Democrats Sure Are ‘Historic!’

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Did you know that Barack Obama’s election was historic? Did you know his reelection was historic? Were you aware of the fact that Hillary Clinton’s candidacy was historic? As was her term as First Lady, her election to the Senate, and her appointment to be Secretary of State?

Technically, all of those things are historic – historic in that they happened and are a part of history. I’d also add I found them all to be historically bad, as in one of, if not the worst events in their respective categories. But that’s not how the Democrat Media Industrial Complex means them. The left uses the word to imply a sense of importance and success. The problem is there’s never any actual success accompanying it.

The least interesting and relevant things about anyone – their skin color and which bathroom they use – is the most talked about aspect of Kamala’s existence. A normal person would be disgusted by this, insisting on being treated as an individual and not judged by their race, etc. But Harris brings nothing else to the table. She’s not particularly charming, she’s usually the only person in a room laughing at her own jokes, and listening to her speak on important issues is a form of torture outlawed by the Geneva Conventions.

Harris slept her way into politics (I know, you’re not supposed to admit that, but it’s true) and has failed her way up ever since.

When she got to the United State Senate she accomplished nothing. Look it up, saying that is being generous. So, after 20 minutes on the national stage and bolstered by constantly being referred to as “historic” because she’s a black/Indian woman, she decided to run for president. THAT actually was historic – historically bad.




 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
We once thought Jimmy Carter's term as President was historically bad, but Jimmy has had a reprieve.
This team of Biden and the political Cosa Nostra he has put together is redefining bad.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
They do that with Karine St Pierre or whatever her name is. Any accomplishments she might have are never mentioned - it's all "Oh she's a black lesbian!" like that alone qualifies her to be WHPS.

She does have an education and professional background, so you'd think it would offend her that only her race and sexual identity matter to Democrats, but she doesn't seem to mind.
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
They do that with Karine St Pierre or whatever her name is. Any accomplishments she might have are never mentioned - it's all "Oh she's a black lesbian!" like that alone qualifies her to be WHPS.

She does have an education and professional background, so you'd think it would offend her that only her race and sexual identity matter to Democrats, but she doesn't seem to mind.
If they keep having to “out-historic” themselves, the next one will be a trans-gender in an inter-species relationship.
 
Top