data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7ba1/c7ba162543d1cf2014be4501d49d0c54ed6203f1" alt="Fire :fire: 🔥"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04591/045917473f3bbdc0aabdd75af1d6f4187fdf3014" alt="image 8.png image 8.png"
CLIP: Robert Kennedy, Jr. talks about the New York Times exposé at his confirmation hearing (0:36).
But don’t worry, they were billions of dollars in grants to the right scientists. There nothing to show for it all now, of course, but what difference does that make?
“Despite decades of research,” Piller wrote, “no treatment has been created that arrests Alzheimer’s cognitive deterioration, let alone reverses it.” He assembled a team of independent experts who reviewed 25 years of Alzheimer’s research. In other words, the same frozen post-Millennial period we’ve been talking about. “The dismal lack of progress is partly because of the infinite complexity of the human brain,” he noted, “but there’s another, sinister, factor at play.”
What sinister factor?
Piller’s team of experts identified nearly 600 dubious papers that he said have distorted the field — papers that have themselves been cited some 80,000 times more in the scientific literature. More to the point, all other Alzheimer’s theories were frozen out, pinning a single, wrong hypothesis in place and freezing all progress toward a cure. For 25 years.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c305/6c305c781a73cd1d21d545bd00a26e3f9b395b3c" alt="image 14.png image 14.png"
The world desperately needs a cure for this devastating disease, which makes the scientific misconduct all the more insidious and indefensible. So, Pillar asked, Why would a scientist do it? There’s a very simple answer, and it is that the NIH picked a winner. The government’s premier health agency called the game, naming the amyloid hypothesis the winner. It then defended that wrong decision against all comers and, despite growing evidence to the contrary, steamrolled that theory while viciously canceling any rare honest scientists who asked questions.
Yes, but why? It will not surprise you that the last 25 years’ worth of NIH-sponsored, FDA-approved Alzheimer’s drugs generously profited big pharma while producing no quantifiable benefits for patients except drastically increasing their risks of death and making their Alzheimer’s worse:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/577dd/577dd83f9e1b0be6cf85083e9fd210bb2ece3622" alt="image 9.png image 9.png"
This shocking scandal, all but lost in the tsunami of Trump 2.0 news, is painfully unforgivable. If this is the science, why should anyone follow it anywhere? The current road of science leads to death, serious brain injury, and shrunken grey matter.
Zero progress in Alzheimer’s. Understanding what has held up any progress in Alzheimer’s, maybe you can understand why there’s also been no meaningful progress in other major health problems for the last quarter century. If anything, we’re going backwards rather than forwards, defying the normal trajectory of the last 2,000 years of scientific revolution.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/644ed/644ed7696e52de850ac628c9110e63b6e07ca717" alt="www.coffeeandcovid.com"
☕️ THE BIG THAW ☙ Thursday, February 6, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
How USAID and the rest of the Deep State machine ruined the Millennium; the stratospheric stakes for all humanity; and what we must do NOW to fight back.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bbf7/3bbf73ddd817a03b4c8ff14978d70d8a4405b782" alt="www.coffeeandcovid.com"