'Cyberbully' Mom Pleads Not Guilty In MySpace Case

R

RadioPatrol

Guest
:coffee:

'Cyberbully' Mom Pleads Not Guilty In MySpace Case

By Michele Masterson, ChannelWeb
10:59 AM EDT Tue. Jun. 17, 2008
Lori Drew, the "cyberbully" mom charged with indirectly causing a teenage girl to commit suicide, pleaded not guilty Monday in a four-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles.

The O'Fallon, Mo., mother is specifically charged with one count of conspiracy and three counts of accessing protected computers without authorization to obtain information to inflict emotional distress on 13-year-old Megan Meier, an acquaintance of her daughter. In addition to Drew, her daughter and another teen were reportedly involved in the harassment; all have denied their involvement.

U.S. District Court Judge George Wu is overseeing the case, according to Reuters. Drew was freed on $20,000 bond, and a status conference is slated for June 26. A trial is scheduled for July 29.

Drew is accused of posing as a boy on MySpace using the alias "Josh Evans" and sending messages to Meier. Starting in September 2006, the messages reportedly were friendly and expressed romantic interest in Meier and later became abusive. Meir, who was characterized by her mother as having depression and self-esteem issues, committed suicide.

The case was investigated by special agents with the FBI in St. Louis and Los Angeles.

In the indictment, MySpace was identified as the "operator of the site, [which] acted as an ISP." The case was taken to Los Angeles, where MySpace owner Fox Entertainment Media is located, after attempts to charge Drew and the others in Missouri failed.

U.S. Attorney Thomas P. O'Brien has said the case is the first time the statute known as the Federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which covers accessing protected computers, has been used in a social-networking case.

In a statement, O'Brien said "Drew and her co-conspirators violated MySpace's 'terms of service' that prohibit users from, among other things, using fraudulent registration information, using accounts to obtain personal information about juvenile members, and using the MySpace communication services to harass, abuse or harm other members."


O'Brien said Drew "violated rules established to protect young, vulnerable people. Any adult who uses the Internet or a social gathering Web site to bully or harass another person, particularly a young teenage girl, needs to realize that their actions can have serious consequences."

Salvador Hernandez, Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI in Los Angeles, echoed O'Brien's statements and said that adults need to be sensitive to the potential dangers posed by the use of the Internet by children.

"Whether we characterize this tragic case as 'cyberbullying,' cyberabuse or illegal computer access, it should serve as a reminder that our children use the Internet for social interaction and that technology has altered the way they conduct their daily activities."

According to Wired magazine, a blogger has since published Drew's name online and other bloggers then dug up Drew's personal information and posted her husband's name, family address, phone number and cell phone number. In addition, the advertising company owned by the Drews was targeted when bloggers listed their clients' contact information and called for a boycott of the business


:whistle:


OK while I think DREW's actions are reprehensible, I am a bit disturbed by:

The case was taken to Los Angeles, where MySpace owner Fox Entertainment Media is located, after attempts to charge Drew and the others in Missouri failed.

where by the FEDS cannot get the case they want in the local jurisdiction, go shopping for a better venue.

Other than that, lock Drew up for awhile and give others that would harass and bully Children via social networking sites pause .... :yahoo:

well I think the definitions are very important in case law:

"Whether we characterize this tragic case as 'cyberbullying,' cyberabuse or illegal computer access

Not quite sure how a public computer rises to "Protected"

U.S. Attorney Thomas P. O'Brien has said the case is the first time the statute known as the Federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which covers accessing protected computers, has been used in a social-networking case.

In a statement, O'Brien said "Drew and her co-conspirators violated MySpace's 'terms of service' that prohibit users from, among other things, using fraudulent registration information,

unless you are trying to hack into it ....

so does this mean if I put up a password protected website, aka humpmydog.com for Dog Humpers and deny the police access in the terms of service, they have to prosecute themselves for access protected computers if the police register and come in looking for misdeeds ....

:eyebrow:
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
so does this mean if I put up a password protected website, aka humpmydog.com for Dog Humpers and deny the police access in the terms of service, they have to prosecute themselves for access protected computers if the police register and come in looking for misdeeds ....

If you had Terms like that, your ISP would probably shut you down before the cops even got to you. And the "protected computer" is most likely the server MySpace is hosted on.

That said, I do love creative legal charges! Cases where someone has clearly done something wrong and should get the chair, yet there is no specific violation to charge them with, piss me off to no end. Like there has to be a law against every little niggling thing.

Tigger used to have a forum way back when, and her Terms were simple:

1. You will be booted for doing anything wrong.
2. Me and TWL decide what's wrong.

I thought that was brilliant.
 

jetmonkey

New Member
If you had Terms like that, your ISP would probably shut you down before the cops even got to you. And the "protected computer" is most likely the server MySpace is hosted on.

That said, I do love creative legal charges! Cases where someone has clearly done something wrong and should get the chair, yet there is no specific violation to charge them with, piss me off to no end. Like there has to be a law against every little niggling thing.

Tigger used to have a forum way back when, and her Terms were simple:

1. You will be booted for doing anything wrong.
2. Me and TWL decide what's wrong.

I thought that was brilliant.
She doesn't have a forum anymoar? :confused:
 
R

RadioPatrol

Guest
And the "protected computer" is most likely the server MySpace is hosted on.



yeah and ? when you register for a free myspace you are granted access to the web pages .... somehow I do not think this was the intent of that law ...

IMHO, it was probably written to JAIL hackers ...

not someone who lies about who they are violating terms of service ..........

that is like carding someone to get into a chess club ... you find out the ID is fake and they are older than you thought ... you kick them out, it does not rise to level of Criminal Actions ........ somehow violating MySpace Terms of service does not rise to the level of Criminal Actions ......
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
somehow violating MySpace Terms of service does not rise to the level of Criminal Actions ......

Misrepresenting yourself to engage in harassment of a minor should be a criminal action. Since it's apparently not, I'll settle for violating Terms of Service.
 
Top