Cletus_Vandam
New Member
GraphitePearl said:Allow me to clarify a few things here....
The Chesapeake Ranch Club (now known as Chesapeke Ranch Estates) was orginally a destination for vacationers that had second homes by the bay. It was built with seasonal living in mind and had a club house built along with camp grounds and a man made lake for relaxing. It was a private club that was self supporting by dues paid for by its property owners and when the population boom hit it coincided with the selling of the property by its original owners. It was never, ever designed to be a subdivision. Part of the problem is that there are so many lots on the property and with many houses in and around being built in the late 50's to early 60's as vacation homes (I know, the one I own and live in is one of them) property developers came in during the 90's and still today are building spec houses right on top of one another and next to all of the orginal houses and properties. With no planning at all and no guidelines for how houses should look if you drive around (which you saw on your first visit) you will see low income homeowners that have lived here for 20+ years (most of whom bought thier homes for under 70k) with houses right next door to 400K homes. If you look throughout the county there are very few places you can buy a home and have access to a fresh water lake, 2 bayfront beaches, a clubhouse that can be rented by any property owner and close proximity to such a good public school system for the amount of money that can purchase a home here. Am I defending the community in which I live? Absolutely. Is it the best place in the county to live? Hell no. For the money though, it can't be beat. No place is without its compromises. Before you make up your mind, take a look at all the property and homes available on all sides of the community. It is huge (which is really an understatement) and there are good areas to go with the bad. Just be sure to check out the good ones before you decide its all bad.![]()
oh and ps-the roads are typically in better shape in here than RT4 when it snows.
I should open with "no offense, but"; but I know you will take offense to the following.
The reason
Going by your description, CRE obviously does not have a well-established covenant. While there are those that abhor covenants, there is no argument that they [1] protect property value and [2] do create a sense of architectural stability within the neighborhood. At least with covenants you won’t have a 600 square foot shack, next to a 4,000 square foot mansion.
On the chance that CRE does have covenants, the community is either not enforcing them, or they have not been updated to meet the standards of today [addressing architectural standards, etc].
I’ve lived in a lot of communities, all of them had covenants to some level. I never had the neighbor with their car up on jack stands for a year with a motor sitting on the porch, or the siding half falling off another house…. There are plenty of these in CRE.
Sorry to be honest.