Democrats and Sex???

[Bruzilla]

As I listen to the news reports pouring out about the new media darling, Arnold Schwarzenegger, I can't help but notice all of the threats of negative campaigning that's coming from the Democrats concerning Arnold's alledged infidelities with women. Wasn't it the Democrats who loudly insisted that whatever happens between two consenting adults is not the business of the voters or anyone else for that matter? Wasn't it the Democrats who insisted that sexual conduct, or misconduct, had no bearing on a person's ability to lead?

Today's news deals with California Democratic Party Spokesman Bob Mulholland's comments about "bullets" being fired at Arnold, but what I found very interesting in an article about the comments on the Drudge Report today was this: "The stunning threat from Mulholland, who rose to fame in 1992 after exposing how Republican Senate candidate Bruce Herschensohn visted a strip joint in Hollywood, comes as the historic recall election moves in to high gear -- and Schwarzenegger takes the lead in the polls. " Visiting a strip joint is grounds for not voting for someone but turning the White House into a strip joint isn't?

It looks like sex is only unimportant when it comes to Democratic forays. Chalk up another reason to not believe anything a Democrat professes to believe in.

 

[vraiblonde]

It looks like sex is only unimportant when it comes to Democratic forays.

You expressed confusion but that statement tells me you understand it perfectly. But don't worry - one of the libs will come on here and tell us how Arnie's situation is "different" than Clinton's.

 

[SmallTown]

Originally posted by vraiblonde
You expressed confusion but that statement tells me you understand it perfectly. But don't worry - one of the libs will come on here and tell us how Arnie's situation is "different" than Clinton's.

It is different... Men would be more afraid to have their wives alone with arnold

 

[cattitude]

Originally posted by cariblue
What did I miss? Did they dig up some dirt on Arnie?

Not actually. He's got a reputation for "loving the women" and running around on Maria. Geezzz Cari, don't you read the tabloids?!?!

 

[cattitude]

Know what you mean. I don't know any of the details, just stuff I've heard and snippets from the TV here and there. I'm SURE we'll hear it ALL now.

 

[mainman]

Originally posted by cattitude
Know what you mean. I don't know any of the details, just stuff I've heard and snippets from the TV here and there. I'm SURE we'll hear it ALL now.

Is what we are talking about, happened a few years ago, something about him having his face buried between some chicks legs in a trailer on a movie lot. I heard about that on Stern like 2 years ago..

 

[jlabsher]

You have to remember Arnie is a European by birth. That sort of thing is normal behavior there.

He has to realize that his opponents will try to dig up all the dirt that exists and make even more up on him. He isn't worried so it must not be too bad.

 

[vraiblonde]

Cari, you must get better grocery lines than I do - I can usually get through the Enquirer AND the Weekly World News. Rumor has it that Arnie is not only a philanderer but a serial sexual harrasser as well.

But it won't matter. Most of the idiot voters will choose based on name recognition so Arnie's a shoo-in.

 

[SmallTown]

Originally posted by jlabsher
You have to remember Arnie is a European by birth. That sort of thing is normal behavior there.

He has to realize that his opponents will try to dig up all the dirt that exists and make even more up on him. He isn't worried so it must not be too bad.

Or the women are just REALLY hot, and if people start to bring the issue up, he'll just hold up the photos of the women, the men will simple stare in awe and applaud, and nothing will ever become of it.

 

[jlabsher]

"Elsewhere, opponents of Schwarzenegger have launched a scorched search for at least one video which purports to show the star openly fondling a reporter's breast while he was on a promotional tour in England or the movie 6TH DAY.

TV reporter Anna Richardson branded Arnold as "totally unprofessional" after he pawed her breast and patted her bottom during an interview. Millions watched as he repeatedly squeezed her on live morning TV, according to press reports.

In a 2002 interview with the WEEKLY STANDARD, Schwarzenegger said it was all lies. "No one that has been around me would believe that a woman would be complaining about me holding her," he cracked."

Got the female vote locked up too, looks like...

 

[Bruzilla]

Again... where are the outraged cries of the Democrats of how sexual conduct is a personal matter and has no place in politics??? If the statements that the Democrats made in regards to Clinton's actions are to be taken as being legitimate, the Dems need to get loud about how wrong it is for Arnold's opponents, whoever they may be, to attack him based on his sexual activities.

 

[SmallTown]

Originally posted by Bruzilla
Again... where are the outraged cries of the Democrats of how sexual conduct is a personal matter and has no place in politics??? If the statements that the Democrats made in regards to Clinton's actions are to be taken as being legitimate, the Dems need to get loud about how wrong it is for Arnold's opponents, whoever they may be, to attack him based on his sexual activities.

Damn dude, this is really getting to you, isn't it?

 

[Toxick]

Originally posted by Bruzilla
Again... where are the outraged cries of the Democrats of how sexual conduct is a personal matter and has no place in politics???

Don't hold your breath. This sort of hypocrisy is not only typical, it would be surprising if it was absent.

To wit:

Lefties bring up a 30-year old DUI of Bush's, in which no one was injured, and which was totally adjudicated with Bush fulfilling all the requirements of the law. But they never even mention Teddy Kennedy's vehicular homicide for which he wasn't ever even indicted! Even though a woman died!

Lefties claim to be oh-so concerned about women's rights. But they assisted Clinton in dismantling the lives and reputations of several women because they accused him of misbehavior he obviously committed -- including rape.

Lefties claim to be oh-so in favor of the First Amendment -- free speech -- as well as the right to dissent. But when their House Minority Leader, Dick Gephart votes with President Bush on Iraq -- voting his conscience instead of the party line for once in his life -- he is drummed out of his leadership role in the Democratic Party.

Civil rights? Yeah, right. They figuratively lynch any black official who tries to escape the plantation of the Democratic Party -- witness Clarence Thomas, Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice.

Look at America's intelligence agencies. Lefties bemoan our vulnerability prior to 9-11 ("What did the President know and when did he know it?") yet they themselves nearly dismantled the CIA in the Senate in the 1970's. Frank Church chaired the committee. In fact, they made it unlawful for the FBI and the CIA to exchange info on criminals or subversives. Still, knowing this, the lefties disingenuously asked in the aftermath of 9-11 why the intelligence agencies broke down -- when they themselves were responsible.

I could go on all day. What a pack of seething hypocrites.

 

[vraiblonde]

Originally posted by SmallTown
Damn dude, this is really getting to you, isn't it?

Hypocrisy is annoying and the Democrats have built their whole party around it. That's probably why they no longer control the House, Senate or White House.

 

[SmallTown]

Originally posted by vraiblonde
Hypocrisy is annoying and the Democrats have built their whole party around it. That's probably why they no longer control the House, Senate or White House.

That statement alone supports the notion both sides are hypocrits.

 

[vraiblonde]

Originally posted by SmallTown
That statement alone supports the notion both sides are hypocrits.

In what way?

 

[Bruzilla]

Originally posted by SmallTown
That statement alone supports the notion both sides are hypocrits.

How many Democrats have resigned for reasons of personal accountability for their actions? Don't strain your brain too much as I can't remember a single one. We've lost a Speaker of the House and a Senate Majority Leader because they walked the walk rather than just talk the talk.

The reason that I think the use of attacks on "sexual character" in the CA race such a big deal is that every Liberal on this site has used the defense that sex has no place in politics to inform us ignorant, back-woods, Conservatives that we're out of line for attacking Bill Clinton. If Democrats really, in their heart of hearts, believe that then they should be up in arms about what's happening in CA. And if they aren't up in arms, then all of their statements about sex meaning nothing are nothing but a way for them to justify and accept Clinton's behavior for themselves.