S
Give him the county's assessed value and if he doesn't like it, take it to court.Bruzilla said:I thought this was a cool idea at first, but it's only significant if the house has some kind of emotional value to this pinhead. Otherwise he just gets top dollar for his house and moves on to another.
Then we just have to do it again and again... until he gets the point.Bruzilla said:I thought this was a cool idea at first, but it's only significant if the house has some kind of emotional value to this pinhead. Otherwise he just gets top dollar for his house and moves on to another.
We know, it just sounds like sweet revenge.ohstate said:The city would be stupid to exercise eminent domain just to try to prove a point. They'd just be buying a massive law suit, which most jurisdictions can't afford. What a waste of taxpayer dollars.
and expensiveczygvtwkr said:Moving is a pain in the butt in itself.
Yeah, from what I have read so far is that they are saying that if a municipality uses it to create these "economic boons" then they will loose any Federal funding coming their way. It's an amendment tied to appropriations bills and I am looking for the exact language.Railroad said:My wife's reading a news story which reports that Congress is working on a bill to make it more difficult for local governments to exercise Eminent Domain.
Might be the first truly good thing to come out of Congress in a while.
This whole issue, along with a few other decisions they've made of late, and some historical decisions they've made, have earned the Supreme Court a new place on my premanent "bad" list. They are being allowed to overstep their bounds and are no longer using the Constitution as they should.