Demonomics

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
This isn’t Bidenomics. It never was. This is bigger than Joe Biden, and quite frankly, he never deserved naming rights in the first place. (Half the time, he doesn't even know where his pants are.) This is a problem that’s exclusive to Democrats: Kamala Harris, Tim Walz, Chuck Schumer, Hakeem Jeffries, Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, et al. It’s a partywide phenomenon.

So call it Demonomics.

And pin it to ALL the Democrats.

Demonomics is the policy of announcing plans to shut down oil companies over the next few years, while also demanding they make massive new investments in production, infrastructure, and capacity. It’s spending $1.9 trillion to stimulate the economy, mailing everyone free money, and then going “Surprised Pikachu” when inflation explodes.

It’s blaming Putin for everything and yourself for nothing.

It’s the policy of making our country dependent (again) on oil imports from unstable, anti-American regions, and then being baffled when the Oil Oligarchs maximize profits, price-gouge consumers, and weaponize their petro-Rubles. Demonomics is putting who’s-woke ahead of who’s-going-broke — and placing Green Peace ahead of greenbacks.

There’s no more pop culture in 2024. Pop culture is dead. Today it’s all cult-culture: Different niche groups in separate (but unequal) echo-chambers. Some of these groups still consume newspapers and cable news. Others are 100 percent online. And there are increasingly bizarre dividing lines: TERF versus trans. Free Speech versus safe spaces. Woke versus DGAF. Maskers versus anti-vaxxers. K-Pop/Swifties/Beliebers versus… music that doesn’t suck.

Each group has its own tastemakers, taletellers and gatekeepers.

Because our modern culture is hopelessly splintered, your marketing message cannot be unduly complex. Otherwise, it’ll never penetrate your target-audience’s cult-culture cocoon. The more your message must be explained, the more cost-prohibitive it is to disseminate. An 18-piece Contract with America, circa 1994, is too unwieldy for voters in 2024.

A successful economic message in 2024 must be direct. The shorter the better. Ideally, the tale you tell will quickly explain the problem — and then offer the perfect solution. And if the message is transferable to ALL Democrats, you can nationalize the election, so it’s not just about one person.

So what’s the problem? Demonomics. What’s the solution: Voting Republican.

(The fact that Demonomics sounds “demonic” shouldn’t be lost on you either. It makes it that much better for PR purposes.)

Be direct: call it Demonomics. Tell the tale.

And pin the tale on the donkey(s).




 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Laura Ingram had Maria Bartiromo on tonight. They were discussing a Bloomberg Report about tomorrow's BLS jobs report. Bloomberg is reporting that BLS will be revising down the number of new jobs created for the period Mar '23- Mar '24 somewhere between 600K to 1M jobs.

They were saying that besides the negative market reaction, the chance of the Fed not lowering interest rates next month, and the higher chance of the dreaded 'R' word in the fall, how could the BLS get the numbers SO wrong. Were they padding the numbers to make the Biden Admin look better?
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Laura Ingram had Maria Bartiromo on tonight. They were discussing a Bloomberg Report about tomorrow's BLS jobs report. Bloomberg is reporting that BLS will be revising down the number of new jobs created for the period Mar '23- Mar '24 somewhere between 600K to 1M jobs.

They were saying that besides the negative market reaction, the chance of the Fed not lowering interest rates next month, and the higher chance of the dreaded 'R' word in the fall, how could the BLS get the numbers SO wrong. Were they padding the numbers to make the Biden Admin look better?
Yep... not good.
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
Yep... not good.

All of it.

Jobs numbers.

Unemployment numbers.

It's all been bull#### since the 90s and every time a Dem gets in they change it again to become even more meaningless than before.

:lmao:

Honestly believe they're trying to cover it up long enough for Trump to take over then 👉👈👎👉👈👇👉👇👎👈 at him from all directions.
 
Last edited:

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
I was about to post this. Seems like every report is quietly being revised down months later, is this a recent trend or have they always done this?
I've heard the last 10 of 12 months, they've been revised down.
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
All of it.

Jobs numbers.

Unemployment numbers.

It's all been bull#### since the 90s and every time a Dem gets in they change it again to become even more meaningless than before.

:lmao:
I guess need to see how the market reacts. I've always said, no matter how bad, Wall Street will always find a way to make money.
 
Top