would be stupid.

 

[littlelady]

Huh....wasn't it spitbubble who recently claimed how stupid people must be to just post that emoji???

 

[TCROW]

What about Holder and Lynch under Obama? Your thoughts would be appreciated. Not holding my breath. That would be stupid.

This report is about Trump. Try and stay focused.

Say, you bothering to try and slog through the redacted report or are you happy being told what to think?

 

[This_person]

. the Special Counsel considered whether to evaluate the conduct under Department standards governing prosecution and declination decisions but ultimately determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment.

As made famous by Rush, the special counsel decided not to prosecute. Thus, ipso facto, they made the decision prosecution was not appropriate.

They made it very clear that prosecution was certainly possible post-presidency, so there's no reason not to recommend prosecution if they felt it was appropriate. By deciding not to prosecute, they made their thoughts on the possibility of successful prosecution clear.

 

[BOP]

Don't blame me; I only repeat what my handlers tell me to repeat.

So tell us, genius, where do you stand on James Comey's decision not to refer Hillary for prosecution? Here's the text, just in case you've "forgotten," or more likely have never read it:

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System — FBI

Director Comey's statement to the press on the FBI’s investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail system during her time as Secretary of State.

www.fbi.gov

 

[CPUSA]

This report is about Trump. Try and stay focused.

Say, you bothering to try and slog through the redacted report or are you happy being told what to think?

Good Morning Sadpussi!!
Still focusing on the misery that is your life?!
I see you're not even bothering to slog through the report...you're just accepting Schitt's & Nadlicker's lies in their entirety.
Like the Borg slave that you are, pathetic cuck...

 

[TCROW]

Good Morning Sadpussi!!
Still focusing on the misery that is your life?!
I see you're not even bothering to slog through the report...you're just accepting Schitt's & Nadlicker's lies in their entirety.
Like the Borg slave that you are, pathetic cuck...

Child Porn USA! Good to hear from you. Quit sending those pictures to my inbox!

 

[CPUSA]

Child Porn USA! Good to hear from you. Quit sending those pictures to my inbox!

I'm sorry about that. Those were all women over 18.
Don't have any of young alter boys for you...I'm not into that kinda perversion...