Dad's ironclad morals are clear, but too harsh?

I don't think he's being unreasonable at all...but rather upfront, to the point and very clear on where he stands...:shrug:

Dear Carolyn:

I am an old-school dad with Christian morals. I have three teenage daughters, 14, 18 and 19. Only the eldest is dating at this time. I tell them every day that I love them.

I have told my daughters for a few years now that if they get into a relationship, move in with a guy and decide later to get married, I will not pay for the wedding or reception. I would go to the wedding, give them away, but nothing else. That is the consequence for their action. If they do things right, I will pay.

Also, I've told my daughters several times that I will not raise my grandchildren because of their poor choices (I would in case of death or illness, etc.). They will have to find somewhere to live. If they want to make adult choices they can pay the adult price.

I have several friends with unwed daughters who are raising their grandchildren (the fathers are nowhere around). These grandparents want to relax, retire, etc., but now it's like starting over taking care of a child. The little children are a blessing and are loved, but my friends have told me all the stress it has caused.

I would love and forgive my daughters if one of these things happened, but they would pay the price for their actions. Do you think this is too harsh?




D.J.

Too harsh on your daughters? Not at all. With weddings, anyone grown up enough to get married is grown up enough to pay for it, period. If parents want to pitch in as a gift, then they're free to do so on their terms -- just as children are free to decline the money if they don't like the terms. I applaud your firmness and clarity on that stand.

For the record -- and entirely without relevance -- I do balk at your phrasing, because "do things right" is, to me, nothing more than "do things your way." We're not talking life and death here, or the Golden Rule; your "right way" to get married might not be right for every couple on Earth. But it's your money and it's your world view, and you're entitled to attach strings from one to the other when the stakes are so delightfully black-and-white.

When it comes to thoughtlessly conceived children, on the other hand, the stakes turn gray, and fast. Yes, anyone adult enough to breed is adult enough to secure ample support -- and, I have to think it's good for your daughters to grow up with the expectation of being held accountable.

I think if you talk a bit more to these put-upon grandparents, though, you'll find a few who used to think as you did but have since had a change of heart. The reality of a parent who's in over his or her head is inescapable: The one who suffers most is the child.


The answer may still be to make accountability the tent pole for any shelter you provide, but when an innocent child, your grandchild, is at risk of hunger or neglect, the you-made-your-bed morality you espouse might become a luxury you can't afford. Humility is old-school, too.
 

dontknowwhy

New Member
i agree. both of my kids were given the same speech. both of my kids opted to do things their way. Both of my kids tell me they wished they did it my way. Both of my kids are suffering some but are taking the necessary steps to improve upon their lives now. I'm not outta their lives but when things get tough for them & they complain about it I tell them the answer is simple...work harder. You wanted this...
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
Jeez. My now-ex beat me down hard when I complained about letting the step-daughter's 18 yo boyfriend move in permanently with her/us when she turned 16.

It was made very clear to me that I was simply being old-fashioned and was out of touch.

Now I'm confused.:popcorn:
 

Cowgirl

Well-Known Member
I don't blame him on the kid thing. I hate the thought of having the kids have babies too early and having to raise them as well. They're going to get lots of "those" talks. :lol:

And it's his choice if he wants to pay for his daughters' weddings. I personally think it's behind the times to expect couples to wait to move in together until after they're married, but it's his money and his decision. :shrug:
 

thurley42

HY;FR
I don't blame him on the kid thing. I hate the thought of having the kids have babies too early and having to raise them as well. They're going to get lots of "those" talks. :lol:

And it's his choice if he wants to pay for his daughters' weddings. I personally think it's behind the times to expect couples to wait to move in together until after they're married, but it's his money and his decision. :shrug:

I agree with you on both of these points....His money his rules..

personally I think anyone who marries someone before they have lived with them for some time is asking for trouble...but that's just my .02
 

bbtransp

bbtransp
Yes, you get my vote, as well. I had the same talk with my son and daughter and they have turned out just fine. Kids look for those boundaries, you know. They'll thank you years later.
 

lnmarsh

Love * Luck * Faith
I agree with you on both of these points....His money his rules..

personally I think anyone who marries someone before they have lived with them for some time is asking for trouble...but that's just my .02

:yeahthat: I totally agree.
 

bohman

Well-Known Member
I personally think it's behind the times to expect couples to wait to move in together until after they're married, but it's his money and his decision. :shrug:

Depends on the age of the couple, IMO. If we're talking about young people barely out of their teens (or still in their teens), I don't think it's unreasonable to ask them to wait until they get some more life experience. If we're talking about a couple in their mid or late 20's who have had time to figure out how to live life, support themselves, etc. - whatever, move in if you think it's a good idea.

Personally, I think it's a bad idea, but when you get to that age you should be allowed to make the decision yourself.
 
Top